<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[License Notices in Exported UDL file]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hi,<br />
I have created a UDL for a language called TTP for the ONF foundation. I’ve been asked if I can include in<br />
the UDL an explicit license notice, so recipients can know the UDL is open-source and free to use.</p>
<p dir="auto">While I can try and manually add a license notice into the XML, I think if users import and then export the<br />
result, this item w3ill be lost.</p>
<p dir="auto">Any advice?</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.notepad-plus-plus.org/topic/11220/license-notices-in-exported-udl-file</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 22:55:45 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://community.notepad-plus-plus.org/topic/11220.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2016 17:23:14 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to License Notices in Exported UDL file on Thu, 04 Feb 2016 21:26:32 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hello Michael,</p>
<p dir="auto">I’m not a lawyer and don’t know if this legal but what about using an additional<br />
keyword field which has the a license statement pointing to the gnu website?<br />
E.g <a href="http://opensource.org/licenses/GPL-3.0" rel="nofollow ugc">http://opensource.org/licenses/GPL-3.0</a><br />
To avoid mismatches, all should be encased of course.</p>
<p dir="auto">Cheers<br />
Claudia</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.notepad-plus-plus.org/post/13786</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.notepad-plus-plus.org/post/13786</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Claudia Frank]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2016 21:26:32 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>