I added the rest of the keywords to the .xml and uploaded it (same link as before). This fixes HomeWorld() because it wasn’t part of the list before. They’re now separated into two delimiters (1&2, former 2 has now moved to 3) as one of the keyword groups I wanted to apply this to is a different colour. I also checked D2’s nesting in the comment style options to support this separation.

It did break highlighting for numbers inside brackets, but checking D1 and D2 nesting inside of D3’s options seems to fix it.

The ‘=’ situation is a little complicated however. I originally put it in the comment style as it would allow it to ignore any spaces after it, hence why when moved to Operators 1 it won’t highlight keywords after a ‘=’ anymore (such as the case you found with LAN). I guess this is personal preference, but I kept it in comments, even if the equal sign stays black.

nice work, thanks for exporting and sharing. 👍

Any help with getting ‘=’ to highlight differently, as well as any ways to clean up my messy UDL setup, would be greatly appreciated.

i’ve made one single modification that delivers following result with caveats:

changes:
i’ve removed the = to ((EOL)) of the nesting comment line and added = to operators 1

pro: HomeWorld() is highlighted correctly as keyword (before, with the nesting =comment style, it was black)

con: at test = LAN LAN does not get highlighted anymore due to the space.

I’m wondering if, since comments ignore spaces in their styling, they could be incorporated. I’m also wondering if nesting can be used to have anything inside the brackets be styled differently.

---- I did some messing around and I was able to get this result, where I believe the only problem is that the ‘=’ sign isn’t highlighted properly:
https://i.imgur.com/H5nGnZ2.jpg (Edit: look at that quality from the new Win10 Snip tool! Eugh!)

Using these settings (which I’ve listed, as screenshots would take an excessive amount of room):

Keyword Group 1 (Blue, Prefix Off): Parent Random LAN

Comment style (Black, Not Line):
Open: =
Close: ((EOL))
Nesting: Delimiter 1, All KW Groups, Comment Line, All Operators, Numbers

Delimiter 1 (Blue):
Open: Random( Parent( LAN(
Close: ) ((EOL)) ((EOL)) ((EOL))
Nesting: All KW Groups, Comment & Comment Line, All Operators, Numbers

Delimiter 2 (Black):
Open: Random Parent LAN
Close: ((EOL)) ((EOL)) ((EOL))
Nesting: Numbers

The entire UDL .xml file as it is currently (I have only ported 3 keywords to use the setup as of now): https://www.dropbox.com/s/od8sku0wkpceh79/contractcfg.xml?dl=0
A file for use with the language (tests at bottom): https://www.dropbox.com/s/mi1caxm5hsnvg9q/wd_lKard.cfg?dl=0

Any help with getting ‘=’ to highlight differently, as well as any ways to clean up my messy UDL setup, would be greatly appreciated.

i won’t say impossible, but this one is gonna be tricky 😉

i’ve played around a bit using delimiters instead of keywords, as they were suggested by @Eko-palypse a couple of weeks ago, but in your case, i’m a bit stuck on a few things that might be ugly (as seen at the screenshot below):

• i get parentto correctly highlight if succeeded by a ( or preceeded by a =, but only if there’s no space in between prefix/suffix and the word parent

• one thing that i couldn’t get fixed, is that the highlighting of parent(void) also highlights everything within the () brackets.

anyways, here’s the screenshot in hope that you can use any of those settings for some of your needs.

please keep us informed of any success you had, as well as any further problems you might encounter.

ps: @PeterJones “exhumed” this old but very good udl documentation for us, just in case you don’t have it yet:
https://ivan-radic.github.io/udl-documentation/comments/