UDL: Overloaded folding close keywords

Reply to UDL: Overloaded folding close keywords on Sat, 09 Feb 2019 17:41:51 GMT

Meta Chuh — Sat, 09 Feb 2019 17:41:51 GMT

But I did find what appears to be the perfect solution by trial and error. Use single quote characters (’) to specify multi word open/closing folding in markers instead of double quotes (").

nice find (i’ve just tried out your solution) and very embarrasing that i did not try that (') out beforehand 🤭

thank you for your own, working solution and for sharing. 👍
if you like, stick around here in the future, either for casual reading, or to participate on anything of interest to you. you are always welcome.

greetings, meta chuh

Reply to UDL: Overloaded folding close keywords on Sat, 09 Feb 2019 01:03:34 GMT

rossjparker — Sat, 09 Feb 2019 01:03:34 GMT

@Meta-Chuh - not a bad compromise until I tried it with a real source file with lots of functions. Everything after the END SELECT starts to get misinterpreted as the parser is out of sync. Functions that follow start to get messed up too.

But I did find what appears to be the perfect solution by trial and error. Use single quote characters (') to specify multi word open/closing folding in markers instead of double quotes ("). Using single quotes appears to still allow any amount of white space between the words except new lines - i.e. the two words must be on the same line.

I know the language definition is terrible. But this language is very old - it dates back to the pre-internet times you were reminiscing about earlier @Meta-Chuh! :-)

Reply to UDL: Overloaded folding close keywords on Sat, 09 Feb 2019 00:59:32 GMT

Eko palypse — Sat, 09 Feb 2019 00:59:32 GMT

A hack would be to tweak the end folding statement and using an unique comment at the end.
Of course this means that you have to type this in addition but … well … it’s a dirty hack.

Reply to UDL: Overloaded folding close keywords on Sat, 09 Feb 2019 00:23:06 GMT

Meta Chuh — Sat, 09 Feb 2019 00:23:06 GMT

@guy038

The best I’ve found out, is to, simply, type in END in the Close zone. The drawback is that the word SELECT in END SELECT, is not highlighted anymore ;-))

yes, your solution is also the best thing i could find so far.

the highlighting of SELECT would not be a problem, as we can set that as a keyword with the same colour (screenshot below).
the bigger issue is, that the “SELECT” after the “END” of “END SELECT” opens another fold, but never gets a belonging closing end.
it works, but it looks a little awkward, as the function fold will overshoot the document.

what do you say, @rossjparker ?
folding seems to work using this workaround and the given sample, but not perfect.

Reply to UDL: Overloaded folding close keywords on Fri, 08 Feb 2019 23:49:14 GMT

rossjparker — Fri, 08 Feb 2019 23:49:14 GMT

Thanks for the welcome @Meta-Chuh !

I had no idea this was such an active community! Good on you all. Thanks for taking the time to look at my problem.

As suggested by @MAPJe71 (and sorry I did not think of it up front - but at least I figured out how to embed an externally hosted image! :-), here is the source snippet I’m playing with for those wishing to play along:

INT FUNCTION _KRN_Alarm_ClearSelection(INT iDspType = -1, INT iMonitor = -1)

	INT		iError = -1;
	INT		iFormID = -1;

	IF iMonitor = -1 THEN
		iMonitor = KRN_MM_GetMonitor();
	END

	IF iDspType = -1 THEN
		iDspType = miAlarmDsp[iMonitor];
	END

	SELECT CASE iDspType
	CASE ALM_CURRENT
		iFormID = mhCurrentForm[iMonitor];
	CASE ALM_HISTORY
		iFormID = mhHistoryForm[iMonitor];
	CASE ALM_SHELVED
		iFormID = mhShelvedForm[iMonitor];
	END SELECT

	IF iFormID <> -1 THEN
		iError = KRN_DG_FormClearSelection(mobjAlarmDataGrid, iFormID);
	END

	RETURN iError;
END

And here is the corresponding UDL v2.1 XML export:


	
		
			
			
		
		
			03/* 04*/ 00! 00// 01 02
			
			
			
			
			
			
			
			( ) [ ] , = ;
			AND OR NOT
			
			
			
			IF FUNCTION WHILE FOR "SELECT CASE"
			
			END "END SELECT"
			
			
			
			
			THEN DO TO RETURN CASE
			INT REAL STRING OBJECT GLOBAL
			
			
			
			
			
			00" 01^ 02" 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

In this language (CiCode), you can comment out an entire line by starting it with a ‘!’. If I comment out the blank line between the END and the SELECT, it immediately fixes the problem. And in fact this is the temporary work-around I am using currently.

Thanks once again for your interest!

Reply to UDL: Overloaded folding close keywords on Fri, 08 Feb 2019 22:56:21 GMT

Meta Chuh — Fri, 08 Feb 2019 22:56:21 GMT

@MAPJe71

remember the good old times, without any internet, public domain disks, nor bbs modems, when many of us bought computer magazines and started typing the published program listings into our home computers, for nights and nights.

(it used to be an extra challenging fun in the pre-checksum aera 😉)

maybe this just kicks in that same retro style motivation, to actually type all that stuff down … and maybe … just maybe, the op knew all that in advance, and just wanted to surprise us with a gift from our childhood 😂😂😂

btw: just kidding, welcome to the notepad++ community, @rossjparker 👍

Reply to UDL: Overloaded folding close keywords on Fri, 08 Feb 2019 21:20:18 GMT

MAPJe71 — Fri, 08 Feb 2019 21:20:18 GMT

Including the example source file and the export file of the UDL (or at least links to them) saves any (potential) helper from having to type the code and UDL entries.

Reply to UDL: Overloaded folding close keywords on Fri, 08 Feb 2019 19:35:09 GMT

guy038 — Fri, 08 Feb 2019 19:35:09 GMT

Hi, @rossjparker, @jim-dailey and All,

Jim, did you really verify your assumption, re-creating the code of the picture, in a new tab ?

It was my first guess too, but, unfortunately, it does not work :-((

Trying with END SELECT, only, in the Close part is also useless ! In that case, of course, the end of the FUNCTION area occurs on the END SELECT of the SELECT CASE block

The best I’ve found out, is to, simply, type in END in the Close zone. The drawback is that the word SELECT in END SELECT, is not highlighted anymore ;-))

However, I’m not a pro about UDL languages and I haven’t fully study the UDL documentation, yet ( See below ) :

https://ivan-radic.github.io/udl-documentation/

I do hope that I did miss something obvious ;-))

Best Regards,

guy038

Reply to UDL: Overloaded folding close keywords on Fri, 08 Feb 2019 16:16:04 GMT

Jim Dailey — Fri, 08 Feb 2019 16:16:04 GMT

@rossjparker

I believe you need a Close for every Open. I think the END SELECT is ending the FUNCTION block.

Try END END END END "END SELECT" in your Close box.