I think we got more of Peter’s “Notepad++ backstory” than specifics on how he works to search data.

My first paragraph pretty much covered my search workflow: “My general search technique is to use the standard regex search to find one at a time; I rarely need to see all the matches at once.” But I often onboard new things learned here, so maybe someday “all in file” will enter my NPP workflow. (“Find All” often in my Excel workflow, so I’m actually a bit surprised I don’t use it more in NPP, too.)

sadly for me, being sort of bored on my day job. It gave me time to explore … quirky Notepad++. It really was a sanity saver,

Understood and agreed. There are definitely times when participating in the questions and problems raised here, and exploring other NPP quirks, help save sanity during the less-fulfilling periods elsewhere.

My own “backstory” is one of needing a lightweight text editor for Perl and Python. But…the bigger backstory is, sadly for me, being sort of bored on my day job. It gave me time to explore other things, and one of those was quirky Notepad++. It really was a sanity saver, filling time; to write little productivity Pythonscripts, to read how others use Notepad++ and how they dealt with its shortcomings, to learn regex (fairly) well, etc. Even though I’m not so bored these days, time still permits for my Notepad++ “indulgence”.

My general search technique is to use the standard regex search to find one at a time; I rarely need to see all the matches at once.

That said, I’m really only a power-user because four years back, I asked a question here, and decided to reciprocate by answering other questions here. I started learning more to be able to answer more questions, and it steamrolled; I never really had super-complex needs out of Notepad++. (My general use case back then was using NppFTP to remote-edit files stored on a Linux box, using my UDL for a custom programming language, with occasionally using column-edit and some simple regex (which I was comfortable with thanks to some familiarity with Perl and using vim when actually logged into the Linux box). Nowadays, outside of the forum, it’s basically the same, but I don’t need NppFTP anymore, because work made the Linux drive available as a \\machinename\ UNC from Windows. Kind of crazy, when I actually think about it, that I’ve stuck around so long.)

I use a Find result type search way WAY more often than any other kind.

After @guy038 's admission that he doesn’t , I got to wondering if my way of searching is “weird” or different from what the vast bulk of other users do.

To clarify a bit more, I use a Find All in Current Document search WAY more than any other type. So much so that I have set up a Shift+Ctrl+doubleclick word action automatically running this type of search for me.

So how about it? What do other power-users consider their favorite search methods?

Alan, when I said, that one of your steps was not necessary, I just pointed out that, before each new search, we simply have to refer, first, to the Master Find result window and that the fact of undocking the Slave 1 Find result window is not necessary for a correct new search on the whole set of files, previously defined !

But, of course, once the different searches are performed, all these Slave # Find result windows must be undocked to get a better oversight of your current work !

Now, regarding my startling assertion about my use of the Find result panel, I have to say that, as long as I don’t have that damn Windows 10 laptop and the ability to decently program, it’s not really essential to me. But I did use the Find in Files dialog when scanning the folder where I keep all my posts to N++ Community users to retrieve some information and sometimes, too, from the folder, where I downloaded the N++ sources of a specific version ;-))

Best Regards,

guy038

Free the resulting (slave) Find result window by double-clicking its title-bar or tab

On the contrary, I think it is totally necessary, as the whole point is to be able to see and work with multiple slave windows at the same time! If these slave windows stay docked (default behavior), then only one is viewable. Certainly, it could be worked with that way, but I find it much less effective.

I don’t use the Find result panel very often

I find this statement from you, a known power-user of Notepad++, to be shocking and amazing. I use a Find result type search way WAY more often than any other kind.

Really clever ! I don’t use the Find result panel very often, but it’ll surely be useful to some people ;-)) The use of \z, to build the set of files, is quite pertinent, as every file ends, at some point, ah ah ;-))

After testing your work-around, I think that the step, below, is not necessary:

Free the resulting (slave) Find result window by double-clicking its title-bar or tab

You just have to select the Master window, first. Then, select the Find in these found results... option, again

So the road map could be :

• 1 Perform a Find in Files search ( Ctrl + Shift + F )

  • 2 Type \z in the Find what: box ( lower-case letter z )

  • 3 Choose your Directory and the File filters parameters, which defines a set of files to be scanned

  • 4 Select the Regular expression search mode

  • 5 Click on the Find All button

• 6 Select the left-most tab ( or the only tab ) of the Find result panel ( the Master find result window )

• 7 Right-click inside that window and select the Find in these found results... option

  • 8 Specify all your real search parameters, in the new dialog that pops up

  • 9 Untick the Search only in found lines option, ( To do ONCE, only )

  • 10 Click on the Find All button

• 11 After the resulting Slave 1 Find result window appears, go back to step 6 to perform other searches, on the same set of files and get other Slave # Find result window(s) !

Best regards,

guy038