@Alan-Kilborn, as the results are now more consistent I spotted a clue related to the random selection. The end of the random selection is at or very near the mouse which is there because I was double clicking on the line in the DupeLineResults.sr file. The typing cursor is also at that spot.

When we double click on a word in npp that word becomes selected. When working with DupeLineResults.sr I double click on a line and am usually double clicking on the number part of Line 1234 though I could double click on the word Line. I’m now wondering if npp or Scintilla is still in the middle of painting that double-clicked word in the DupeLineResults.sr tab while the FindAndDisplayAllDuplicateLines.py script is running notepad.activateIndex(view, index)

I tried an experiment with starting a bunch of CPU bound processes to tie up the machine but was unable to hit the sweet spot of getting random selections to happen every time. I did discover that if I use start /high when starting a CPU bound thread that having all of my CPU cores running high priority threads results badly performing windows. I killed one of those threads to free up a CPU core and both Windows and Notepad++ work very well.

But I forgot to specify that your must cancel, as well, the Word wrap feature. That is IMPORTANT !!

Do we call this YOUR bug, since you introduced the “setFirstVisibleLine” code? :-)

I didn’t try it, but probably changing:

editor.setFirstVisibleLine(line_in_source_file)

to

editor.setFirstVisibleLine(editor.visibleFromDocLine(line_in_source_file))

will cure that.

If you do get a DupeLineresults.sr file in a tab and that the corresponding source file is presently closed, any double-click on a line of the DupeLineResults.sr file will not open the source file, contrary to a double-click in the Search results panel !

Yes, well a compromise here, because this is only a single source file situation – not multi-file like a potential find-in-files – is that you already have the source file open in another tab. :-)

We can fix it with…more code… The original intent, like most of my scripts, is just a demo of possible functionality, not all-encompassing behavior. To try to do that…scripts get too long and the main point is lost, with all the error-checking needed, and the full-featuredness ratcheting up the line count…

An other minor bug :

If you do get a DupeLineresults.sr file in a tab and that the corresponding source file is presently closed, any double-click on a line of the DupeLineResults.sr file will not open the source file, contrary to a double-click in the Search results panel !

BR

guy038

So, as @alan-kilborn mentioned, to always get the target line on top of the visible screen, @mkupper, simply add this line :

                    editor.setFirstVisibleLine(line_in_source_file) 

Right after the line

                        editor.gotoLine(line_in_source_file)

But I forgot to specify that your must cancel, as well, the Word wrap feature. That is IMPORTANT !!

BR

guy038

In order to always get the target line on top of the visible screen, @mkupper, simply add these 3 Python lines :

                    curr_pos = editor.getCurrentPos()
                    curr_line = editor.lineFromPosition(curr_pos)
                    editor.setFirstVisibleLine(curr_line)

right after the line

                    editor.gotoLine(line_in_source_file)

You shouldn’t have to calculate new values (your curr_pos and curr_line).

editor.setFirstVisibleLine(line_in_source_file) should suffice.

to get rid of the random selection issue, I personally solve the problem by moving the DupeLineResults.sr file in the secondary view ! And , in that case, it does not bother anymore about a possible previous selection, in the DupeLineResults.sr file, right before double-clicking to get an other line

I can’t comment, as I can’t reproduce random selections happening.

Alan, everything is perfect with your script, by now

Well, I doubt this, given mkupper’s continuing strange issues with it.

EDIT: Ah…wait… I may have just had an inspiration on what could be happening for mkupper, even though I can’t repro it. I’ll do some more thinking on it, and if its logic is sound, I’ll post about it…

From this post :

https://community.notepad-plus-plus.org/topic/20370/how-to-jump-to-a-bookmark-and-show-the-bookmarked-line-at-the-top-of-the-screen-not-in-the-middle/14

In order to always get the target line on top of the visible screen, @mkupper, simply add these 3 Python lines :

                        curr_pos = editor.getCurrentPos()
                        curr_line = editor.lineFromPosition(curr_pos)
                        editor.setFirstVisibleLine(curr_line)

right after the line

                        editor.gotoLine(line_in_source_file)

in the FindAndDisplayAllDuplicateLines (FADADL) Alan script

Just be sure that the parameter Enable scrolling beyond last line is checked, in the Preferences > Editing panel

Now, @mkupper and @alan-kilborn, to get rid of the random selection issue, I personally solve the problem by moving the DupeLineResults.sr file in the secondary view ! And , in that case, it does not bother anymore about a possible previous selection, in the DupeLineResults.sr file, right before double-clicking to get an other line ;-)

WOW…, Alan, everything is perfect with your script, by now !!

Best Regards,

guy038

Another reason is that I have a UDL that I made for .sr files which colorizes the output somewhat like N++'s Search results,

Actually, I misspoke. When I first set it up, I was trying to do it with a UDL, but I later switched to using the EnhanceAnyLexer plugin. (I was confused because I didn’t delete my UDL when I went a different way)

EnhanceAnyLexer seems easier than trying to force N++ to artificially use the internal Search-result lexer, but it is definitely interesting to play around with something like that, so I enjoyed considering the code from @Michael-Vincent and @Ekopalypse earlier in this thread.

from ctypes import (cdll, windll, create_string_buffer, create_unicode_buffer,
    addressof, pointer, WINFUNCTYPE)
from ctypes.wintypes import BOOL, HWND, LPARAM, WPARAM, UINT

from Npp import editor2, notepad

SendMessage          = windll.user32.SendMessageW
SendMessage.argtypes = [HWND, UINT, WPARAM, LPARAM]
SendMessage.restype  = LPARAM

NPPM_CREATELEXER = (1024 + 1000 + 110)

WNDENUMPROC = WINFUNCTYPE(BOOL, HWND, LPARAM)

FindWindowEx = windll.user32.FindWindowExW
GetWindowText = windll.user32.GetWindowTextW
GetWindowTextLength = windll.user32.GetWindowTextLengthW
EnumChildWindows = windll.user32.EnumChildWindows
GetClassName = windll.user32.GetClassNameW


nppHandle = notepad.hwnd
curr_class = create_unicode_buffer(256)
WM_CLOSE = 0x010
window_hwnds = {}

SEARCH_WINDOW = 'Search results'

def foreach_window(hwnd, lParam):
    if curr_class[:GetClassName(hwnd, curr_class, 256)] == '#32770':
        length = GetWindowTextLength(hwnd)
        if length > 0:
            buff = create_unicode_buffer(length + 1)
            GetWindowText(hwnd, buff, length + 1)
            if buff.value == SEARCH_WINDOW:
                window_hwnds[buff.value] = hwnd
                return False
    return True

EnumChildWindows(nppHandle, WNDENUMPROC(foreach_window), 0)

if SEARCH_WINDOW in window_hwnds:
    SCI_GETPROPERTY = 4008
    sci_hwnd = FindWindowEx(window_hwnds[SEARCH_WINDOW], None, 'Scintilla', None)

    mark_struct = create_string_buffer(b'@MarkingsStruct')
    mark_struct_ptr = addressof(mark_struct)

    length = SendMessage(sci_hwnd, SCI_GETPROPERTY, mark_struct_ptr, 0)
    buffer = create_string_buffer(length+1)
    SendMessage(sci_hwnd, SCI_GETPROPERTY, mark_struct_ptr, addressof(buffer))

    _lexer = create_unicode_buffer('searchResult')

    ilexer_ptr = SendMessage(notepad.hwnd, NPPM_CREATELEXER, 0, addressof(_lexer))
    editor2.setILexer(ilexer_ptr)
    editor2.setProperty('@MarkingsStruct', buffer.value)
    editor2.styleSetFore(1, (224, 108, 117))
    editor2.styleSetFore(2, (229, 192, 123))
    editor2.styleSetFore(3, (209, 154, 102))
    editor2.styleSetFore(4, (97, 175, 239))
    editor2.colourise(0, -1)

Note the use of editor2!

Afaik the problem is that the “search result” lexer uses an internal structure MarkingsStruct that contains the results to which it refers.

this lexer name seems to be defined and used within N++, I wonder why PythonScript cannot activate it?

I agree with the sentiment, and a while ago I actually tried go get this going – but not to the level it seems you did. I was also unsuccessful. I had some offline chats with @Ekopalypse about it; I don’t think we got to a working solution. :-(

When typing names of files with two-letter extensions, some extensions map to known TopLevelDomains, which makes NodeBB linkify those filenames as URLs.

I always wondered why it did that – go to know.
In the past I’ve sometimes red-texted the name of scripts, but not always; didn’t realize there was possibly some harm to come from not doing it.
I’ll attempt to remember to do filenames in red-text from now on.

So the “search results” .sr suffix is trying to linkify to domains assigned to Suriname, and .py suffix is trying to linkify domains assigned to Paraguay. Whether or not those domains actually exist, it’s not a good idea to link to them: spam bots that are crawling the web see links to non-existent domains, and they may try to buy those domains and put nefarious websites behind those links just to get a few more victims.

I have red-texted the links I noticed in this discussion… but when you are previewing your post, if you see something in link color that you don’t expect, please go back and red-textify it, so that I don’t have to.

The problem you are experiencing seems to go deeper than this, but I will say that there isn’t a guarantee as to where in the viewport a line that you are moving to will appear.

Scintilla documentation for .gotoLine for example, says, “…scrolls the view (if needed) to make it (the line) visible”.

I agree that the problem I’m experiencing is odd. I was thinking about what the FindAndDisplayAllDuplicateLines.py script could be racing with and so disabled TextFX which I found I had finally weeded myself from using. That did not help the selection issue.

I tried to detect a pattern of the top or bottom of the viewport and did not see one while also getting intermittent selections. My current installation of Notepad++ seems to be nearly bare-bones. I think the only non-default plugin is PythonScript.

The next step for me is to set up a fresh portable installation.

sometimes it’s top line that is visible, and sometimes the target line is at the at the bottom of the visible page

The problem you are experiencing seems to go deeper than this, but I will say that there isn’t a guarantee as to where in the viewport a line that you are moving to will appear.

Scintilla documentation for .gotoLine for example, says, “…scrolls the view (if needed) to make it (the line) visible”.

Programmers can pull extra duty to ensure that a line appears in the viewport where they want it to; example HERE.

Is it only a “random selection” issue? That is, if you pretend the selection isn’t there, does your caret (at one end of the selection) end up on the correct line? If that’s the case, maybe we can simply cancel the selection.

When a selection happens I am taken to the middle of a page with the selection ending at the line I’m on. The intended target line is on the page, sometimes it’s top line that is visible, and sometimes the target line is at the at the bottom of the visible page.

This item is unrelated to the random selection issue. I don’t know if it’s by design but sometimes double clicking takes me to a page with the target line at the very top and other times the target is at the very bottom of the selected page. This slows me down because after double clicking I need to then visually find the newly selected line. The choice of top or bottom seems random, even when retesting a line such as 6208.

I now have two workarounds as I understand better what is happening with the random top/bottom combined with the intermittent appearance of a selection. When I get a selection I can go back to DupeLineResults.sr and double click again. The odds are it will work.

Another workaround is to be mindful of the line number I intend to go to when double clicking in DupeLineResults.sr. If I get a selection then I know the line I want is either the first or last line on the page and so can look for it and move there without needing to re-run the double-click.

The glitch is intermittent and can’t be solved by just cancelling the selection. However, a possible workaround in the code is to fetch the current line number. If you are not on the expected line then cancel the selection and re-run going to the target line.

When I double click in DupeLineResults.sr I’m seeing that one of three things will happen:

1. I am taken to the selected line which is positioned at the top of the page.
2. I am taken to the selected line which is positioned at the bottom of the page. This seems to happen more often than being taken to the top of the page.
3. I am taken to the middle of a page though trending towards the upper half and will have a selection running from the top of the page to my spot in the middle. The intended target line has always been either the first or last visible line on the page. The selection has always started far up the file and tends to be near the top.

I don’t know if it matters but I run Notepad++ (and all apps) in full screen mode and have a single monitor. It lets me focus on what I’m working on. My fingers are well versed in the keystrokes needed to navigate among tabs of those apps that have tabs and are well versed in Alt-Tabbing to other apps.

output file has a .sr extension. The sr stands for “search results”; I tried to emulate Notepad++'s Search results format in the output I created.

Another reason is that I have a UDL that I made for .sr files which colorizes the output

A bit off topic for this current discussion, but Notepad++ has a “lexer” for “Internal Search” called “searchResult” that has entries in both ‘langs.model.xml’ and ‘stylers.model.xml’. You can see it in:

https://github.com/notepad-plus-plus/notepad-plus-plus/blob/97dd708e233559a4a0bd819f7ee72892c27e1a66/PowerEditor/src/ScintillaComponent/ScintillaEditView.cpp#L116

The “lexer” is set here:

notepad-plus-plus/PowerEditor/src/ScintillaComponent/FindReplaceDlg.cpp:
640: 	if (_scintView.execute(SCI_GETLEXER) == SCLEX_NULL)
641: 	{
642: 		_scintView.setLexer(L_SEARCHRESULT, LIST_NONE); // Restore searchResult lexer in case the lexer was changed to SCLEX_NULL in GotoFoundLine()
643: 	}

which through setLexer() eventually calls:

notepad-plus-plus/PowerEditor/src/ScintillaComponent/ScintillaEditView.cpp:
2165: bool ScintillaEditView::setLexerFromLangID(int langID) // Internal lexer only
2166: {
2167: 	if (langID >= L_EXTERNAL)
2168: 		return false;
2169: 
2170: 	const char* lexerNameID = _langNameInfoArray[langID]._lexerID;
2171: 	execute(SCI_SETILEXER, 0, reinterpret_cast<LPARAM>(CreateLexer(lexerNameID)));
2172: 	return true;
2173: }

That functionality can be “duplicated” in PythonScript and in fact I have a “hidder Lexer” script based on work from @PeterJones and others that can enable some of Lexilla’s lexers that N++ does not expose. I’m wondering why we can’t just:

from ctypes import windll, addressof, create_unicode_buffer
from ctypes.wintypes import HWND, UINT, WPARAM, LPARAM

from Npp import editor, notepad

SendMessage          = windll.user32.SendMessageW;
SendMessage.argtypes = [HWND, UINT, WPARAM, LPARAM]
SendMessage.restype  = LPARAM

NPPM_CREATELEXER = (1024 + 1000 + 110)

_lexer     = create_unicode_buffer('searchResult')

ilexer_ptr = SendMessage(notepad.hwnd, NPPM_CREATELEXER, 0, addressof(_lexer))
editor.setILexer(ilexer_ptr)

editor.colourise(0, -1)

which (I hope) is the smallest self-contained example of what my hidder Lexer script does. I tried this but it does not lex the document as “searchResult” or “Internal Search”. I’m sure it’s a bit different in that I’m not trying to activate a Lexilla lexer, but this lexer name seems to be defined and used within N++, I wonder why PythonScript cannot activate it?

Cheers.

I’m still getting and puzzling over the random selections issue.

Is it only a “random selection” issue? That is, if you pretend the selection isn’t there, does your caret (at one end of the selection) end up on the correct line? If that’s the case, maybe we can simply cancel the selection.

It seems maybe there is something of a race going on here. The double-click makes Scintilla want to do something in the current (results) file – it wants to select a double-clicked word – but maybe that processing is somehow delayed until the source file is activated, and then bogus positions are used as Scintilla finishes making its selection? This goes against my understanding of how it should work but…

Oh…yes. Alan, I am unforgivable and deeply sorry ! Of course, everything worked fine after I stopped and restarted Notepad++. ;-))

Just a lesson : No good to be too lazy. Things must be run on the right order !

Best Regards,

guy038

P.S. :

Finally, I understand your design decision… once you’re no longer surprised to see several sets that seem to concern only one set !

I’m still getting and puzzling over the random selections issue. I don’t have any selections active and so for now have been trimming my test file down. At present it’s 787 lines of plain ASCII with no line longer than 100 characters.

As you and others are not seeing the issue with larger files I’m going to change tactics and set up a bare bones portable v8.6 x32. My day to day installed copy of Notepad++ has cruft from many years of upgrading and is also x32 for compatibility with a couple of obsolete plugins. It’s using PythonScript version 2 which I assume is still available.

but the two modifications fail

Did you restart Notepad++ after making the modifications?

BTW, these lines control that:

if __name__ == '__main__':
    try:
        fadadl
    except NameError:
        fadadl = FADADL()
    fadadl.run()

The first time the script is run during a Notepad++ invocation (don’t want to use the word “session” here), fadadl doesn’t exist, so the NameError happens and the fadadl = FADADL() line executes (key part: registering the callback), and then the run method is called.

Because the callback is already there the second and later times the script is executed, the fadadl = FADADL() line does NOT execute; we don’t want multiple copies of the callback (otherwise a double-click on a Line x line would run the same callback code two or even more times). Thus any changes you’ve made to the code do not get picked up, and only the run method is called (with the code that was in place during the first execution).

There are other ways to accomplish these goals, but I’ve never fully trusted trying to remove an existing callback. I consider needing to restart Notepad++ a small limitation, because most users would just use the script, not modify it.

I hope this makes sense.

Sorry, Alan, but the two modifications fail :-((

Whatever the choice, I get the message :

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "D:\@@\792\plugins\Config\PythonScript\scripts\Test_Alan.py", line 89, in doubleclick_callback
    if m:
AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'group'

BTW, don’t rely, on the line number as I added some comments at the beginning of script

Deleting the .lstrip() string leave the lines Set-### text: ........ as they were before, without any change !

BR

guy038