Open files tabs - auto-sorted how?
Michael Vincent last edited by
thx - now I remember that I have thought about it once and
I guess it isn’t that easy. WDN_NOTIFY is NOT a normal windows message but one registered by npp.
Hmm … have to think about it once more.
I have not found a way to receive the custom registered messages
using the Windows API.
I’ve also tried to see if this is cached in the registry in any way,
but no luck so far.
Too bad. I really want auto-sort tabs because it is driving me crazy when I am coding and having 10 tabs open. Any other light weight editor with such feature? I only need three things:
- auto sort tabs in real time
- list of functions in current file i am editing
- list of files in folder
Alan Kilborn last edited by Alan Kilborn
auto sort tabs in real time
But it is really a dumb feature to use or not use an editor based upon. And…you’re not going to find any editors out there that do it.
guy038 last edited by guy038
@maxitrol-mat, you said :
I really want auto-sort tabs because it is driving me crazy when I am coding and having 10 tabs open
To my mind, it doesn’t seem that difficult to distinguish a particular tab among a set of
10tabs or so ! Am I missing something, here ?
Four tips :
You could un-tick the Reduce option in
Settings > Preferences... > General > Tab Bar
You could un-tick the Darken inactive tabs option in
Settings > Preferences... > General > Tab Bar
You may also change the color of the foreground and/or the background of these inactive tabs in
Settings > Style Configurator... > Global Styles > Inactive Tabs
May be, dividing your tabs between the main view and the sub-view could be interesting, with the main used files in the main view and the others in the secondary view, which would be allowed a smaller area ?
Moreover, hitting twice on the default shortcut
Alt + Wto get the list of all opened files, then on the
Alt + Tshortcut to sort them doesn’t seem an insurmountable task…, especially since you only have to do it if you open an other file, not yet present in your current N++ session !
Am I missing something, here ?
Apart from the fact that the OP wants this automated, probably nothing.
Not that I think the whole concept of auto-sorted tabs has much usefulness…
But how about a P.S. “buffer-activated” solution that checks the “order” (whatever that means, path, file, type, etc. hasn’t been defined yet, really by the OP) and if it finds an out-of-order situation, it saves the current state to a session xml file, closes all tabs (save or not could be a problem here), reorders the session file according to the sort algo, then opens the session file.
But how about a P.S. “buffer-activated” solution that checks the “order”
That might work, but it would certainly annoy me.
I mean, you always get the closing and opening
and possibly confirm the task whether to save or not …
Would definitely annoy me :-D
Well, a use-case of questionable value (auto-sorted tabs) may spur on extraordinary suggested solutions. :-)
Maybe the OP could say more about why the sorted tabs makes a lot of sense for his application, but I’m thinking that this might be impossible.
PeterJones last edited by
Moreover, hitting twice on the default shortcut Alt + W to get the list of all opened files, then on the Alt + T shortcut to sort them doesn’t seem an insurmountable task…, especially since you only have to do it if you open an other file, not yet present in your current N++ session !
If the OP really wanted to do that a lot, and since Notepad++ Macros cannot influence inside the Windows dialog box, I’d suggest an external macro-defining application, such as AutoHotKey (which I never use, but have heard good things about). In AHK, one should be able to define a macro that sends the keystrokes
Alt+W Alt+W Alt+T Alt+O(I added clicking the
OKwhen done sorting), then it could be done with a single keystroke instead of 4, which is an improvement (though not technically automatic).
astrosofista last edited by
I’d suggest an external macro-defining application, such as AutoHotKey (which I never use, but have heard good things about)
OK, I bite. I scripted something related to this
Window...menu item a couple of weeks ago —wanted a list of all the open tabs—, so here is my attempt (works fine here :)
#NoEnv ; Recommended for performance and compatibility with future AutoHotkey releases. ; #Warn ; Enable warnings to assist with detecting common errors. SendMode Input ; Recommended for new scripts due to its superior speed and reliability. SetWorkingDir %A_ScriptDir% ; Ensures a consistent starting directory. #IfWinActive, ahk_class Notepad++ !w:: WinActivate ahk_exe notepad++.exe ahk_class Notepad++ WinMenuSelectItem, A, , Window, Window... Sleep, 100 WinActivate, Windows SetControlDelay -1 ControlClick, Button4, Windows Sleep, 100 ControlClick, Button5, Windows WinClose, Windows return #If
AutoHotkeyscript only works if
Notepad++is the active application —as the
#IfWinActivedirective stats— so it cannot interfere with other applications. Fire it pressing
Alt + W, the same key combo that opens the
I don’t understand why some of you are complicating this like its a rocket science. Simple tickbox either: A) Leave tabs unsorted (like it is now) B) Always auto sort in real time
A programmer who is working on this editor, could do that in 10 minutes. I would, but I am not C programmer and I don’t have to source code.
Its that easy… and yes, it is useful!
PeterJones last edited by
You asked if it was possible. We told you how it wasn’t possible in the current application, and gave you workarounds. If you don’t like that, fine.
We aren’t the programmers. A quick search of this forum, or the offiical Notepad++ homepage, would have directed you where to actually request new features: I’ll give you a hint, it’s not here. Oh, right, @Ekopalypse even linked you to the FAQ that explains it.
yes, it is useful!
Maybe so, maybe not. But no one above said it wasn’t. You may have misread Alan, who said the lack of that feature was a dumb reason to stop using Notepad++, but he didn’t say the feature itself was dumb.
I am not C programmer and I don’t have to source code.
Its that easy…
There are two errors in those statements:
- You do have access to the source code, and you can submit PR to that source code, if you have the ability.
- If you are not a C programmer, then you cannot know how easy, or not, it is – especially if you have not studied the source code. Every time a user says “it only takes a few minutes, but I won’t/can’t”, that person proves they don’t have the knowledge to comment meaningfully on the programming task at hand. There are often many complicating factors that you, as a user, cannot think of immediately; one change may affect something else unexpected, or require edits in multiple sections, or…
And, as I said before, you never asked in the right place to request a new feature , so it doesn’t matter how long it would take to program, because the developers never got the request.
Your choices are to continue to whine, which helps no one and annoys many; to accept things the way they are and possibly use a workaround as suggested above; or to submit a feature request, and possibly use a workaround while waiting for the feature to either be added or rejected.
I’m not sure if it is the OP or someone else (it appears some username games are going on?), but someone recently opened a true feature request for it HERE.
You may have misread Alan, who said the lack of that feature was a dumb reason to stop using Notepad++, but he didn’t say the feature itself was dumb.
Don’t make me say it Peter! :-)
In this case I think it might help the OP’s case to cite any other editors out there that provide this feature.
Feature request is like screaming in the wild. As you can see nothing has happened.
As you can see nothing has happened
Developers have their priorities.
They concentrate on bug fixes and new features that they feel will be useful to a majority of users.
If they have time, and they feel a request is a nice addition, if maybe not useful to many, they will implement it.
Your choices are to continue to whine…
It appears the choice has been made!
And really, you didn’t have to break this into ANOTHER thread; serves no purpose except to have any related comments be disjointed.