Community
    • Login

    How to change/convert the format of a timestamp?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
    38 Posts 6 Posters 11.4k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • PeterJonesP
      PeterJones
      last edited by

      @Eko-palypse ,

      Indeed, there are always more formats that might exist. I’ve only seen colon-separated in .srt files, so I think that keeping it generic enough that it won’t mess up an existing .srt, even if it does have some with hours and some without.

      BTW: I had forgotten why I included the [:\d] rather than just : in my negative lookbehind: without the \d in the character class, 1:15:00.000 (which shouldn’t match) would partially match on 5:00.000, which would be even worse.

      And running a test with 1:15:00.000, even with your simpler expression, works correctly (ie, doesn’t try to change it) – ahh, that’s because the minutes are less than 60. I guess unless there’s a strange 1:65:00.000, yours won’t be a problem. I guess yours is generic enough.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
      • Meta ChuhM
        Meta Chuh moderator @Eko palypse
        last edited by

        @Eko-palypse

        I’m trying to avoid function lookups as those are expensive …

        yes, i’m a bit short on money too at the moment … and don’t even dare to give me an (s.h) for this comment 😉

        Eko palypseE 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • Eko palypseE
          Eko palypse @Meta Chuh
          last edited by

          @Meta-Chuh

          :-D - always reminds me of this

          Meta ChuhM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • Meta ChuhM
            Meta Chuh moderator @Eko palypse
            last edited by

            @Eko-palypse

            singing: ahaaaa, ahahahaaa … all the things i could do … ;-)

            Eko palypseE 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • Eko palypseE
              Eko palypse @Meta Chuh
              last edited by

              @Meta-Chuh

              I don’t understand all of this but what I got makes me laughing … :-D

              Meta ChuhM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • Meta ChuhM
                Meta Chuh moderator @Eko palypse
                last edited by

                @Eko-palypse
                i also didn’t understand many of weird al yankovic’s insider jokes, but he made a lot of 80’s songs parodies, a funny one was “fat”, a parody of michael jacksons “bad” … or at least it used to be funny to me when i was a kid ;-)

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • Meta ChuhM
                  Meta Chuh moderator @Dana Wright
                  last edited by

                  btw: my apologies to you @Dana-Wright if you had to read everything after your “Worked like a charm! Thank you very much!” and eko’s explanation.

                  sometimes (but very few) we tend to have a little “after work chat” between regulars in public, which can be a bit off topic from time to time. i hope you didn’t mind.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • Meta ChuhM
                    Meta Chuh moderator
                    last edited by Meta Chuh

                    one more song and then it’s enough for today:

                    >>> here’s a song <<< for @Scott-Sumner 😪😉😂

                    Alan KilbornA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • Alan KilbornA
                      Alan Kilborn @Meta Chuh
                      last edited by

                      @Meta-Chuh

                      As valuable as Scott’s (and Claudia’s) posts were, we have some really good new posters about scripting (example Eko, and Peter is developing as a Python person), so let’s not be too sad if they decide not to return.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • guy038G
                        guy038
                        last edited by guy038

                        Hello, @dana-wright, @eko-palypse, @alan-kilborn, @meta-chuh, @peterjones and All,

                        Just a bit late, but here are two regexes S/R which could achieve the goal !

                        Note that, regarding the initial timestamps, I will use the convention [M]MM:SS.mmm, where :

                        • [M]MM represents the number of minutes, from 00 to 119/179, with two or three digits

                        • SS represents the number of seconds, from 00 to 59, with two digits

                        • mmm represents the number of milliseconds, from 000 to 999, with three digits


                        Case A) If your file contains timestamps syntaxes, from 00:00.000 to 119:59.999, only ( so 0 <[M]MM < 2 hours ) , one solution could be :

                        • SEARCH A   (?<!:)(?:([0-5])|(6)|(7)|(8)|(9)|(10)|(11))(\d:\d{2}\.\d{3})(?=\s)

                        • REPLACE A (?{1}00:01):(?1\1)(?{2}0)(?{3}1)(?{4}2)(?{5}3)(?{6}4)(?{7}5)\8

                        Case B) If your file contains timestamps syntaxes, from 00:00.000 to 179:59.999, only ( so 0 < [M]MM < 3 hours ), a longer S/R is :

                        • SEARCH B   (?<!:)(?:([0-5])|((6)|(7)|(8)|(9)|(10)|(11))|((12)|(13)|(14)|(15)|(16)|(17)))(\d:\d{2}\.\d{3})(?=\s)

                        • REPLACE B (?{1}00)(?{2}01)(?{9}02):(?1\1)(?{3}0)(?{4}1)(?{5}2)(?{6}3)(?{7}4)(?{8}5)(?{10}0)(?{11}1)(?{12}2)(?{13}3)(?{14}4)(?{15}5)$16


                        As usual :

                        • Check the Wrap around option

                        • Select the Regular expression search mode

                        • Click on the Replace All button

                        Best Regards

                        guy038

                        P. S.

                        For instance :

                        • With the regexes A, the initial text, below :
                        00:00.000
                        23:52.984
                        39:43.529
                        59:59.999
                        60:00.000
                        78:08.168
                        91:38.524
                        103:05.216
                        111:41.465
                        119:59.999
                        

                        becomes :

                        00:00:00.000
                        00:23:52.984
                        00:39:43.529
                        00:59:59.999
                        01:00:00.000
                        01:18:08.168
                        01:31:38.524
                        01:43:05.216
                        01:51:41.465
                        01:59:59.999
                        
                        • With the regexes B, the following text :
                        00:00.000
                        23:52.984
                        39:43.529
                        59:59.999
                        60:00.000
                        78:08.168
                        91:38.524
                        103:05.216
                        111:41.465
                        119:59.999
                        120:00.000
                        147:33.150
                        160:00.058
                        179:59.999
                        

                        becomes :

                        00:00:00.000
                        00:23:52.984
                        00:39:43.529
                        00:59:59.999
                        01:00:00.000
                        01:18:08.168
                        01:31:38.524
                        01:43:05.216
                        01:51:41.465
                        01:59:59.999
                        02:00:00.000
                        02:27:33.150
                        02:40:00.058
                        02:59:59.999
                        
                        Meta ChuhM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                        • Meta ChuhM
                          Meta Chuh moderator @guy038
                          last edited by

                          @guy038
                          it’s never too late, if people care … and thankfully many do 😃
                          thumbs up 👍

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • PeterJonesP
                            PeterJones
                            last edited by

                            Thank you, @guy038. I had been trying the notation similar to (?(1)00:01) in the replace, rather than (?{1}00:01), which is why I wasn’t able to get the conditional to work right.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            The Community of users of the Notepad++ text editor.
                            Powered by NodeBB | Contributors