Community
    • Login

    Replace dialog problem

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
    21 Posts 6 Posters 1.9k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • zbrush zbrusherZ
      zbrush zbrusher @PeterJones
      last edited by

      @PeterJones Screenshot
      https://imgur.com/a/e1YbJXY
      Thanks

      PeterJonesP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • zbrush zbrusherZ
        zbrush zbrusher @PeterJones
        last edited by

        @PeterJones One more info. After capturing the screen (with PrtScr key) the “Replace” checkbox is active (enable).

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • PeterJonesP
          PeterJones @zbrush zbrusher
          last edited by

          @zbrush-zbrusher ,

          Sorry, I cannot tell from that screenshot whether or not you’ve moved focus into the Replace window. I am not convinced that you have.

          But if you really have moved focus there, then I cannot replicate your problem, and have no suggestions what you should do. Until you can give us enough that we can replicate it reliably, there’s not much that can be done.

          Alan KilbornA zbrush zbrusherZ 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • Alan KilbornA
            Alan Kilborn @PeterJones
            last edited by

            @PeterJones said in Replace dialog problem:

            Sorry, I cannot tell from that screenshot whether or not you’ve moved focus into the Replace window. I am not convinced that you have.

            Too bad the Transparency (on losing focus) was not engaged, for some conclusive proof.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • zbrush zbrusherZ
              zbrush zbrusher @PeterJones
              last edited by

              @PeterJones: here is a new screenshot (and I have moved the focus into the Replace window).
              npp-replace.png

              Alan KilbornA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
              • Alan KilbornA
                Alan Kilborn @zbrush zbrusher
                last edited by

                @zbrush-zbrusher

                It appears to be enough evidence now that there is no misunderstanding.
                Unfortunately, I can’t reproduce, so I can’t offer up any possible solution.
                :-(

                zbrush zbrusherZ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • zbrush zbrusherZ
                  zbrush zbrusher @Alan Kilborn
                  last edited by

                  @Alan-Kilborn
                  No problem. I’m pretty sure it’s an interference with an AutoHotkey script.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • guy038G
                    guy038
                    last edited by guy038

                    Hello, @zbrush-zbrusher,

                    You could test a new N++ configuation :

                    • Close any Notepad++ instance

                    • In the explorer, search for %AppData which expands to the exact location C:\Users\<user name>\AppData\Roaming

                    • Rename ( It’s better than delete ! ) the Notepad++ folder as, for instance, Notepad++_OLD

                    • Re-start N++ => Notepad++ will re-create a new set of contiguration files

                    • Perform some tests. If the In selection option is accessible and the general behaviour seems OK, close Notepad++

                    • Then, out of curiosity, you could, with an external compare tool, detect all differences betwen the two folders Notepad++_OLD and Notepad++, under Roaming !

                    Not certain of the result ! Anyway, you could swap these two folders if some other problems arise. If the new configuration seems OK, you can recover personal data from the old XML configuration files, located in the Notepad++_OLD folder !


                    Now, this part of the discussion is quite Off-Topic :

                    Looking to your screenshot, I noticed the line The World’s Hardest Sudoku ! I was intrigued… Some years ago ( 2007 ), I built up a program ( with Qbasic ! ) to solve sudokus, even those with multiple solutions. As, in your picture, this sudoku seemed completely defined, I ran my program and…, 9s later, it gave the sole solution ! So, I don’t think its the hardiest one ;-))

                    For instance, just try to solve this one, with 17 numbers, only :

                    51.  ...  ...
                    ...  .3.  .4.
                    ...  7..  ...
                    		 
                    ..3  6..  1..
                    6..  2..  ...
                    ...  ..4  8..
                    		 
                    ...  .1.  ..5
                    2..  ...  .6.
                    ...  .8.  ...
                    

                    I’ll give you the solution in a couple of days ! This sudoku is sudoku-41,699 ( out of 49,151 sudoku-17 ), of the list of Gordon F. Royle, an Australian mathematician

                    As the old link does not work any more and the new link cannot be reached ( cause Access Denied ! ), the only way is to use the WayBack Machine site ! So :

                    • The Gordon F. Royle’s article :    http://web.archive.org/web/20150823084923/http://staffhome.ecm.uwa.edu.au/~00013890/sudokumin.php

                    • The Gordon F. Royle’s list :    http://web.archive.org/web/20150629103047/http://staffhome.ecm.uwa.edu.au/~00013890/sudoku17


                    To end, here are some links for documentation on sudokus and sudoku-17 ones :

                    Wikipedia articles :

                    • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematics_of_Sudoku

                    • https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Mathematics_of_Sudoku

                    • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sudoku_solving_algorithms

                    General article :    https://www.technologyreview.com/2012/01/06/188520/mathematicians-solve-minimum-sudoku-problem/
                    Technical articles :    https://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1201/1201.0749v1.pdf    and    https://arxiv.org/pdf/1201.0749.pdf

                    https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/games/sage/games/sudoku.html   ( with Python features to solve, list and print sudokus ! )


                    Best Regards,

                    guy038

                    zbrush zbrusherZ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                    • zbrush zbrusherZ
                      zbrush zbrusher @guy038
                      last edited by zbrush zbrusher

                      @guy038 :
                      Thanks for the hint: I’ll make the test… later
                      For Sudoku: my image shows “The World’s Hardest Sudoku” for human (maybe not the hardest, but a difficult one).
                      Try the following with your program:
                      (9 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0)
                      (0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0)
                      (0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0)
                      (0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 3)
                      (0 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 0)
                      (0 0 0 4 0 0 0 7 0)
                      (7 0 8 6 0 0 0 0 0)
                      (0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0)
                      (4 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0)

                      Best regards

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • guy038G
                        guy038
                        last edited by guy038

                        Hello, @zbrush-zbrusher and All,

                        Your solution, found in 1s with my program, is :

                        972 853 614
                        146 279 538
                        583 146 729
                        
                        624 718 953
                        817 395 462
                        359 462 871
                        
                        798 621 345
                        265 934 187
                        431 587 296
                        

                        The program needed to test eight cells, which could contain a double solution. My program uses three different algorithms, tested 99 times ( 55 + 34 + 8 ).

                        In comparison, the example I gave you to look for, needs 300 s about ( although a first solution is immediately found ) and 99,580 uses of these three algorithms to explore all possible solutions and verify that there is only one solution to this sudoku-17 puzzle !

                        Note also that this grid needs to test 12,300 double solutions and 19 triple solutions and finds 12,338 dead ends ( 12300 + 19 + 19 ) !

                        Cheers,

                        guy038

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • PeterJonesP
                          PeterJones @PeterJones
                          last edited by PeterJones

                          @PeterJones said in Replace dialog problem:

                          “It works for me”. And I supply proof:

                          Back to the “In Selection” being greyed out inappropriately: in this newer topic, a sequence was found that didn’t behave as expected. So there may actually be independent confirmation of this bug – three regulars to the forum can make this sequence give the odd behavior (greyed out inappropriately) reliably now.

                          • https://community.notepad-plus-plus.org/post/61035
                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          The Community of users of the Notepad++ text editor.
                          Powered by NodeBB | Contributors