Community
    • Login

    How to change/convert the format of a timestamp?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
    38 Posts 6 Posters 16.1k Views 2 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Eko palypseE Offline
      Eko palypse @Alan Kilborn
      last edited by

      @Alan-Kilborn

      so it is still a little bit faster - to be honest, haven’t expected it.

      looped 1000 times over the same text
      16.7720000744 <-- return m.group(0)
      16.6819999218 <- return ‘{}:{}’.format(*parts[:])

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • PeterJonesP Offline
        PeterJones
        last edited by

        My two comments would be:

        1. if min > 60: = if the data is 60:00.000, it wouldn’t change. Make it if min >=60:
        2. If the OP (or someone else) has mixed data, or had partially changed them, and came back later and tried the same script, weird stuff will happen. I’d recommend: editor.rereplace('(?<![:\d])\d+:\d+\.\d+',change_format), which adds a negative lookbehind to not match if there’s a colon or another digit before the \d+
        Eko palypseE 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • Eko palypseE Offline
          Eko palypse @PeterJones
          last edited by

          @PeterJones

          YES - this is a bug it should > 59 - omg.
          About mixed data you are right but this is always the question what if it looked like
          hh.mm.ss.msec …

          Meta ChuhM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • PeterJonesP Offline
            PeterJones
            last edited by

            @Eko-palypse ,

            Indeed, there are always more formats that might exist. I’ve only seen colon-separated in .srt files, so I think that keeping it generic enough that it won’t mess up an existing .srt, even if it does have some with hours and some without.

            BTW: I had forgotten why I included the [:\d] rather than just : in my negative lookbehind: without the \d in the character class, 1:15:00.000 (which shouldn’t match) would partially match on 5:00.000, which would be even worse.

            And running a test with 1:15:00.000, even with your simpler expression, works correctly (ie, doesn’t try to change it) – ahh, that’s because the minutes are less than 60. I guess unless there’s a strange 1:65:00.000, yours won’t be a problem. I guess yours is generic enough.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
            • Meta ChuhM Offline
              Meta Chuh moderator @Eko palypse
              last edited by

              @Eko-palypse

              I’m trying to avoid function lookups as those are expensive …

              yes, i’m a bit short on money too at the moment … and don’t even dare to give me an (s.h) for this comment 😉

              Eko palypseE 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • Eko palypseE Offline
                Eko palypse @Meta Chuh
                last edited by

                @Meta-Chuh

                :-D - always reminds me of this

                Meta ChuhM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • Meta ChuhM Offline
                  Meta Chuh moderator @Eko palypse
                  last edited by

                  @Eko-palypse

                  singing: ahaaaa, ahahahaaa … all the things i could do … ;-)

                  Eko palypseE 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • Eko palypseE Offline
                    Eko palypse @Meta Chuh
                    last edited by

                    @Meta-Chuh

                    I don’t understand all of this but what I got makes me laughing … :-D

                    Meta ChuhM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • Meta ChuhM Offline
                      Meta Chuh moderator @Eko palypse
                      last edited by

                      @Eko-palypse
                      i also didn’t understand many of weird al yankovic’s insider jokes, but he made a lot of 80’s songs parodies, a funny one was “fat”, a parody of michael jacksons “bad” … or at least it used to be funny to me when i was a kid ;-)

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • Meta ChuhM Offline
                        Meta Chuh moderator @Dana Wright
                        last edited by

                        btw: my apologies to you @Dana-Wright if you had to read everything after your “Worked like a charm! Thank you very much!” and eko’s explanation.

                        sometimes (but very few) we tend to have a little “after work chat” between regulars in public, which can be a bit off topic from time to time. i hope you didn’t mind.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • Meta ChuhM Offline
                          Meta Chuh moderator
                          last edited by Meta Chuh

                          one more song and then it’s enough for today:

                          >>> here’s a song <<< for @Scott-Sumner 😪😉😂

                          Alan KilbornA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • Alan KilbornA Offline
                            Alan Kilborn @Meta Chuh
                            last edited by

                            @Meta-Chuh

                            As valuable as Scott’s (and Claudia’s) posts were, we have some really good new posters about scripting (example Eko, and Peter is developing as a Python person), so let’s not be too sad if they decide not to return.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • guy038G Offline
                              guy038
                              last edited by guy038

                              Hello, @dana-wright, @eko-palypse, @alan-kilborn, @meta-chuh, @peterjones and All,

                              Just a bit late, but here are two regexes S/R which could achieve the goal !

                              Note that, regarding the initial timestamps, I will use the convention [M]MM:SS.mmm, where :

                              • [M]MM represents the number of minutes, from 00 to 119/179, with two or three digits

                              • SS represents the number of seconds, from 00 to 59, with two digits

                              • mmm represents the number of milliseconds, from 000 to 999, with three digits


                              Case A) If your file contains timestamps syntaxes, from 00:00.000 to 119:59.999, only ( so 0 <[M]MM < 2 hours ) , one solution could be :

                              • SEARCH A   (?<!:)(?:([0-5])|(6)|(7)|(8)|(9)|(10)|(11))(\d:\d{2}\.\d{3})(?=\s)

                              • REPLACE A (?{1}00:01):(?1\1)(?{2}0)(?{3}1)(?{4}2)(?{5}3)(?{6}4)(?{7}5)\8

                              Case B) If your file contains timestamps syntaxes, from 00:00.000 to 179:59.999, only ( so 0 < [M]MM < 3 hours ), a longer S/R is :

                              • SEARCH B   (?<!:)(?:([0-5])|((6)|(7)|(8)|(9)|(10)|(11))|((12)|(13)|(14)|(15)|(16)|(17)))(\d:\d{2}\.\d{3})(?=\s)

                              • REPLACE B (?{1}00)(?{2}01)(?{9}02):(?1\1)(?{3}0)(?{4}1)(?{5}2)(?{6}3)(?{7}4)(?{8}5)(?{10}0)(?{11}1)(?{12}2)(?{13}3)(?{14}4)(?{15}5)$16


                              As usual :

                              • Check the Wrap around option

                              • Select the Regular expression search mode

                              • Click on the Replace All button

                              Best Regards

                              guy038

                              P. S.

                              For instance :

                              • With the regexes A, the initial text, below :
                              00:00.000
                              23:52.984
                              39:43.529
                              59:59.999
                              60:00.000
                              78:08.168
                              91:38.524
                              103:05.216
                              111:41.465
                              119:59.999
                              

                              becomes :

                              00:00:00.000
                              00:23:52.984
                              00:39:43.529
                              00:59:59.999
                              01:00:00.000
                              01:18:08.168
                              01:31:38.524
                              01:43:05.216
                              01:51:41.465
                              01:59:59.999
                              
                              • With the regexes B, the following text :
                              00:00.000
                              23:52.984
                              39:43.529
                              59:59.999
                              60:00.000
                              78:08.168
                              91:38.524
                              103:05.216
                              111:41.465
                              119:59.999
                              120:00.000
                              147:33.150
                              160:00.058
                              179:59.999
                              

                              becomes :

                              00:00:00.000
                              00:23:52.984
                              00:39:43.529
                              00:59:59.999
                              01:00:00.000
                              01:18:08.168
                              01:31:38.524
                              01:43:05.216
                              01:51:41.465
                              01:59:59.999
                              02:00:00.000
                              02:27:33.150
                              02:40:00.058
                              02:59:59.999
                              
                              Meta ChuhM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                              • Meta ChuhM Offline
                                Meta Chuh moderator @guy038
                                last edited by

                                @guy038
                                it’s never too late, if people care … and thankfully many do 😃
                                thumbs up 👍

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • PeterJonesP Offline
                                  PeterJones
                                  last edited by

                                  Thank you, @guy038. I had been trying the notation similar to (?(1)00:01) in the replace, rather than (?{1}00:01), which is why I wasn’t able to get the conditional to work right.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2

                                  Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                  Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                  With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                  Register Login
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  The Community of users of the Notepad++ text editor.
                                  Powered by NodeBB | Contributors