Delete duplicated expressions with keeping the first one

Ziad Aborami

I think that is not impossible.
What I want is to keep only the first result of each group of duplicated expressions with this pattern
<some thing>\R(.*?)$
Help please

PeterJones

I think this matches your description.

Find = (?s)(<some thing>\R[^\r\n]*?)(.*?)\1(.*?)(?=^<some thing>|\Z)
- this sets .-matches-newline, regardless of the checkbox
- find <some thing> on one line followed by a single line (ie, the “Dog” or “Bird” line), save in group \1
- save the next line(s) into group \2
- must find group \1 a second time (ie, a second instance of <some thing> followed by the same Dog/Bird/whatever)
- consume the next line(s)
- stop consuming when it looks ahead and sees either a line beginning with <some thing>, or it reaches the end of the document
Replace = \1\2
- take all of that match (except the “look ahead”) and replace with just groups 1 and 2 (the <some thing> and dog/bird/whatever, and the line(s) following that)
mode = regular expression

-----
FYI:

This forum is formatted using Markdown, with a help link buried on the little grey ? in the COMPOSE window/pane when writing your post. For more about how to use Markdown in this forum, please see @Scott-Sumner’s post in the “how to markdown code on this forum” topic, and my updates near the end. It is very important that you use these formatting tips – using single backtick marks around small snippets, and using code-quoting for pasting multiple lines from your example data files – because otherwise, the forum will change normal quotes ("") to curly “smart” quotes (“”), will change hyphens to dashes, will sometimes hide asterisks (or if your text is c:\folder\*.txt, it will show up as c:\folder*.txt, missing the backslash). If you want to clearly communicate your text data to us, you need to properly format it.

If you have further search-and-replace (“matching”, “marking”, “bookmarking”, regular expression, “regex”) needs, study this FAQ and the documentation it points to. Before asking a new regex question, understand that for future requests, many of us will expect you to show what data you have (exactly), what data you want (exactly), what regex you already tried (to show that you’re showing effort), why you thought that regex would work (to prove it wasn’t just something randomly typed), and what data you’re getting with an explanation of why that result is wrong. When you show that effort, you’ll see us bend over backward to get things working for you. If you need help formatting, see the paragraph above.

Please note that for all regex and related queries, it is best if you are explicit about what needs to match, and what shouldn’t match, and have multiple examples of both in your example dataset. Often, what shouldn’t match helps define the regular expression as much or more than what should match.

(yes, you did give examples, and you showed what you tried; I appreciate that. I include these because it contains useful links and additional information that you might not be aware of)

Ziad Aborami

Thanks very much.

That doesn’t work.
The problem is this marks the whole text between <some thing> and <some thing> if the word after some thing is duplicated
The second argument ist that marks only the first result with the whole text and I want to mark all other results except the first one

What I want is to match only the word not the whole explain
,
<some thing>
Bird
Explain related to Bird
<some thing>
Bird
Another explain related to Bird
<some thing>
Bird
Informations about Bird
<some thing>
Cat
Explain about cat
<some thing>
Tree
Explain about tree
<some thing>
Tree
Another explain related to tree
<some thing>

I want to delete the Items in Bold

I have tried
<some thing>\R(\w+?)$^(?=.*^\1$)

But that matches all the duplicated except the last from each group.
What I want is to match all the duplicated except the first from each group

PeterJones

Sorry that I didn’t understand you wanted to keep the extra descriptions

@Ziad-Aborami said:

<some thing>\R(\w+?)$^(?=.*^\1$)

Did you try playing around with my regular expression as the starting point, rather than starting from yours? Because you knew mine just matched too much, and I’d already told you what each of the sections of mine did. You could have gotten closer by just trying to remove sections of mine. Have you started reading the FAQ I pointed you to?

By using that procedure, and then knowing that \K will “reset” the match, so it allows getting groups from earlier in the document, but only matching/replacing what comes after \K, I was able to get something that is as close to your description as I can come:

Find = (?s)(<some thing>\R[^\r\n]*?\R)(.*?)\K\1
- I included the final newline in the group \1
- the \K resets the match, so it’s only matching the second instance of the group \1 which follows
- from my original regex, I removed the line slurp after the \1, and removed the lookahead, because all you wanted to match was the duplicate of \1
- this will only match the duplicate of the \1
Replace = empty
Mode = regular expression
Might have to hit Replace All multiple times (that’s the way to take care of the three instances of the bird, for example)

Note: when I tried single-stepping through using Find Next then Replace, it matched correctly, but didn’t replace with empty; when I hit replace all, it did replace with empty. I don’t know why, or whether that’s repeatable for others.

Starting with

<some thing>
Bird
Explain related to Bird
<some thing>
Bird
Another explain related to Bird
<some thing>
Bird
Informations about Bird
<some thing>
Cat
Explain about cat
<some thing>
Tree
Explain about tree
<some thing>
Tree
Another explain related to tree
<some thing>

The first Replace All will get it to

<some thing>
Bird
Explain related to Bird
Another explain related to Bird
<some thing>
Bird
Informations about Bird
<some thing>
Cat
Explain about cat
<some thing>
Tree
Explain about tree
Another explain related to tree
<some thing>

(where there are still two birds), and the second replace all will get it to

<some thing>
Bird
Explain related to Bird
Another explain related to Bird
Informations about Bird
<some thing>
Cat
Explain about cat
<some thing>
Tree
Explain about tree
Another explain related to tree
<some thing>

If you want extra newlines separating the second and third description, instead of an empty replace, use \r\n as the replace; after hitting replace all a few times, it got down to:

<some thing>
Bird
Explain related to Bird

Another explain related to Bird

Informations about Bird
<some thing>
Cat
Explain about cat
<some thing>
Tree
Explain about tree

Another explain related to tree
<some thing>

If this is closer, but still not quite right, you’ll have to try to modify starting from my regex, to add or subtract blocks that you think are still not properly matched. Then if you cannot get it to work, you’ll have to explain (like I did above) what you think each phrase in the modified regex is doing, and explain why the results aren’t right, giving examples in markdown formatting (to do exact quotes, rather than letting the forum interpret some characters we may be missing; my FYI above linked you to where you would find out how I’m making the exact-text blocks), so that we know exactly what you have, and what you want, and what you’re getting, and you need to explain in detail why what you’re getting is wrong.

If what I have provided isn’t enough, you will need to give more data examples of what you want, and what you don’t want. Also, rather than starting from scratch, or from your previous attempts, please try to extend or edit my regex (which I’ve explained on a phrase-by-phrase basis) – and include an explanation of what you think each of your changed phrases will do (and why you think that phrase will help). When you start from yours, which didn’t seem to come close for you, rather than from my, which came close but deleted too much ; and when you throw out the regex without any explanation of what you think that exact regex will do – when you do those, it tells me you’re ignoring everything I’ve said, and that you haven’t tried to learn from my explanations; this makes me more reluctant to keep helping.

guy038

Hello, @ziad-aborami, @peterjones and All,

I think about a possible solution, which uses only one regex S/R, that you must re-iterate till the S/R process tell you that no more occurrence occur ;-))

Assuming that the <some thing> expression does represent the literal expression <some thing>,

Let’s start with your initial text, below :

<some thing>
Bird
Explain related to Bird
<some thing>
Bird
Another explain related to Bird
<some thing>
Bird
Informations about Bird
<some thing>
Cat
Explain about cat
<some thing>
Tree
Explain about tree
<some thing>
Tree
Another explain related to tree

Then :

Open the Replace dialog ( Ctrl + H )
SEARCH (((?-s)^<some thing>\R.+\R)(?s).+?)\2
REPLACE \1
Check the Wrap around option and/or move to the very beginning of your file
Select the Regular expression search mode
Click on the Replace All button, repeatedly, till the message Replace All: 0 occurrences were replaced occurs, at bottom of the dialog

You should obtain your expected text :

<some thing>
Bird
Explain related to Bird
Another explain related to Bird
Informations about Bird
<some thing>
Cat
Explain about cat
<some thing>
Tree
Explain about tree
Another explain related to tree

Note :

You may click, instead, on the Replace button till no more occurrence occurs. Of course, in that case, the number of clicks needed is greater than with the Replace All button

If this syntax is OK for you, I could give you some explanations of this regex S/R, next time !

Best Regards,

guy038

P.S. :

Sorry, Peter, I haven’t got time to read your answer, yet, ( almost simultaneous ! )

Ziad Aborami

@PeterJones
Thanks very much that works in this example but when I have used in a large document with more than 100,000 lines that delete the whole content.
I did’t understand why this happens!
(?s)(<some thing>\R[^\r\n]?\R)(.?)\K\1
this matches in the simple example the wanted items but in my text of thousands lines that hat matched the whole content.

Ziad Aborami

@guy038
Thanks very much. That does work in this example and in short texts but in my text with more than 100,000 lines that shrinks the text and delete somethin else.
I have tried this with a shorter section from my text and that works but in the whole long text I don’t understand why didn’t work!

PeterJones

@Ziad-Aborami ,

@guy038’s solution and mine are quite similar, and they both should be non-greedy (both use the ? modifier). However, we have noticed in the past that very long files sometimes mess up the regex engine. Guy probably remembers better than I what the details of the length-limitation are.

As a formatting side note: did you notice in the preview window, when you wrote the regex, that the * character disappeared, and some of the string became italic? That’s because you aren’t properly using markdown, as was explained above, to format raw strings. It’s best to put regex in between `` , so all the regex characters embed properly.

Your regex (?s)(<some thing>\R[^\r\n]*?\R)(.*?)\K\1 rendered incorrectly as (?s)(<some thing>\R[^\r\n]?\R)(.?)\K\1
With `` notation, `(?s)(<some thing>\R[^\r\n]*?\R)(.*?)\K\1` renders correctly as (?s)(<some thing>\R[^\r\n]*?\R)(.*?)\K\1

@guy038,

No problem on the similar post: I like that yours avoids the \K-reset.

Also, please chime in on whether my memory is right on long files messing up regex, especially if you have links to the previous conversation(s), or know where the length-limit hits.

guy038

Hi, @ziad-aborami,

If your file is not personal nor confidential, and if you don’t mind, you could send me your file, by e-mail, to :

May be a specific configuration occur, in some parts of your file and breaks down the regex logic ! Be confident, there is, probably, an appropriate regex to get the job done on your entire document ;-))

See you later,

Cheers,

guy038

Ziad Aborami

@PeterJones
Thanks for your notice, I will use the notation marks the next time and thanx for the help

@guy038
I will send you the file in E-mail and I hope that you can find the solution for a large txt file and thanx in advance

Alan Kilborn

Maybe I’m a rogue but I would hit it with Python or Pythonscript:

new_content = []
flag = 0
d_dict = {}
for line in editor.getCharacterPointer().splitlines():
    line = line.rstrip()
    if flag == 1:
        if not line in d_dict:
            d_dict[line] = 1
            new_content.append('<some thing>')
            new_content.append(line)
        flag = 0
    else:
        if line == '<some thing>':
            flag = 1
        else:
            new_content.append(line)
editor.beginUndoAction()
editor.setText('\r\n'.join(new_content))
editor.endUndoAction()

Ziad Aborami

@Alan-Kilborn

Thanks for your suggestion

I got an error while running the script: (win10)

File “D:\script.py”, line 4, in <module>
for line in editor.getCharacterPointer().splitlines():
NameError: name ‘editor’ is not defined

What is the wrong?

guy038

Hello, @ziad-aborami,

EDIT on 03/02/19 :
I slightly modified the parts A , B and C, in order to respect the <tr class="content">........</tr> multi-lines blocks structure !

I did get your e-mail and download your news.txt file of 350,578 lines. This dictionnary file contains 38,783 entries and 8,117 of these entries have duplicate entries, on which a global S/R must occur !

Now, I’m going to give you 3 parts of your file, which contain duplicate entries and just tell me the final text that you expect to, for each of the 3 examples !

Part A, regarding the Abaddon entry, in 3 copies :

<tr class="content">
</>
Abaddon
<div style="margin-left:1em"><span style="color:darkblue"><b>Abaddon - <i>(der)</i></b></span>
Herkunft: hebr.<br><br>Beschreibung:<br>Substantiv<br><br></span>
Abaddon - <i>(der)</i></a>
</td>
<td class="content" width="50%" valign="top">Abgrund</td>
</tr>
<tr class="content">
</>
Abaddon
<div style="margin-left:1em"><span style="color:darkblue"><b>Abaddon - <i>(der)</i></b></span>
Herkunft: hebr.<br><br>Beschreibung:<br>Substantiv<br><br></span>
Abaddon - <i>(der)</i></a>
</td>
<td class="content" width="50%" valign="top">Unterwelt</td>
</tr>
<tr class="content">
</>
Abaddon
<div style="margin-left:1em"><span style="color:darkblue"><b>Abaddon - <i>(der)</i></b></span>
Herkunft: hebr.<br><br>Beschreibung:<br>Substantiv<br><br></span>
Abaddon - <i>(der)</i></a>
</td>
<td class="content" width="50%" valign="top">jüd. Todesengel</td>
</tr>

Part B, regarding the abaissieren entry, in 2 copies :

<tr class="content">
</>
abaissieren
<div style="margin-left:1em"><span style="color:darkblue"><b>abaissieren</b></span>
Herkunft: franz.<br><br>Beschreibung:<br>Verb<br><br></span>
abaissieren</a>
</td>
<td class="content" width="50%" valign="top">demütigen</td>
</tr>
<tr class="content">
</>
abaissieren
<div style="margin-left:1em"><span style="color:darkblue"><b>abaissieren</b></span>
Herkunft: franz.<br><br>Beschreibung:<br>Verb<br><br></span>
abaissieren</a>
</td>
<td class="content" width="50%" valign="top">erniedrigen</td>
</tr>

Part C, regarding the abgeschmackt entry, in 4 copies :

<tr class="content">
</>
abgeschmackt
<div style="margin-left:1em"><span style="color:darkblue"><b>abgeschmackt</b></span> <i class="p" style="color:green"><n></i>
<span><b>banal</b><br>
Herkunft: franz.<br><br>Beschreibung:<br>Adjektiv<br><br>Synonym:<br>abgedroschen, einfach, alltäglich, fade, gewöhnlich</span>
banal</a>
</td>
</tr>
<tr class="content">
</>
abgeschmackt
<div style="margin-left:1em"><span style="color:darkblue"><b>abgeschmackt</b></span> <i class="p" style="color:green"><n></i>
<span><b>fad(e)</b><br>
Herkunft: franz.<br><br>Beschreibung:<br>Adjektiv<br><br>Synonym:<br>abgedroschen, abgegriffen, langweilig, läppisch, ohne Geschmack</span>
fad(e)</a>
</td>
</tr>
<tr class="content">
</>
abgeschmackt
<div style="margin-left:1em"><span style="color:darkblue"><b>abgeschmackt</b></span> <i class="p" style="color:green"><n></i>
<span><b>insipid</b><br>
Herkunft: lat.<br><br>Beschreibung:<br>Adjektiv<br></span>
insipid</a>
</td>
</tr>
<tr class="content">
</>
abgeschmackt
<div style="margin-left:1em"><span style="color:darkblue"><b>abgeschmackt</b></span> <i class="p" style="color:green"><n></i>
<span><b>insipid(e)</b><br>
Herkunft: lat.<br><br>Beschreibung:<br>Adjektiv<br><br>Synonym:<br>albern, schal, töricht, uninteressant</span>
insipid(e)</a>
</td>
</tr>
<tr class="content">
</>
abgeschmackt
<div style="margin-left:1em"><span style="color:darkblue"><b>abgeschmackt</b></span> <i class="p" style="color:green"><n></i>
<span><b>maussade</b><br>
Herkunft: franz.<br><br>Beschreibung:<br>Adjektiv<br><br>Synonym:<br>schal, mürrisch</span>
maussade</a>
</td>
</tr>

In your answer, simply place the expected multi-lines text of each part A, B and C, between the two lines :

~~~html

~~~

I suppose that, with these 3 expected blocks of text, it’ll be enough to determine the right regex ;-))

Cheers,

guy038

PeterJones

@Ziad-Aborami said:

NameError: name ‘editor’ is not defined

That’s caused because the editor object was not imported into the python script.

You can add the line

from Npp import *

to the top of the script you got from @Alan-Kilborn. This will define that object for this one script.

Or, if you want it available to all scripts, you can go to Plugins > Python Script > Scripts, then Ctrl+Click on startup, add that line just after the import sys. I also recommend (though it’s not necessary for this) that you also want to use Plugins > Python Script > Configuration…, and change the “Initialisation” setting from LAZY to ATSTARTUP. Then you can save/close startup.py, exit notepad++ and reload. From then on, PythonScript scripts will always have the editor/editor1/editor2/notepad objects available; the ATSTARTUP makes it so that the PythonScript initialization happens right away, which is useful if you’ve got python-scripts adding callback hooks or similar. (This is the setup I use.)

Ziad Aborami

@PeterJones
Thanks for help.
I have got:

ModuleNotFoundError: No module named ‘Npp’

I have added from Npp import * to the first line

Ziad Aborami

@guy038
Thanks again!
I appreciate your help so much!

PeterJones

@Ziad-Aborami said:

ModuleNotFoundError: No module named ‘Npp’

Out of curiosity: are you using the PythonScript plugin in Notepad++, or are you using a normal python interpreter, running it with python.exe, python2.exe, or python3.exe? it needs to be using PythonScript plugin in order for this to work.

Also, where did you save the script that @Alan-Kilborn provided? The right way is to go to Plugins > Python Script > New Script, then give it a name (such as YourNameHere.py) in the directory that it defaults to. You then run the script using the Plugins > Python Script > Scripts > YourNameHere. For example, here’s a Hello World

from Npp import *
console.show()
console.write("Hello World")

I created the file as helloWorld.py using the above sequence, pasted in that text, then ran Plugins > Python Script > Scripts > helloWorld. This displayed Hello World in the PythonScript console sub-window in Notepad++.

Alan Kilborn

Regarding the import error with the Pythonscript presented. My bad, but I refuse to be bothered with putting those standard imports at the top of every script I ever do (thus I forget about it when posting scripts). I make sure (one time) they are in my startup.py and then I forget about it. Maybe the Pythonscript implementers should consider adding those imports at the top of a file when the New Script option is chosen from the Pythonscript menus.

Ziad Aborami

@Alan-Kilborn @PeterJones
Thanks so much, the python method works well!

@PeterJones
I was running the python from cmd with python.exe
I have created a new script and save it in Notepad++ scripts
When I have run it from scripts in Notepad++, it has worked well in 2 seconds without lagging.
Finally the problem was solved!

Ekopalypse

It is only needed to import from Npp if the current file isn’t the main file executed.
Like if you create a module or package.

Delete duplicated expressions with keeping the first one

@PeterJones Thanks for your notice, I will use the notation marks the next time and thanx for the help

@PeterJones
Thanks for your notice, I will use the notation marks the next time and thanx for the help