Paste every "say 37th line" apx..
-
Hey Thank you…You are awesome…thanks for all your help!! Defeinitely check out the faq…
BobM.
-
Just curious and maybe it can’t be done… but lets say I have 100 Fltsims and I want to be apostrophe’s at the beginning and end of the title line only…can that be done…here’s a sample:
[fltsim.1]
title=“JFAI_737_300_AirChina”
sim=TrafficGlobal
model=
panel=x
sound=
texture=AirChina
atc_id=B737
atc_flight_number=
atc_airline=AIR CHINA
atc_parking_codes=CCA
atc_parking_types=GATE,RAMP
ui_manufacturer=Boeing
ui_type=B733
ui_variation=Air China
description=AI
ui_typerole=Traffic Global AI
ui_createdby=Just Flight[fltsim.2]
title=“JFAI_737_300_AllNippon”
sim=TrafficGlobal
model=
panel=x
sound=
texture=AllNippon
atc_id=B737
atc_flight_number=
atc_airline=ALL NIPPON
atc_parking_codes=ANA
atc_parking_types=GATE,RAMP
ui_manufacturer=Boeing
ui_type=B733
ui_variation=All Nippon
description=AI
ui_typerole=Traffic Global AI
ui_createdby=Just FlightSo in other words…I would open the document in Notepad++ and want to put the apostrophe at the beginning and end of just the “Title line” for each fltsim section…1,2,3, etc… Might have to do a couple thousand of these…lol
i learned so much yesterday on the little I did that now I am dangerous!!!
BobM.
-
@Carolina-Number-1 said in Paste every "say 37th line" apx..:
So, presuming you have:
title=JFAI_737_300_AirChina
and you want that to be changed into:
title="JFAI_737_300_AirChina"
and that is the only thing you have on the line…
Then you could do:
find:
(?-s)^title=(.+)
repl:title="${1}"
mode: Regular expressionThere are of course some other ways, but this is probably the simplest, and I don’t think it is really worth showing a total noob some of the other ways at this point, because the confusion factor would just skyrocket.
-
Hey Thanks!! Never been called a a total noob before… I am so honored…lol
Warmest Greets…Stay Safe!!
BobM.
-
@Alan-Kilborn worked like a charm…zowie :)
BobM.
-
Hi, @carolina-number-1 and All,
I guess that you want to surround any text after the string
title =
with two double-quotes"
If so, this regex S/R is the right one :
SEARCH
(?-si)^(title\x20*=\x20*+)(?!")(.+)
REPLACE
\1"\2"
As usual :
-
Tick the
Wrap around
option and select theRegular expression
search mode -
Click, either, several times on the
Replace
button or once only on theReplace All
button
Notes :
-
The part
(?-si)^(title\x20*=\x20*)
selects the stringtitle
, with that exact case ((?-i)
), at beginning of line (^
), followed with the equal sign (=
), possibly preceded and/or followed with space char(s) (\x20*
) and stores all in group1
-
Remark that the
\x20*+
regex range of space chars, after the equal sign, defines an atomic structure. This means that no backtracking will be done, by the regex engine, in that range of spaces. In other words, this means : "search for possible space chars, after the=
sign, and verify, immediately that the next char is not a double-quote sign"
-
As said above, the part
(?!")
is a negative look-ahead structure. which tests, if, at current position, a"
symbol can be found. If not, the condition is considered as TRUE and the current match attempt is OK, so far -
Then, the part
(.+)
matches the remaining standard characters of current line and stores them as group2
-
The replacement part
\1"\2"
rewrites these two groups, with two doubles quotes surrounding the group2
Remark that the
(?!")
regex part avoids to surround an area, already surrounded with double-quotes, which would give, for instance, ““some text””, in case you would click twice on theReplace All
button@carolina-number-1, do not bother about
atomic
quantifiers andlook-around
structures, for the moment !, You have plenty of basic regex expressions to learn before ;-))Best Regards,
guy038
-
-
@guy038 Thank you!!
BobM.
-
@Alan-Kilborn said in Paste every "say 37th line" apx..:
I don’t think it is really worth showing a total noob some of the other ways at this point, because the confusion factor would just skyrocket.
It appears that I was disagreed with on the above point.
-
Hi, All,
I’m going to explain the benefit of the
atomic
quantifiers, by adding the+
symbol after the greedy quantifier !Let’s consider these four lines text below, with
2
without leading space chars and2
with four leading space chars :abc "abc" abc "abc"
And let’s suppose that we want to surround the string
abc
with double quotes, only in line1
and3
You could say that the following search regex
SEARCH
^(\x20*)(?!")(.+)
Would match the line
1
and3
, only. However, it also matches the fourth line ! Why ?
Well, a very important thing to remember, about regex engines, is that, regex engines try, by all means, to get an overall match. In other words, they, desperately, try to find a solution, by testing all the possible combinations, provided by the search regex !
So, let’s imagine the regex engine at beginning of the line
4
of our sample :-
Once the regex engine has consumed all the possible space chars (
^(\x20*)
), it tests if the next char is not a"
character. As it’s false, this means that the negative look-ahead return FALSE and no match can occur -
The regex engine don’t give up and backtracks, considering all space chars, but the last, as matching the
^(\x20*)
regex, too -
Thus, the next char is the last space character, which does match the last
.+
regex part and is not a double quote ! So, the(?!")
part return TRUE and the overall regex can match the fourth line. -
But we do not want this match as, after replacement, we would get
"" .......""
. So, in our regex, the solution is to use theatomic
quantifier*+
, instead of the greedy quantifier*
. Indeed, when the regex engine meets an atomic quantifier, it will never backtrack inside the quantified area !
SEARCH
^(\x20*+)(?!")(.+)
- Thus, after matching all the space chars, it just tests if the next char is not a
"
character. As it’s false, this means that the negative look-ahead is FALSE. But, as the backtracking feature is forbidden, the regex engine stops and returns no match , for the fourth line contents
As a summary, by preventing the regex engine from backtracking, the
atomic
quantifiers may reduce, drastically, the number of combinations, tested by the regex engine, and/or avoid testing some alternatives, particularly in recursive regexes.That leads to safer and quicker regexes’s execution !BR
guy038
-
-
Ok, Guy is putting on a “clinic”, in this case for “All”.
In that case, “Nice Job!”