CSS not working when I add it to multiple files using the Regular expression mode
-
@guy038 I had done exactly as you typed above and the parentheses did not get replicated where it had to be reproduced. The solution given by @Alan-Kilborn has now helped me fix it. Thanks anyway!
-
I see that this page is showing up in the search results of the search engines like Google and msn, so for the benefit of those landing on this webpage, let me tell you that I did as @guy038 typed above, then, I replaced
@media max-width: 480px
with@media max-width: \(480px\)
with the Regular expression mode and got this result:@media max-width: (480px)
which is what I wanted. -
Hello, @dr-ramaanand, @alan-kilborn and All,
Yes, @dr-ramaanand, you’re right : we have to escape the parentheses, but also to escape the
escape
character, too, if it occurs as a literal !!Thus, this is an UPDATED version of my previous post !
Ah…, of course, you cannot do it that way because when you try to insert a multi-line text into the Replace zone of the
Replace
,Find in Files
orFind in Projects
tab, you just get the very first line of your textFirst, I verified, from this link https://www.w3schools.com/html/html_css.asp, that the internal multi-lines CSS section (
<style>...........</style>
) is generally located, right before the HTML</head>
tagSo, I supposed that you want to insert the CSS part, below :
<style> .container { display: flex; } .container > div {} } @media (max-width: 480px) { .left { width: 150px; border-width:1px; border-style:solid; border-color:lightblue; padding-top:10px; } .right { width: 140px; border-top:1px solid lightblue; } } </style>
Right before the
</head>
tag of some of your HTML files, don’t you ?
If so, here is the correct way to insert a multi-lines text !
-
Copy all your CSS section in a new tab
-
Verify that the last line
</style>
is followed with a line-break -
Open the Replace dialog (
Ctrl + H
)-
Uncheck all box options
-
SEARCH
([()\\])|\R
-
REPLACE
?1\\\1:\\r\\n
-
Check the
Wrap around
option -
Select the
Regular expression
search mode -
Click on the
Replace All
button
-
You should get this text :
<style>\r\n.container {\r\n display: flex;\r\n}\r\n.container > div {}\r\n}\r\n@media \(max-width: 480px\) {\r\n.left {\r\n width: 150px;\r\n border-width:1px;\r\n border-style:solid;\r\n border-color:lightblue;\r\n padding-top:10px;\r\n}\r\n.right {\r\n width: 140px;\r\n border-top:1px solid lightblue;\r\n}\r\n}\r\n</style>\r\n
Now, in order to test my method :
- Copy this tiny HTML text, below, in an other new tab
<!DOCTYPE html> <html> <head> </head> <body> <h1>This is a heading</h1> <p>This is a paragraph.</p> </body> </html>
-
Re-open the Replace dialog (
Ctrl + H
)-
Uncheck all box options
-
SEARCH
(?-i)(?=</head>)
-
REPLACE
<style>\r\n.container {\r\n display: flex;\r\n}\r\n.container > div {}\r\n}\r\n@media \(max-width: 480px\) {\r\n.left {\r\n width: 150px;\r\n border-width:1px;\r\n border-style:solid;\r\n border-color:lightblue;\r\n padding-top:10px;\r\n}\r\n.right {\r\n width: 140px;\r\n border-top:1px solid lightblue;\r\n}\r\n}\r\n</style>\r\n
-
Check the
Wrap around
option -
Select the
Regular expression
search mode -
Click on the
Replace All
button
-
You should be left with your expected OUTPUT text :
<!DOCTYPE html> <html> <head> <style> .container { display: flex; } .container > div {} } @media (max-width: 480px) { .left { width: 150px; border-width:1px; border-style:solid; border-color:lightblue; padding-top:10px; } .right { width: 140px; border-top:1px solid lightblue; } } </style> </head> <body> <h1>This is a heading</h1> <p>This is a paragraph.</p> </body> </html>
Voila ;-))
IMPORTANT : Note that the method to change any multi-lines text ( with search =
([()\\])|\R
and replacement =?1\\\1:\\r\\n
) is not specific to your HTML case.It will, indeed, allow you to fill in the resulting
multi-lines
text into theReplace with :
zone, which will be inserted, identically, at the exact location defined in theFind what :
zone !!Best Regards,
guy038
-
-
@guy038 merci beaucoup!
-
It seems like your solution is a long route when the OP was looking for a short route.
Much shorter is what I guessed at and seemingly what the OP was already doing:
- select the replacement text in the editor
- press Ctrl+f
- swap Find what and Replace with (using the button)
- overwrite Find what
- “escape” any
(
or)
characters in Replace with - execute Replace in Files
-
Hello, @alan-kilborn and All,
Alan, I grant you : your idea is more direct and simpler than mine ;-))
However, let’s suppose that an OP is working on a
Lisp
program and that he wants to insert thisLisp
module which converts any roman number into its decimal equivalent numberFor instance, in
Lisp
, with the program below and the question(trad 'MCMXCV)
, it would return1995
( I do not know this language and I just suppose that it’s true ! )(de trad (Z) (cond ; \* ROMAN number -> DECIMAL number *\ (( eq Z 'I) 1) (( eq Z 'V) 5) (( eq Z 'X) 10) (( eq Z 'L) 50) (( eq Z 'C) 100) (( eq Z 'D) 500) (( eq Z 'M) 1000) ((atom Z) (trad (explodech Z))) ((null (cdr Z)) (trad (car Z))) ((< (trad (car Z)) (trad (cadr Z))) (- (trad (cdr Z)) (trad (car Z)))) (t (+ (trad (car Z)) (trad (cdr Z)) )) ))
No doubt that using my mehtod will be safer !!
Note that I included a LISP comment, which begins with a semi-colon, adding a comment with a
C-like
syntax in order to place anti-slashes in my example !After aplying the regex S/R :
-
SEARCH
([()\\])|\R
-
REPLACE
?1\\\1:\\r\\n
against this
List
module, you would get the text below, which could be correctly inserted, as it, in a largerLisp
program !\(de trad \(Z\) \(cond ; \\* ROMAN number -> DECIMAL number *\\\r\n \(\( eq Z 'I\) 1\)\r\n \(\( eq Z 'V\) 5\)\r\n \(\( eq Z 'X\) 10\)\r\n \(\( eq Z 'L\) 50\)\r\n \(\( eq Z 'C\) 100\)\r\n \(\( eq Z 'D\) 500\)\r\n \(\( eq Z 'M\) 1000\)\r\n \(\(atom Z\) \(trad \(explodech Z\)\)\)\r\n \(\(null \(cdr Z\)\) \(trad \(car Z\)\)\)\r\n \(\(< \(trad \(car Z\)\) \(trad \(cadr Z\)\)\)\r\n \(- \(trad \(cdr Z\)\) \(trad \(car Z\)\)\)\)\r\n \(t \(+ \(trad \(car Z\)\) \(trad \(cdr Z\)\) \)\) \)\)\r\n
Best Regards,
guy038
Well, this example is a bit “far-fetched”, but, as I knew that the
Lisp
language abuses parentheses, I couldn’t resist ! LOL -
-
@guy038 said in CSS not working when I add it to multiple files using the Regular expression mode:
No doubt that using my method will be safer !!
Understood.
I was just trying to help OP by sticking with his exact problem.
It’s fine to present more complicated situations in follow-on discussions, as you did. -
@guy038 The gist of the matter is that parentheses, that is rounded, simple brackets have to be escaped with a backslash like
\(
and\)
or else they will be skipped during any replacement -
@dr-ramaanand said in CSS not working when I add it to multiple files using the Regular expression mode:
The gist of the matter is that parentheses…
Perhaps equally important for possible future readers of this topic is showing a technique to get multiline text into the Replace with box! :-)
-
For those who’ve searched online and come here, let me tell you that I had already made the mistake of not escaping the parentheses, just as @guy038 gave as a solution first which was faulty as it skipped adding the parentheses. I had ended up with
@media max-width: 480px {
. However, you need not fret if you have made the same mistake, just put@media max-width: 480px
in the Find field, select the Regular expression mode, put@media \(max-width: 480px\)
and hit the Replace in files button and you will end up with the correct result which is@media (max-width: 480px) {
-
@Alan-Kilborn said in CSS not working when I add it to multiple files using the Regular expression mode:
Perhaps equally important for possible future readers of this topic is showing a technique to get multiline text into the Replace with box! :-)
Yes, for multiple lines to be added, we have to put
Line1\r\nLine2\r\nLine3\r\nLine4
in the Replace in files field to get one line below the other. -
@dr-ramaanand said:
for multiple lines to be added, we have to put Line1\r\nLine2\r\nLine3\r\nLine4
OK, so now any possible benefit of the original technique is probably lost to future readers. :-(