Community
    • Login

    Search++ (\W)'(\w) regex replace failure

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Notepad++ & Plugin Development
    49 Posts 6 Posters 4.3k Views 1 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • mpheathM Offline
      mpheath @M Andre Z Eckenrode
      last edited by mpheath

      @M-Andre-Z-Eckenrode I may not fully understand the regex task with using groups when ' can be at the start of a line with a word character following as to \W can match the preceding LineFeed character. The LineFeed character seems unwise to capture in my opinion. \W can change behavior depending on encoding so might be challenging to use so perhaps if can be avoided, then that might be better.

      The find pattern of \B'\b and replace with ’ might be safer to use as to using anchors to qualify the match instead of consuming with groups which may need more complex conditional handling.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • guy038G Online
        guy038
        last edited by guy038

        Hello, @m-andre-z-eckenrode, @coises, @mpheath and All,

        @mpheath, you said :

        The find pattern of \B'\b and replace with ’ might be safer to use as to using anchors to qualify the match instead of consuming with groups which may need more complex conditional handling.

        I totally agree with this statement !

        That is why I proposed, in my initial post, this alternate formulation :

        FIND (?<=\W)'(?=\w)

        REPLACE ’

        which do not contain any group !


        Indeed, the \B'\b and (?<=\W)'(?=\w) Find regexes are equivalent and a Replace All operation would change this INPUT text, below :

        
        't'e's't' 't'o' 's'e'e' 't'h'e' 'm'a't'c'h'e's'
        
        

        By this one :

        
        ’t'e's't' ’t'o' ’s'e'e' ’t'h'e' ’m'a't'c'h'e's'
        
        

        In other words, any single quote char, preceded by a non-word char and followed with a word char, is changed into the ’ character ( \x{2019} RIGHT SINGLE QUOTATION MARK )

        Best Regards,

        guy038

        M Andre Z EckenrodeM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
        • M Andre Z EckenrodeM Offline
          M Andre Z Eckenrode @guy038
          last edited by

          @mpheath & @guy038

          Thanks much for the suggestions, though as stated in my other similar topic, which isn’t specific to Search++, I already found and used a working alternate method to achieve what I wanted, and only really started that topic to try to understand why the (\W)'(\w) method did NOT work, while THIS topic is only really to report the aberrant replacements seemingly caused by Search++.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • M Andre Z EckenrodeM Offline
            M Andre Z Eckenrode @Coises
            last edited by

            @Coises

            For what it’s worth, I asked my brother, whom I know also uses Notepad++, to indulge me by repeating my Search++ regex experiments on his own computer, and he kindly did so after encountering some initial problems getting Search++ to work at all (see below for details of that). Anyway, he used a fresh portable copy with the latest versions of both, as I have, and reports getting one anomalous replacement while stepping through a text field made up of 11 copies of my recently reported example text. I think that duplicating the problem almost invariably requires many matches and replacement attempts, since it’s so hit or miss for whatever reason.

            About my brother’s initial failures to get Search++ to load in his portable copy: His first four or so tries were attempted in different virtual machines on his computer, including the very first one being Windows 11’s built-in “Sandbox”. All of them failed with messages such as “The specified module could not be found” and “Search++.dll is not compatible with the current version of Notepad++”. But when he tried the same set of files on his real machine, it worked. He routinely runs various other programs in virtual machines just fine.

            CoisesC 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • CoisesC Online
              Coises @M Andre Z Eckenrode
              last edited by

              @M-Andre-Z-Eckenrode said:
              For what it’s worth, I asked my brother, whom I know also uses Notepad++, to indulge me by repeating my Search++ regex experiments on his own computer, and he kindly did so after encountering some initial problems getting Search++ to work at all (see below for details of that). Anyway, he used a fresh portable copy with the latest versions of both, as I have, and reports getting one anomalous replacement while stepping through a text field made up of 11 copies of my recently reported example text. I think that duplicating the problem almost invariably requires many matches and replacement attempts, since it’s so hit or miss for whatever reason.

              Thank you, and thanks to your brother!

              Is he also using 32-bit Notepad++?

              About my brother’s initial failures to get Search++ to load in his portable copy: His first four or so tries were attempted in different virtual machines on his computer, including the very first one being Windows 11’s built-in “Sandbox”. All of them failed with messages such as “The specified module could not be found” and “Search++.dll is not compatible with the current version of Notepad++”. But when he tried the same set of files on his real machine, it worked. He routinely runs various other programs in virtual machines just fine.

              I just tried the same thing in Windows 10 Sandbox on my system and it also failed, with the same message. I will have to investigate that. Off the top of my head, I don’t know why that would happen. My guess (that’s all it is for now) is there’s some sort of C++ runtime dependency that nearly everyone has installed on their main machines, but that doesn’t carry over automatically to a virtual machine or a sandbox.

              M Andre Z EckenrodeM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • M Andre Z EckenrodeM Offline
                M Andre Z Eckenrode @Coises
                last edited by

                @Coises said:

                Is he also using 32-bit Notepad++?

                His routinely-used copy is v8.9.3 x64 portable.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • CoisesC Online
                  Coises @M Andre Z Eckenrode
                  last edited by

                  @M-Andre-Z-Eckenrode said:

                  About my brother’s initial failures to get Search++ to load in his portable copy: His first four or so tries were attempted in different virtual machines on his computer, including the very first one being Windows 11’s built-in “Sandbox”. All of them failed with messages such as “The specified module could not be found” and “Search++.dll is not compatible with the current version of Notepad++”. But when he tried the same set of files on his real machine, it worked.

                  At least I was able to figure out the cause of this problem. The ICU (International Components for Unicode) libraries that I use require a specific Microsoft redistributable library. I never noticed, and most people probably have it installed already as part of installing something else, just as I do. It doesn’t automatically carry over to virtual machines or sandboxes, though.

                  There are a couple potential solutions (and if nothing else works out, I can at least explain in the readme how to install the redistributable). Thank you for reporting this.

                  M Andre Z EckenrodeM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • M Andre Z EckenrodeM Offline
                    M Andre Z Eckenrode @Coises
                    last edited by

                    @Coises said:

                    At least I was able to figure out the cause of this problem.

                    Glad to hear that worked out.

                    @Coises said:

                    Have you ever noticed arbitrary junk character replacements with any other regular expression / replacement pairs, or only with this particular one?

                    I just tried a somewhat different regex experiment. I copied a list of words beginning with the letter a from a web page and pasted them into N++, then utilized Find (\W)a(\w) and Replace \1z\2 and stepped through. Out of 221 words, 21 replacements resulted in letters other than z being substituted for a. In a few cases, there was a letter other than z, followed by z itself, and followed again by another non-z letter. In a few other cases, extra line breaks were inserted mid-word. Note that in this experiment, no dashes (-) were inserted, as they often were in my previous experiments involving ' and ’. Presumably, that’s some sort of clue.

                    M Andre Z EckenrodeM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • M Andre Z EckenrodeM Offline
                      M Andre Z Eckenrode @M Andre Z Eckenrode
                      last edited by

                      @Coises

                      And just now tried Find (\w)a(\w) and Replace \1z\2 with the same list of words, which definitely resulted in at least one anomalous replacement (average became avevzie), possibly more, but the mistakes are more difficult to spot at a glance in this case.

                      CoisesC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • CoisesC Online
                        Coises @M Andre Z Eckenrode
                        last edited by

                        @M-Andre-Z-Eckenrode said:

                        @Coises

                        And just now tried Find (\w)a(\w) and Replace \1z\2 with the same list of words, which definitely resulted in at least one anomalous replacement (average became avevzie), possibly more, but the mistakes are more difficult to spot at a glance in this case.

                        I hate continuing to bother you about this with different questions, but I am so stumped. Have you noticed:

                        1. Do bad substitutions happen if the document is set as UTF-8, or is it specific to ANSI? (For a test, just use Encoding | Convert to UTF-8 on a document containing your test text before trying to Replace.)

                        2. Have you ever seen a bad replacement where the replacement string did not use a capturing group reference (like \1 or \2 or $1 or $2)?

                        M Andre Z EckenrodeM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • M Andre Z EckenrodeM Offline
                          M Andre Z Eckenrode @Coises
                          last edited by

                          @Coises said:

                          Do bad substitutions happen if the document is set as UTF-8, or is it specific to ANSI?

                          I’ve experienced it with both at this point.

                          Have you ever seen a bad replacement where the replacement string did not use a capturing group reference

                          Not that I’ve noticed so far.

                          New test:

                          I used the same list of words, but inserted the number 2 between the second and third letters of all words that consisted of at least three letters, then stepped through using Find ([a-z])\d([a-z]) and Replace \1\2. There are anomalies. Examples include:

                          ac2ademic became adjdemic

                          ad2ministration became a
                          ginistration

                          CoisesC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • CoisesC Online
                            Coises @M Andre Z Eckenrode
                            last edited by

                            @M-Andre-Z-Eckenrode

                            I think I may have found the cause.

                            Would you try installing this version:

                            https://github.com/Coises/SearchPlusPlus/releases/tag/v0.6.3.2

                            and see if the problem goes away?

                            If the problem is what I think it is, this will make it go away. It isn’t a good solution (it will cause serious inefficiency for large files), but if you no longer see the problem with this version, I’ll know I’ve almost certainly identified the cause, and I can work on a proper resolution.

                            Thank you so much for all your effort.

                            M Andre Z EckenrodeM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • M Andre Z EckenrodeM Offline
                              M Andre Z Eckenrode @Coises
                              last edited by

                              @Coises said:

                              Would you try installing this version

                              With v0.6.3.2 in place, I re-ran several of the tests I’ve been doing, and found no anomalies this time, so that seems to have taken care of it. Thank YOU! Out of curiosity, is there any kind of basic explanation you can relay in layman’s terms for why it was doing what it was doing?

                              CoisesC 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 2
                              • CoisesC Online
                                Coises @M Andre Z Eckenrode
                                last edited by

                                @M-Andre-Z-Eckenrode said:
                                With v0.6.3.2 in place, I re-ran several of the tests I’ve been doing, and found no anomalies this time, so that seems to have taken care of it. Thank YOU!

                                Thank you. This error has been there since I first designed this regular expression search technique, in Columns++. It just apparently only shows up in rare circumstances. I’ve still never seen it.

                                Out of curiosity, is there any kind of basic explanation you can relay in layman’s terms for why it was doing what it was doing?

                                Notepad++ uses an open source component called Scintilla to display editable text. Scintilla maintains the text in an internal “split buffer,” meaning that there can be a gap at an arbitrary position within the text. It uses that gap to be able to make changes that add or remove characters in the middle of the text without having to copy all the following text to a new location every time there’s one small change.

                                For a few reasons, when I implemented search, I wanted to use the same regular expression engine that Notepad++ uses, Boost.regex, but I wanted to include my own copy in the plugin and manage it directly, rather than going through the hybrid Scintilla/Boost interface that Notepad++ exposes, and I wanted to access the Scintilla split buffer directly. To do that, I had to create something called iterators.

                                In C++, an iterator is essentially an indirect way of referencing data that has simple operations like “move to the next character” and “tell me what character you’re pointed at.” I designed iterators for UTF-8, for single-byte character set ANSI and for double-byte character set ANSI that could traverse the Scintilla buffer, mind the gap, and return the results to the Boost.regex engine as if it were seeing a contiguous string of UTF-32 Unicode characters, regardless of the actual encoding.

                                Now, there’s a caveat when you ask Scintilla for the location of its internal buffer positions. You get two segments (because of the gap). But Scintilla warns that you can’t trust those positions once you do anything else in Scintilla, or once any user interaction is possible (even if the user doesn’t change the text). So I made sure to “invalidate” my internal pointers whenever control left my plugin: such as between finding text and changing it.

                                In order to ask Boost.regex for the replacement string when doing a change, I have to keep a particular Boost.regex structure that references the original match, so it knows how to interpret capture group substitutions. I was careful to invalidate the buffer pointers before I called Boost.regex.format. Except…

                                The match structure in Boost.regex doesn’t store the Scintilla character positions of the match. It stores iterators. And the iterators I designed, to be as efficient as possible, hold copies of the pointers into the Scintilla split buffer. So invalidating the pointers I use to generate iterators for Boost.regex does nothing to the iterators Boost.regex already stored in the match structure.

                                For reasons I can’t guess, both you and your brother seem to have something about your systems that causes Scintilla to reposition the gap in its internal buffer between find and replace. It never seems to happen here, but I finally realized that my attempt to protect against that happening is ineffective.

                                What I did to test was add a Scintilla call each time I invalidate the buffer pointers that causes Scintilla to move everything to the beginning and put the gap at the end. That means all the iterators will have the same pointers. It’s not a good long-term solution, though, because in a large file moving the gap to the end every single time anything changes could make response sluggish.

                                So it might take me a little while to decide on the best solution. I’m glad you documented the error so well. Now I know what to fix, I just have to work out the best way to do it.

                                M Andre Z EckenrodeM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 6
                                • M Andre Z EckenrodeM Offline
                                  M Andre Z Eckenrode @Coises
                                  last edited by

                                  Thank you, @Coises, and best wishes for a long-term solution.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • CoisesC Online
                                    Coises @M Andre Z Eckenrode
                                    last edited by

                                    @M-Andre-Z-Eckenrode:

                                    Search++ version 0.6.4 should also fix this, but in a way that won’t impact efficiency in very large files.

                                    When you have a chance to check, please let me know if you find that it fails. I don’t think it will… but since I can’t reproduce the bug, I can’t be certain.

                                    (I have not yet addressed the problem that caused Search++ to fail to load for your brother in Windows Sandbox and in virtual machines. I understand the cause, I just have to decide how to deal with it.)

                                    Thank you so much for all your help!

                                    Alan KilbornA M Andre Z EckenrodeM 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                    • Alan KilbornA Offline
                                      Alan Kilborn @Coises
                                      last edited by

                                      @Coises said:

                                      …fail…in virtual machines

                                      I’m somewhat curious about this, because, well, isn’t the idea of a VM that it runs the same as a real machine? If it doesn’t, isn’t it a lot less useful? OK, sure, it doesn’t run strictly the same entirely, but I’d say running an app, e.g. N++, either under a VM or not should produce the same results for the user.

                                      I’ve run Notepad++ exclusively under a VM for 3+ years now, and have never noticed any behavior that was odd. I guess what I’m looking for is that you did something really “oddball” in your plugin, and that in general I have no reason to be concerned.

                                      CoisesC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                      • M Andre Z EckenrodeM Offline
                                        M Andre Z Eckenrode @Coises
                                        last edited by

                                        @Coises said:

                                        Search++ version 0.6.4 should also fix this

                                        I’m happy to report that I’ve encountered no further anomalies during the course of several tests while using v0.6.4. You’re quite welcome, and thank YOU again.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                        • CoisesC Online
                                          Coises @Alan Kilborn
                                          last edited by Coises

                                          @Alan-Kilborn said:
                                          I’ve run Notepad++ exclusively under a VM for 3+ years now, and have never noticed any behavior that was odd. I guess what I’m looking for is that you did something really “oddball” in your plugin, and that in general I have no reason to be concerned.

                                          Running in a VM or the Windows Sandbox was just an indirect cause. The real cause was the absence of a Visual C runtime redistributable library.

                                          I reproduced the problem immediately in Windows 10 Sandbox, and I’m confident the cause in his brother’s virtual machines was the same. Most people have installed that runtime on a general purpose machine at some time or other as a side-effect of installing one application or another.

                                          In a program with a proper installer, the installer would check for the presence of required libraries and start an installer for any missing libraries. (I’m sure you’ve seen that.) A Notepad++ plugin can’t really do that. Normally we just compile with everything statically linked.

                                          The reason for the dependency is that I’m currently using pre-compiled versions of the ICU libraries. Those libraries, in turn, dynamically link to the Visual C runtime.

                                          I think the proper solution to this must be to include the ICU source as a second project in my Visual Studio solution and compile everything with static linkage. I’m just not sure how to do that yet: I don’t think ICU has a drop-in project for a VS solution that uses MS Build, and as it happens, I know next to nothing about build systems. :-(

                                          The next most proper would be to say something in the readme that if the plugin won’t load, it could be because you need to install these libraries.

                                          Another possibility would be to use Windows’ version of ICU. That would mean being behind the latest version (Windows doesn’t routinely update its version of the libraries) and for certain not working on Windows versions earlier than Windows 10 version 1703. At present, Search++ doesn’t appear to work on Windows 7 anyway (I’m unsure about Windows 8/8.1); that appears also to be a result of using the ICU DLLs, and it might be resolvable if I compile them as part of the plugin; at present, I don’t know.

                                          The simplest way would be to include the redistributable libraries in the zip file. At the least, that would technically be a GPL violation, since those libraries are not released under a GPL-compatible license. (As I understand it, you can depend on system libraries, but you can’t include a library in your distribution and claim it falls under the system library exception.) Aside from technicalities, I’m unsure if there might be other pitfalls to doing that.

                                          sevem47S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                          • sevem47S Offline
                                            sevem47 @Coises
                                            last edited by

                                            @Coises said:

                                            Search++ doesn’t appear to work on Windows 7 anyway

                                            Just for your information; this is something I can NOT confirm. For me Search++ even runs on my old, not up to date Windows 7 machine (see below debug info). Perhaps this is as well a question of having all the “correct libraries” to be able to run the plugin. If you want some further information, just tell me and I will see if I can provide you more details (but it is not a development machine; I just use it for writing documents).

                                            Notepad++ v8.9.7   (32-bit)
                                            Build time: Jul 14 2026 - 01:11:31
                                            Scintilla/Lexilla included: 5.6.4/5.5.1
                                            Boost Regex included: 1_90
                                            pugixml included: 1.16
                                            nlohmann JSON included: 3.12.0
                                            Path: C:\ProgramData\UserApp\Notepad++\notepad++.exe
                                            Command Line: 
                                            Admin mode: OFF
                                            Local Conf mode: OFF
                                            Cloud Config: OFF
                                            WinGUp: absent
                                            disableNppAutoUpdate.xml: present
                                            Periodic Backup: OFF
                                            Placeholders: OFF
                                            Scintilla Rendering Mode: SC_TECHNOLOGY_DEFAULT (0)
                                            Multi-instance Mode: monoInst
                                            asNotepad: OFF
                                            File Status Auto-Detection: cdEnabledNew (for current file/tab only)
                                            Dark Mode: OFF
                                            Display Info:
                                                primary monitor: 1024x600, scaling 100%
                                                visible monitors count: 1
                                                installed Display Class adapters: 
                                                    0000: Description - Intel(R) Graphics Media Accelerator 3150
                                                    0000: DriverVersion - 8.14.10.2117
                                                    0001: Description - Intel(R) Graphics Media Accelerator 3150
                                                    0001: DriverVersion - 8.14.10.2117
                                            OS Name: Windows 7 Starter (32-bit)
                                            OS Build: 7601.0
                                            Current ANSI codepage: 1252
                                            Plugins: 
                                                ComparePlus (3)
                                                DSpellCheck (1.5)
                                                MarkdownViewerPlusPlus (0.8.2)
                                                mimeTools (3.1)
                                                NppConverter (4.7)
                                                NppExport (0.4)
                                                NPPJSONViewer (2.1.1)
                                                PoorMansTSqlFormatterNppPlugin (1.6.13.31502)
                                                Search++ (0.6.4)
                                                XMLTools (3.1.1.13)
                                            
                                            
                                            CoisesC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1

                                            Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                            Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                            With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                            Register Login
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            The Community of users of the Notepad++ text editor.
                                            Powered by NodeBB | Contributors