Community
    • Login

    Help with regex

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Help wanted · · · – – – · · ·
    19 Posts 3 Posters 12.9k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Claudia FrankC
      Claudia Frank
      last edited by

      good to see you did it ;-)

      Have a nice day
      Claudia

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • DaveyDD
        DaveyD
        last edited by

        Hi Claudia, thanks
        I hadn’t seen your post when I wrote mine!

        Regarding association, I did it by userDefinedLang ID
        (By the way… thanks for that too! I couldn’t live without it! :)
        [still waiting and hoping for version 3!] )

        Thanks
        David

        (P.S. My replies are delayed since my reputation is under 2… :( - :) )

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • guy038G
          guy038
          last edited by guy038

          Hi, Davey and Claudia,

          I understood why the regex ^=+\s+\K.+[^\s](?= ) is correct and the regex =+\s+\K.+[^\s](?= ), without the ^ character, is NOT correct

          Just imagine the subject text, below :

          =======      MY FIRST SECTION      ===================
          =======      MY SECOND SECTION      ===================
          

          You have to remember that the regex \s is stricly identical to the regex [\t\n\x0B\f\r\x20\xA0]


          So, if you consider the wrong regex =+\s+\K.+[^\s](?= )

          • A first click, on the Find Next button, matches the text MY FIRST SECTION. Nice !

          • A second click, on the Find Next button, matches, wrongly, the string ======= MY SECOND SECTION. Why ?

          Well, after the first click, the cursor is located between the last letter N and the space, in the first line


          So, that wrong regex =+\s+\K.+[^\s](?= ) matches :

          • The =================== string, at the end of the first line, due to the regex =+

          • The EOL characters ( \r\n ) of the first line, which are, both, \s characters !

          • The \K form forget the present regex, so the cursor is reset between the \n of the first line and the first = character of the second line

          • Then, after backtracking, the ======= MY SECOND SECTIO string, due to the .+ part of the regex

          • Finally, the N character, as it’s a NON BLANK character ( [^\s] )

          • The space character, although not part of the final regex, must be present, after the last N character, of the second line : that’s right

          On the contrary, after the first match, when we use the regex ^=+\s+\K.+[^\s](?= ), the cursor location is correctly reset, first, at the beginning of the second line !

          Cheers,

          guy038

          Claudia FrankC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • Claudia FrankC
            Claudia Frank @guy038
            last edited by

            Hello guy038,

            thank you for the detailed and good explanation.
            When creating a regex I’m still don’t care enough about the current cursor position and the correct meaning of parts
            of the regex like \K. Like you said, it is not only the reset but als the forget the previous matches which is important.
            But I hope this gets done when doing more and more of these. Yesterday I found a nice webpage
            which supports me understanding my regexes ;-)

            Cheers
            Claudia

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • DaveyDD
              DaveyD
              last edited by

              Hi guy038
              Thanks for the extra clarity that you provided - as you always do!

              All the best
              Davey

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • guy038G
                guy038
                last edited by

                Hello, Claudia and DaveyD,

                I had a look to the webpage, that you found out Claudia. Really interesting, indeed !

                However, in order to get the same matches than the Notepad++ regex engine, we should take care about the following points, when using the site :

                https://regex101.com


                • We must use the default PCRE flavor, on the left part of the window, which seems to have the closest behaviour than the N++ regex engine

                • In the gmixXsuUAJ field, you should, systematically, add the two modifiers gm

                  • The g modifier means it will indicate all the matches of the test regex, and not only the first one ! ( just like the Find All button of the Mark tab ! )

                  • The m modifier means that the anchors ^ and $ represent the beginning and the end of each line, as the N++ regex engine does ( implicit modifier (?m) )

                • In the gmixXsuUAJ field, you will add the i modifier, if you DON’T check the Match case option OR if your N++ regex begins with the (?i) form

                • In the gmixXsuUAJ field, you will add the s modifier, if you have CHECKED the . matches newline option OR if your N++ regex begins with the (?s) form

                • In the gmixXsuUAJ field, you will add the x modifier, if your N++ regex begins with the form (?x)

                • In the gmixXsuUAJ field, you will NOT indicate the m modifier, if your N++ regex begins with the form (?-m)


                So, giving our last example of the test string, below,

                =======      MY FIRST SECTION      ===================
                =======      MY SECOND SECTION      ===================
                
                • If you enter the regex =+\s+\K.+[^\s](?= ), in the Regular Expression field and gm after the slash, in the modifiers field, you should have the strings MY FIRST SECTION and ======= MY SECOND SECTION, both, highlighted in blue

                • Now, just add the ^ anchor, at the beginning of the regex -> This time, you should have the two strings MY FIRST SECTION and MY SECOND SECTION, both, highlighted in blue !

                Cheers,

                guy038

                Claudia FrankC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • Claudia FrankC
                  Claudia Frank @guy038
                  last edited by

                  Hi guy038,

                  thanky you very much for the infos. I was looking for a boost:regex tester but couldn’t find anyone.
                  So with this site and your explanation it makes it easier to find the misunderstandings when using
                  regexes.

                  Cheers
                  Claudia

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • DaveyDD
                    DaveyD
                    last edited by

                    Hi Loreia,
                    Just to mention, when I first started, I found a website (similar to the one you mentioned above) that was really helpful, and I liked it mostly because they had a desktop app that included the same features!
                    You can take a here http://regexr.com/
                    I think the download is somewhere else www.gskinner.com - however, this is from memory
                    I’m not saying that this is better than what you found, but just another nice option with a desktop app.

                    I think everything guy038 mentioned above applies here too, except that here, the g modifier is enabled by default

                    Davey

                    Claudia FrankC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • Claudia FrankC
                      Claudia Frank @DaveyD
                      last edited by

                      Loreia ?? Did some UDL lately??
                      Yeah, https://github.com/gskinner/regexr/
                      Worth a try

                      Thanks and cheers
                      Claudia

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • DaveyDD
                        DaveyD
                        last edited by

                        :) Yes, I did! - Sorry about that confusion!

                        Let me know what you think - I thought it was great and it really helped me in the beginning.

                        All the best
                        Davey

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        The Community of users of the Notepad++ text editor.
                        Powered by NodeBB | Contributors