Plugin built with VS 2013 Express vs. Plugin built with VS 2013 Community

Yaron

Hello Claudia,

Thanks again. :)

Using the latest commit - wrong results.

A few minuets ago I downloaded the source up to this commit and got correct results.

I think the problem started here. I can test again and verify it.

Best regards.

Claudia Frank

Yaron, could you post your compare.ini?

Cheers
Claudia

Yaron

Hello Claudia,

Compare.ini.

Thank you very much.

BR

Yaron

Hello again,

The problem starts in this commit.

Thank you.

BR

Claudia Frank

This is were I currently investigate, to be more precise I assume the issue in addBlankSection.

Cheers
Claudia

Yaron

You’re amazing.

On one hand I think that it’s too much, but on the other hand I don’t want you to stop. :)

I was about to start investigating it myself; I was overwhelmed by the scale of the unfamiliar code.

Thank you very much!

BR

Claudia Frank

It might be that this was a hasty reaction as it could be that the function already got the wrong value.
What I can say so far is that the inserttext from addBlankSection

::SendMessage(window, SCI_INSERTTEXT, posAdd, (LPARAM)buff.data());

only gets one '\r\n”

{'text': '\r\n',            'modificationType': 0x11,      'linesAdded': 1, 'length': 2, 'position': 3, 'line': 0 }

whereas my dll gets three

{'text': '\r\n\r\n\r\n',    'modificationType': 0x11,      'linesAdded': 3, 'length': 6, 'position': 3, 'line': 0 }

Test was done with two files, one having

1
5

whereas the other has

It is most likely that I need your help to find out what the problem is, meaning
you need to do some debugging as well. But not for today, I need to have a rest.
Maybe we can go on tomorrow?

Cheers
Claudia

Yaron

Good morning Claudia,

I hope you’re reading these lines after having a good and refreshing rest.

I find it difficult to enlarge the variety of my thanks expressions.
So, many thanks again. :)

I’ve never used the Debugger.
Bear with me.

Have a great day.

Claudia Frank

Hello Yaron,

The problem is generated by a compiler bug. It tries to optimize a little bit too much. ;-)

Either disable optimization, by right clicking on compare in project explorer,
properties -> C/C++ -> all options -> Optimization and change its value

or the preferred way

update your visual studio 2013 to latest version. ;-)

Cheers
Claudia

Yaron

Hello Claudia,

You never cease to amaze me.
I take my hat off. Oracle Claudia!

Thank you so much. I’m truly grateful.

Could you please enlighten me and explain briefly how you got it?
I hope it’s not a trade secret. :)

Best regards.

Claudia Frank

Hello Yaron,

no, it isn’t a trade secret ;-) - but it wasn’t really a clever job, it was just an eliminating process and LUCK.

I only tell you the steps which lead to the finding not the many wasted miserable steps I’ve done before. ;-)

After I didn’t find any obvious issues which could explain reported behavior I thought about the differences of your
and mine environment. After that I setup an windows 7 32 bit with visual studio 2013. Downloaded source and compiled it.
Tested it and it worked. Even more confused as I expected it to fail. Thought about it again and started comparing yours and mine.
Same W7, same VS2013, same source -> different results.
Same W7 (?) -> didn’t install all updates -> didn’t use Hebrew = keep in mind
VS2013 -> same
source-> same, you did even test it with different npp version as I read.
So it must be W7 -> why??? Did a search on the internet about reporting problem with VS2013 and non-english language.
Results, but nothing pointing to such an issue.
Then I did a search about problems with visual studio and having different language. And while scanning the result
I saw one who had an issue installing an update - that’s where I started thinking about different version.
I had VS2013 update 4 already so I gave it a chance and -> compiled the source and tested it -> problem was the same.

You see, no rocket science.

Cheers
Claudia

Yaron

Hello Claudia,

Thank you for the explanation. You know, men can get curious too. :)

And now I just can’t help it.
After explaining the process of reasoning leading to her famous deductions, Shirley Holmes’ insights seemed to lose some of their former glamour.
But then on a second thought the shine became even brighter.

Well, I assumed you had performed some searches and tests.
Now that I know the scale of those actions, my gratitude grows and deepens.

And finally, rocket science would be no “rocket science” for you. :)

Best regards.