Comment line style for user defined language
-
Hello,
Thank you for further investing it. I appreciate that.
Thank you for testing and confirming. Appreciated.
Dear @Claudia-Frank is a lady. I made this mistake too. :)BR
-
Thanks Claudia. :)
-
-
I owe you many thanks for your kind help on the forum.
The last one was for the up-voting. :) -
and I upvoted as you are so attentive to see this little mistake.
Cheers
Claudia -
And here I owe you again: thanks. :)
-
as I do - I assume this can go the whole night :-D
Cheers
Claudia -
I thought so too!
Good night. :) -
Unfortunate, tomorrow - I have to stay up early, otherwise … ;-D
Good night.
Cheers
Claudia -
I’ll take a rain-check on it. :)
Have a good sleep and a nice day.
-
Hello @Claudia-Frank and @Yaron ,
The issue with the CP toolbar icons initial state is fixed here: https://github.com/pnedev/compare-plugin/commit/e11d59f956d3ffcc08fb3f830834dece83d2a5bb.
The problem was with the moment the initial state of the toolbar icons was set - it shouldn’t be when the icons are registered but rather after all N++ initialization is done.
Thanks.BR
-
-
Hi, I am not getting any approach to run np++ on my macintosh, is there any exit plan to run it on My macintosh. Plz help, thx ahead of time,
Respects,
Roch (PSL T20 Live)
-
please be patient
i’ve been granted permission to port notepad++ to mac os x 10.10.x - 10.14.x by @donho a while ago.
it is in it’s final stages and all of the 7.5.8 code is working without any issues.
(7.5.9 should be too, but we’ve not tested everything we know that could produce an issue yet)currently i’ve just finished the high-dpi (retina 2x) implementation routine to let the users decide, whether they prefer high-dpi 200% scaling to be anti aliased in a 2x2 square or if they want retro squared pixels.
-
@Meta-Chuh said:
permission to port notepad++ to mac os x 10.10.x - 10.14.x by @donho
Ooooh…I want this! :-)
-
permission to port notepad++ to mac os x 10.10.x - 10.14.x by @donho
First, it is awesome that you asked and apparently received permission to do this. I understand the open source concept where you don’t have to ask permission, but when you don’t and don’t give your new thing a distinctive name (see later posts in https://notepad-plus-plus.org/community/topic/14734/notepad-uwp-package-in-windows-store-almost-there) and you put it in a mainstream distribution channel, that is lousy IMO.
Second, I presume this port is not going to exist in the same source as the existing Notepad++? Although it would be great if it could… If it is not going to be part of the existing source code, is it (I hope) going to have a distinctive new name? (Although I suppose Notepad++ for Mac will suffice if nothing more inventive comes to mind)
-
I’m curious, does the idea of a Mac port still seem workable there?
I’m asking not in a ‘are you done yet?’ way - but more generally speaking, at the technical level, is the new code and all dependencies looking like they should compile/work at the end of the process? I’m imagining there must be quite a bit of build errors/warnings to sift through!
It certainly would be appreciated by a lot of folks I’m sure. I was just looking at using WineBottler to install on my work Macbook when I came across this post. Right now I’m using Textmate at work and Notepad++ at home, and switching between the two is causing my poor fingers some confusion.
PS - Happy New Year!