Compare plugin started from CMD: comparison won't start automatically since N++ 7.6.6
-
correct me if I’m wrong but I understood that this is what OP did in first place and
seems not to work in 7.6.6 (maybe since 7.6) anymore. -
I tried your How-To but it didn’t work. Notepad++ starts up and the two files are loaded, but no comparison takes place.
I used the debug option of the settings file which makes it possible to view the debug output using DbgView by Sysinternals. It seems Compare.exe can not find the
Plugins/Compare/Compare
menu entry. It findsPlugins/Compare
and then only finds theDetect Moves
entry repeatedly.I have tried it with german and english locale for Npp’s UI and also removed the keyboard shortcut for the
Compare
submenu entry - no success. My Npp version is 7.5.6.If somebody is interested in a complete solution using the method @Ekopalypse found above - I wrote a Batch script and a VBS launcher for it (to avoid flickering console windows). The VBS launcher could be integrated into the Explorer context menu. It is able to process two files at once or it can be called twice with only one file each.
-
Hello all,
Is another instance of Notepad++ running when you start the compare.exe launcher?
The compare launcher (compare.exe) starts Notepad++ in multi-instance mode.I just looked at the compare launcher (compare.exe) source code and it should work with notepad versions above version 6.
The compare is triggered by searching forCompare
plugins menu andCompare
command which should both exist for Compare v2 and since the command ID is traced by name the menu ordering shouldn’t matter.Since the problem is with Notepad v7.6.6 I wonder if there is some kind of regression in its version API message.
Can somebody who has installed Notepad++ 7.6.6 try sending NPPM_GETNPPVERSION (through PythonScript for example) and share what he/she gets from it?
This issue aside, I wonder if it is worth implementing another Notepad++ command line argument that specifies which command to run upon start. What do you guys think?
It might be gotten by name or menu and name and will be very useful for such batch invocations for any plugin or Npp command.
This will make the compare.exe launcher (or any other additional plugin launcher) unnecessary.
For example:notepad++.exe -nosession -multiInst file1 file2 .... --run=Compare:Compare
(Compare
Npp sub-menu,Compare
command)BR
-
@pnedev said:
Can somebody who has installed Notepad++ 7.6.6 try sending NPPM_GETNPPVERSION … and share what he/she gets from it?
Did it using the NppExec plugin. The result is 0x00070042 - i.e. hi-word 7 and lo-word 66, the expected result.
Since the problem is with Notepad v7.6.6 …
The problem also exists with Notepad++ v7.5.6, see my posting above.
I wonder if it is worth implementing another Notepad++ command line argument that specifies which command to run upon start.
Would be nice to have, but I think people who need such a feature have no problem to install and use a plugin for that. A plugin provides more flexibility than simply simulating a mouse-click on a menu entry.
-
Did it using the NppExec plugin. The result is 0x00070042 - i.e. hi-word 7 and lo-word 66, the expected result.
Thanks for testing that.
The problem also exists with Notepad++ v7.5.6, see my posting above.
OK, I must have missed that.
A plugin provides more flexibility than simply simulating a mouse-click on a menu entry.
I agree but for more simple use it would be easier if Notepad++ could “simulate a simple mouse-click” directly through the command line.
-
Hi, @joey79100, @meta-chuh, @ekopalypse, @dinkumoil, @pnedev, @dail and All,
Oh, stranger and stranger ! I found out something which seems off-topic but, eventually, allows the DOS program
compare.exe
to work nice ;-))- As you may know, I’m used to keep, numerous locale versions of Notepad++ for testing, on my laptop, in directories, like below :
D:\@@\692\...
,D:\@@\733\...
,D:\@@\742\...
,D:\@@\756\...
, and of course all versions from N++v.7.6.0
so the directoriesD:\@@\76x\...
-
And, generally, I don’t have the same plugins installed, in each configuration, as I installed a few for testing only !
-
Of course, for each tested version, I needed to install, first, the last
Compareplugin v2.0.0.0
and itscomparePlugin
directory :-
Along, with the others plugins, for tested N++ versions under
v7.6.0
-
In a new
Compareplugin
folder, for tested versions, fromv 7.6.0
and above
-
-
At the upper level, in the directory
D:\@@
, I placed the two filescompare.exe
andcompare.ini
, that I had previously extracted from the folderComparePlugin
of the archiveComparePlugin v1.5.6.6.bin.zip
-
In this same folder, I also placed two small working files
z1.txt
andz2.txt
, slightly different, to see the results when comparing
Remark :
As all my N++ installations are portable ones, so not locatable via registry, the
compare.ini
file must contain, for instance, the line :path=D:\@@\760\notepad++.exe
- Finally, in a DOS console window, I ran the command :
D:\@@\compare.exe z1.txt z2.txt
-
And I was very intrigued to see that this same DOS command worked with my version
7.6.0
and not with my version7.5.6
( of course, I changed the path line, accordingly, in thecompare.ini
file ! ). More precisely, I mean :-
With the
7.6.0
version, Notepad++ started withz1.txt
in the main view andz2.txt
in the secondary view and the compare process already done : the expected behavior :-)) -
With the
7.5.6
version, Notepad++ started with the two files, simply opened in the main view, without any compare process : the wrong behavior
-
-
Contrary to what you might think, this is not the consequence of the new way of installing plugins ! After one day of numerous tests ( Pfeeew ! ) I have come to the conclusion that if you include the
BetterMultiSelection
(v1.3.0.0
) plugin of Justin Dailey ( aka @dail ) , in your N++ configuration, it allows thecompare.exe
program, via the DOS commandD:\@@\compare.exe z1.txt z2.txt
, to get the right behavior ;-)) -
I cannot explain this fact and the logic of it ! I verified this assertion, with numerous versions of N++ and, of course, with any version above N++
v7.5.9
. During each test, I pressed theF1
key to make sure the expected Notepad++ version was used ! -
The tested versions of N++ were :
v6.8.1
,v6.8.8
,v6.9.2
,v7.2.0
,v7.3.3
,v7.4.2
,v7.5.6
,v7.5.8
,v7.6.0
,v7.6.1
,v7.6.2
,v7.6.3
,v7.6.4
,v7.6.6
,
However, be aware that some plugins break the right behavior of the
compare.exe
program ! Here is the ( non-exhaustive ) list of these plugins :AnalysePlugin.dll
,AutoCompletion.dll
,AutoEolFormat.dll
,AutoSaveU.dll
,Binhex.dll
,Ccc.dll
,Color_Picker.dll
,ColorPicker.dll
Up to now, after all my tests, it seems that everything is fine with all the plugins of the list, below :
CustomizeToolbar.dll CutNCopyLine.dll DB_RegExp.dll DSpellCheck.dll ElasticTabstops.dll Explorer.dll FileSwitcher.dll FingerText.dll GhNppExec.dll GmodLua.dll HexEditor.dll HTMLTag.dll IndentByFold.dll LanguageHelp.dll LightExplorer.dll LineFilter.dll LineFilter2.dll LocationNavigate.dll LuaScript.dll MarkdownViewerPlusPlus.dll ModelineParser.dll MultiClipboard.dll NativeLang.dll NavigateTo.dll NppAStyle.dll NppAutoIndent.dll NppCalc.dll NppColdFusion.dll NppColumnSort.dll Nppcrypt.dll NppExec.dll NppFTP.dll NppHasher.dll NppHorizontalRuler_Eng_0.1.5.dll NPPJSONViewer.dll NppMarkdown.dll NppMenuSearch_0.8.0.0.dll NppPlugin_ChangeMarker.dll Nppplugin_ofis2.dll NppPlugin_PluginMargin.dll NppPlugin_SciMarkerSymbol.dll nppplugin_solutionhub.dll nppplugin_solutionhub_ui.dll nppplugin_solutiontools.dll NppQCP.dll NppRegEx.dll NppSnippets.dll NppTaskList.dll NppTextFX.dll OpenFileInFolders.dll Pork2Sausage.dll PreviewHTML PythonScript.dll QuickText.dll RunMe.dll Scintillua++.dll SearchPlus.dll SecurePad.dll SelectNLaunch.dll SessionMgr.dll SourceCookifier.dll SpellChecker.dll SurroundSelection.dll Tidy2.dll Translate.dll VIsimulator.dll XBrackets.dll XmlNavigator.dll XMLTools.dll XPatherizerNPP.dll ZenCoding-Python.dll ZoomDisabler.dll
So, guys, could you test my assumption ? ( the fact of adding the
BetterMultiSelection
plugin is the key !? ) Many thanks for that !https://github.com/dail8859/BetterMultiSelection/releases
Best Regards,
guy038
P.S. :
May be, all this story is related with my Win XP SP3 laptop configuration ! Here is my debug info for the last
v7.6.6
N++ version :Notepad++ v7.6.6 (32-bit) Build time : Apr 3 2019 - 23:49:50 Path : D:\@@\766\notepad++.exe Admin mode : OFF Local Conf mode : ON OS : Windows XP (32-bit) Plugins : BetterMultiSelection.dll ComparePlugin.dll DSpellCheck.dll mimeTools.dll NppConverter.dll NppExport.dll
-
I would like to take credit for purposely enabling the functionality with the BetterMultiSelection plugin…but I haven’t the slightest idea to why it does. The only “odd” thing it might do is hook the keyboard, but my SurroundSelection works the same way. So not sure what the root cause is.
-
Hi, @Dail and All,
I also tested your other
SurroundSelection
plugin to verify if it could act as a catalyst ! Unfortunately, it cannot take on this role:-(On the other hand, even if your
BetterMultiSelection
is not enabled, it does not prevent the compare.exe program for acting just as expected ;-)) So, people may install it, without using it, if preferred !Tested on two configurations
v7.5.6
andv7.6.6
. Very very strange, indeed !!Cheers,
guy038
-
Indeed, some of the plugins you found preventing compare.exe from working correctly are installed at my testing environment with Notepad++ v7.6.6 (a VM ), e.g. AnalysePlugin, AutoEolFormat and ColorPicker.
But I don’t think that these plugins directly prevent compare.exe from doing its job nor do I believe that the BetterMultiSelection plugin is directly responsible for allowing compare.exe to work properly.
When compare.exe starts up Notepad++, it performs a (I would like to call it) “remote search” in the menu structure of Notepad++ to find the correct menu entry (menu Plugins\Compare\Compare) to simulate a mouse-click on. Unfortunately the Plugins menu gets build up dynamically by Notepad++ during its startup. The time needed for that process depends on the number of installed plugins and how many submenu entries they want to install.
That means compare.exe can not exactly know when the Plugins menu is completely built up. Instead it has to use guessing to try to get the right point of time to start its search. I think it waits for a certain time before searching or it tries to find the menu entry a certain number of times and gives up if it was not able to find it or it uses a combination of both methods. If I look to the debug output (see my posting above) I tend to say it uses at least the second approach.
For what ever reason the presence of the BetterMultiSelection plugin helps compare.exe (maybe only on your system!) to get the right point of time for starting its search (but I have no clue how this could work) and the presence of other plugins prevent it from that.
-
Hi @dinkumoil and All,
You said :
That means compare.exe can not exactly know when the Plugins menu is completely built up. Instead it has to use guessing to try to get the right point of time to start its search. I think it waits for a certain time before searching or it tries to find the menu entry a certain number of times and gives up if it was not able to find it or it uses a combination of both methods.
I do think that it’s the main point ! Thinking again about this matter, I realize that the list of the
8
plugins, that I gave in my previous post, and which prevents thecompare.exe
from working as expected, have a name with the first letter betweenA
andC
, only. And, as if by chance, theBetterMultiSelection
name begins with letterB
… …Not difficult to understand that, if any of these
8
plugins are not present, theBetterMultiSelection
plugin becomes, generally, the first plugin of the alphabetic list of the plugins, … and, a priori, right before theCompare
plugin ;-)) ;-)) This should mean a lot !?Best Regards,
guy038
-
Hi all,
The problem was in the code of the compare loader itself.
for (int i = 0; i < iMenuItems; i++)
{
...
GetMenuItemInfo(hPluginMenu, i, TRUE, &mii);
if (!lstrcmp(buffer, L"Compare"))
{
...
int iSubMenuItems = GetMenuItemCount(mii.hSubMenu);
for (int j = 0; j < iSubMenuItems; j++)
{
...
GetMenuItemInfo(mii.hSubMenu, i, TRUE, &smii);
The second
GetMenuItemInfo
should use the secondfor
cycle index:GetMenuItemInfo(mii.hSubMenu, j, TRUE, &smii);
BR