Looking for a freelancer to develop a plugin: Misspelled Word Counter

Miguel Lescano

@Ekopalypse Hi! I’ve been testing the script and I noticed, with this txt file, that the script reports 23 misspelled words (7 unique), but both DSpellCheck and a quick visual count tell me there are just 22 misspellings (6 unique). Maybe I’m doing something wrong? Could you please give this a look?

Here’s the TXT file. This time I zipped it so it does not lose the formatting:
https://www.spanishinput.com/uploads/1/1/9/0/11905267/lagrimas_de_acero_new.zip

And here’s the dictionary I’m using:
https://www.spanishinput.com/uploads/1/1/9/0/11905267/es-5000.zip

And here are my DSpellCheck settings. Thanks again for all your help!

Miguel Lescano

@Ekopalypse Hi! I found the problem. Words that start with a capital letter that has a diacritic are flagged as false positives. For example, Él.

Miguel Lescano

@Ekopalypse Me again…
I also discovered that, if I do not type a period, or a space, after a word, but instead press “Enter” or just do nothing and stop writing, that word is not taken into account at all. nothing after word.PNG

Miguel Lescano

Hi, @Ekopalypse… Just wanted to report that I’ve been testing what kinds of letters with diacritics trigger a false positive when they’re the first letter and a capital letter:

Accent marks (acute):
Árbol, Él

Tilde over the N:
Ñaño

The umlaut:
Über
(We do have the umlaut in Spanish, but I’ve never seen it at the start of a word, so I used a German word here)

Once again, thanks a lot for all the time you’ve devoted to this script!

Ekopalypse

@Miguel-Lescano

Good testing, I will check that as soon as I get home.

Ekopalypse

@Miguel-Lescano

I found the two issues.
First, a typo and second, a greeting from the past.

The typo is responsible for the behavior when no more characters are attached to a word.

editor.research('[[:alpha:]]+(?=[\h|[:punct:]|\R|\Z])', lambda m: words.append(m.group()))

must be

editor.research('[[:alpha:]]+(?=\h|[[:punct:]]|\R|\Z)', lambda m: words.append(m.group()))

The second problem has to do with the fact that Python2 and Python3 handle Unicode text differently.
Since I have been working only with Python3 for quite some time now I completely ignored the fact that for example ‘Ü’ is a bytes object in Python2 and a Unicode object in Python3.
This means that we have to work with Unicode in our code as well, so that functions like .lower() work.

from Npp import notepad, editor, NOTIFICATION, SCINTILLANOTIFICATION, STATUSBARSECTION, MODIFICATIONFLAGS
import os


class WORD_CHECKER:
    
    def __init__(self):
        print('__init__')
        self.report = ('Total: {0:<5}  '
                       'Unique: {1:<5}  '
                       'Total non-misspelled: {2:<5}({3:.1%})  '
                       'Total misspelled: {4:<4}({5:.1%})  '
                       'Unique misspelled: {6:<4}({7:.1%})')

        editor.callbackSync(self.on_modified, [SCINTILLANOTIFICATION.MODIFIED])
        notepad.callback(self.on_buffer_activated, [NOTIFICATION.BUFFERACTIVATED])
        current_dict_path = os.path.join(notepad.getPluginConfigDir(), 'Hunspell')
        current_dict_file = os.path.join(current_dict_path, 'ES-5000.dic')
        with open(current_dict_file, 'r') as f:
            self.current_dict = [word.decode('utf8')
                                 for word in f.read().splitlines()[1:]]   # skip length entry

        self.DEBUG_MODE = False
        self.on_buffer_activated({})  # must be last line here as it triggers check_words
        

    def check_words(self):
        words = []
        editor.research('[[:alpha:]]+(?=\h|[[:punct:]]|\R|\Z)',
                        lambda m: words.append(m.group().decode('utf8')))
        if self.DEBUG_MODE:
            print(u'words contains:\n  {}'.format('  '.join(words)))
            
        error_words = [word.lower() 
                       for word in words 
                       if word.lower() not in self.current_dict and    # insensitive word check
                       not word.isupper()  # ignore all uppercase only words
                       ]
        if self.DEBUG_MODE:
            print(u'error_words contains:\n  {}'.format('  '.join(error_words)))
            print(u'error_words unique contains:\n  {}'.format('  '.join(set(error_words))))
        
        total = len(words)
        unique = len(set(words))
        misspelled = len(error_words)
        misspelled_unique = len(set(error_words))
        notepad.setStatusBar(STATUSBARSECTION.DOCTYPE, 
                             self.report.format(total,
                                                unique,
                                                total-misspelled,  # non-misspelled
                                                (float(total-misspelled) / total) if misspelled else 1,  # non-misspelled %
                                                misspelled,
                                                (float(misspelled) / total) if misspelled else 0,
                                                misspelled_unique,
                                                (float(misspelled_unique) / total) if misspelled_unique else 0))


    def on_modified(self, args):
        if ((args['modificationType'] & MODIFICATIONFLAGS.INSERTTEXT) or 
            (args['modificationType'] & MODIFICATIONFLAGS.DELETETEXT)):
            self.check_words()


    def on_buffer_activated(self, args):
        self.check_words()


WORD_CHECKER()

The new code has an additional DEBUG_MODE, which, if set to True,
will print the content of words-, error_words- and unique error_words-list
to the python script console.

At the moment I am checking if it is possible or if it makes sense to read the DSpellCheck.ini to apply the settings automatically if necessary.
For example one might treat ALL Letters Capital as misspelled words.

Miguel Lescano

@Ekopalypse Thanks a lot! I can’t find the typo to save my life…
I’ve been using your script today to write the cues for my very first crossword puzzle for Spanish learners:
http://crossword.info/spanishinput/Spanish_Input_Level_1_Puzzle_001
All the cues use only words from the top 1000, except for proper names.

BTW, I have a couple of special request, so feel free to charge me for this. I know this is taking from your time, and I’m grateful for it:
Is there a way to add comment lines that are completely ignored from the calculation? I mean, not even counted in the word total. Maybe lines that start with // or with an asterisk or something like that.

Yes, I’ve been thinking about the All caps letters thing… Sometimes it does make sense to treat them the same as the other words. Still thinking…

Thanks a lot!

Bas de Reuver

@Ekopalypse said in Looking for a freelancer to develop a plugin: Misspelled Word Counter:

@Miguel-Lescano

Maybe you could convince predelnik to implement it!? My approach could serve as a template.
Maybe another tab called Statistics under Settings… with an option to display this in realtime in the DocType field!?

I agree with this, you could request a new feaure here:
https://github.com/Predelnik/DSpellCheck/issues

So like “feature request: count misspelled words” or “report/stats of misspelled words” or something like that, and refer to this forum thread.

Ekopalypse

@Miguel-Lescano said in Looking for a freelancer to develop a plugin: Misspelled Word Counter:

I’ve been using your script today to write the cues for my very first crossword puzzle for Spanish learners:

Cool :-)

BTW, I have a couple of special request, so feel free to charge me for this. I know this is taking from your time, and I’m grateful for it:

As long as I have time to do it and enjoy making it work, no problem.

Is there a way to add comment lines that are completely ignored from the calculation? I mean, not even counted in the word total. Maybe lines that start with // or with an asterisk or something like that.

Yes, this is possible, but that will mean that misspelled-word-synchronization with DSpellCheck isn’t working anymore, correct?

Miguel Lescano

@Ekopalypse Yes, this would kinda break things with DSpellCheck, but it’s not a problem.
I’d love to be able to add notes between Spanish dialogues. The notes would not be actually recorded for my students. I have a YouTube channel where I publish recordings of my stories:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XfpbG_5Im9Q

In the future, I plan to learn to use Unreal Engine to create short animations, so the notes would also include scene descriptions.

Ekopalypse

@Miguel-Lescano

The easiest way would be if the comment always starts at the
beginning of a line. But it can also be solved if the comment appears at
the end. What wouldn’t be so nice is if something like text comment text
is thought of or comment goes over several lines without the
new lines having a comment character at the beginning.

Assuming we use // as the “comment sign”

Relatively easy

// Comment
Text  // Comment

Not so easy:

// Comment
still comment //
Text

Text //comment
comment// Text

What do you think?

Miguel Lescano

@Ekopalypse Hi!
Yes, my plan is to have comment-only lines that could start with //, so the “relatively easy” option is what I’m looking for. I guess the line can be as long as I want it to be, right?

Ekopalypse

@Miguel-Lescano said in Looking for a freelancer to develop a plugin: Misspelled Word Counter:

I guess the line can be as long as I want it to be, right?

Theoretically yes, but there is a known problem with szintilla and the handling of “really” long lines but I do not assume that your comments
are longer than 1000 characters, right?

Ok, I give it a try.

Miguel Lescano

@Ekopalypse Yes, my comments would not be too long. Just explanations and descriptions.

Ekopalypse

@Miguel-Lescano

Sorry for the delay I got distracted by some other cool projects.
I opened a github page to release some of my scripts and I’d say
we use the issue tracker on github to avoid cluttering the forum here.

Miguel Lescano

@Ekopalypse Thanks! I’ll check it out.