How to remove middle text?

Mary Soifaite

@guy038 Thank you for letting me know about this. However, instead I studied this issue that I take the time to do things that other economic benefit of my family. Everyone is different circumstances. If you’re doing one work to care for family, whether you leave work every day then just to learn one topic does not help economic your family?
Please ignore problems that go, because it is not related to me, to you, and it is not related to the content of the forums about it. The problem here is that I need to know how to delete text at the bottom or at the top in my example stated:

email123@abc.com:12%&Myname:chatchat12&

And how to get this result ???

 email123@abc.com:12%&Myname

And this result ???

12%&Myname:chatchat12&

Mary Soifaite

This post is deleted!

Mary Soifaite

I’ve used this one, and it worked for me. But there are still residual marks behind: in each line. Is there another way?
Search :
([a-zA-Z0-9.%±]+@(?:[a-zA-Z0-9-]+.)+[a-zA-Z]{2,6}:(?:[a-zA-Z0-9.!@#$%^&*()-+/|]{5,})):\K.+
Replace with : Blank

PeterJones

@Mary-Soifaite ,

Since the new “@Mary-Soifaite” participant is at least showing a little bit of effort, showing regexes that were tried, I will chime in again.

if I had text that was split up in three groups, using colon : characters to separate the groups, and wanted to pick one or more of those groups, I would use a generic expression like

FIND = (?-is)^([^:]+):([^:]+):([^:]+)$

which puts the first term in $1, the second in $2, and the third in $3.

To make it clear, I will use the dummy text

one:two:three

as my example, though I know that any other characters than : can be in each section

For the replacement, depending on which words I wanted to keep, I would use

REPLACE =
- $1:$2
```
one:two
```
- $1:$3
```
one:three
```
- $2:$3
```
two:three
```

But whether your name is @Mary-Soifaite or @Sarah-Duong or @PeterJones or @guy038 , the way to learn how to do these things yourself, rather than asking every time and getting impatient when volunteers don’t answer you right away is to spend a few minutes reading the documentation. If it’s important enough to spend time writing up the question, and it’s important enough to spend time writing a response complaining that volunteers don’t reply within 10 minutes of asking the question, then it’s important enough to start learning to do on your own; and the way to do that is to learn from the examples that @Sarah-Duong has already been given in multiple discussions on this forum, and to read the documentation that has been linked in multiple conversations with @Sarah-Duong.

@Sarah-Duong: to get good answers

Show patience: Based on your native language, I am assuming you are in Asia; Guy is in Europe; I am on the West Coast of the United States. Local time is different for each of us. The person who may be best suited to answer your question may not be around during a time that is “convenient” for you. Some of us are here on our local weekends; some are here on our local weekdays; some are here just in our local evening; some come frequently; some come only occasionally. Waiting an hour or two, or a day or two, or even a week for an answer here are all perfectly-reasonable response times. If you complain about how long it’s been (“Where are you all going? This is too much.”), it is annoying to those of us who volunteer our time to help others in the forum. We are not paid for this. We all have other things – family, paying jobs, hobbies – in our lives that compete for our time.
Show an effort, show a willingness to learn: that includes making use of what we’ve shown you before, trying to slightly change things as circumstances change; ask questions about why something does or doesn’t work; don’t just tell us “and now, in this other circumstance, give me the answer”. Show what regex you tried: I appreciated that “@Mary-Soifaite” at least posted a regex that had been tried; she didn’t say why she thought it would work, and because she didn’t use backticks like `([a-zA-Z0-9.%+-]+@`, we cannot actually tell what her real regex looked like… but she at least showed something she tried: it shows an effort

If you feel me rude why are you still answering me

Because I want you to learn. The only reason I have hung out in this forum for the last four and a half years is because I like helping other people learn how to use this tool. And every once in a while, even in this discussion, you show that you might be willing to learn. You have spent a lot of time in this discussion arguing, and in this and other discussions, you tend to want us to just hand you the answer… but I haven’t given up, and I keep hoping that with the right phrasing, you’ll start asking better questions, and start learning from all the effort we have put into helping you.

guy038

Hi, @mary-soifaite, @sarah-duong @peterjones, @alan-kilborn and All

I think that we can generalize the @peterjones’s search regex to any number of fields, with a : separator

So, let’s suppose that each line of your table contains N + 1 fields, from 0 to N :

string_0:string_1:string_2: ....... :string_N

Then the generic regex, below, should work to get, after replacement, any group $i

SEARCH ^([^:\r\n]+):((?1)):((?1)): ...... :((?1))
-----------------------------------------
N times the regex :((?1))

So, @mary-soifaite, assuming your example :

email123@abc.com:12%&Myname:chatchat12&

the search regex ^([^:\r\n]+):((?1)):((?1)) and one the 3 replacements, proposed by Peter, should work just nice ;-))

Best Regards,

guy038

P.S. :

The pattern [^:\r\n] represents any standard character, different of a colon
So, the pattern [^:\r\n]+ stands for a non-mull range of this character
Now, the repeated pattern (?1) is a sub-routine call to group 1 ( [^:\r\n]+). So, a reference to the regex itself and not the present value of group 1 !
As each sub-routine call is surrounded by a couple a parentheses, each of them are referenced as group 2, group 3 , and so on … till group N

Mary Soifaite

Actually I do not know how to start. Here is my file, I copied one section to let people be able to understand and visualize the problem.

Mary Soifaite

I don’t post it here. It report error.

Mary Soifaite

alt text
and I need to get the results:

and results:

hope people understand my

guy038

Hello, @mary-soifaite,

Thanks for your different images. And, this confirms that, if we consider the general template :

STRING_1:STRING_2:STRING_3

You’re expecting two lists :

One with STRING_1:STRING_2, so, the first two fields
One with STRING_2:STRING_3, so, the last two fields

Thus,

The former list should be obtained with this regex S/R :
- SEARCH ^([^:\r\n]+):((?1)):((?1))
- REPLACE $1:$2
The later list should be obtained with this regex S/R :
- SEARCH ^([^:\r\n]+):((?1)):((?1)) ( idem as above)
- REPLACE $2:$3

Of course, you must select the Regular expression search mode, tick the Wrap around option and, finally click on the Replace All button !

Note that, instead of posting some images via an other site, you could have simply pasted the clipboard contents of your text, directly in your post area, by using the usual Ctrl + V shortcut : it’s easier for people to test regexes against your data

Even better : before pasting your text, click on the </> button, first, in order to insert code text !

Best regards,

guy038

Thomas 2020

it can also be so

^([^:\n]+)(:)((?1))
\1