Community
    • Login

    Find and remove everything else

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Help wanted · · · – – – · · ·
    17 Posts 4 Posters 2.9k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Alan KilbornA
      Alan Kilborn @Anthony Noriega
      last edited by Alan Kilborn

      @Anthony-Noriega

      So I’ll show it because you apparently can’t:

      /.*mykeyword*./

      :-)

      Please confirm that is correct.
      Can you make the adjustments to what I’ve already shown as an example, to make it work?
      It might be tricky…

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • Alan KilbornA
        Alan Kilborn @Anthony Noriega
        last edited by Alan Kilborn

        @Anthony-Noriega

        Well, it really is a bit tricky. :-)

        If we change my earlier text to this (which is more of what I think you have):

        After a weekend of emotional honesty at an Esalen-style retreat, Los Angeles
        sophisticates /.*Bob*./ and /.*Carol*./ Sanders (Robert Culp and Natalie Wood) return
        home determined to embrace complete openness. They share their enthusiasm
        and excitement over their new-found philosophy with their more conservative
        friends Ted and Alice Henderson (/.*Elliott*./ Gould and Dyan Cannon), who remain
        doubtful. Soon after, filmmaker Bob has an affair with a young production
        assistant on a film shoot in San Francisco. When he gets home he admits his
        liaison to Carol, describing the event as a purely physical act, not an
        emotional one. To Bob's surprise, Carol is completely accepting of his
        extramarital behavior. Later, Carol gleefully reveals the affair to /.*Ted*./ and
        /.*Alice*./ as they are leaving a dinner party. Disturbed by Bob's infidelity and
        Carol's candor, Alice becomes physically ill on the drive home. She and Ted
        have a difficult time coping with the news in bed that night. But as time
        passes they grow to accept that Bob and Carol really are fine with the
        affair. Later, Ted admits to Bob that he was tempted to have an affair once,
        but didn't go through with it; Bob tells Ted he should, rationalizing:
        "You've got the guilt anyway. /.*Don't waste it*./."
        

        If we then try this replacement:

        find: (?s).*?/\Q.*\E((?-s).*?)\Q*.\E/|(?s).*\z
        repl: ?1${1}\r\n
        (regular expression search mode)

        We’ll (again) obtain:

        Bob
        Carol
        Elliott
        Ted
        Alice
        Don't waste it
        

        I used the \Q and \E constructs to avoid leaning-toothpick-syndrome, somewhat.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
        • Anthony NoriegaA
          Anthony Noriega
          last edited by

          @Alan-Kilborn said in Find and remove everything else:

          ?1${1}\r\n

          Close, but the pattern you have is off…on the end, you hvae the star next to the keyword, and it should be the dot as my example.

          /.*mykeyword*./
          

          It should be:

          /.*mykeyword.*/
          
          Alan KilbornA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Terry RT
            Terry R
            last edited by Terry R

            @Anthony-Noriega said in Find and remove everything else:

            Close, but the pattern you have is off…on the end

            My solution was:
            Find What:(?s)\G/\.\*([^.]+)\.\*/|.+?(?=\z|/\.\*)
            Replace With:?1\1\r\n
            again a regular expression so search mode is regular expression.

            Where (again) leaning toothpicks are all around.

            Cheers
            Terry

            PS I should add there will likely be a last empty line, just a side effect of how the regex works. Should be easy enough to remove that afterwards.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
            • Anthony NoriegaA
              Anthony Noriega
              last edited by

              @Terry-R said in Find and remove everything else:

              (?s)\G/.*([^.]+).*/|.+?(?=\z|/.*)
              That fixed it, thank you all for your help.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • Alan KilbornA
                Alan Kilborn @Anthony Noriega
                last edited by Alan Kilborn

                @Anthony-Noriega said in Find and remove everything else:

                Close, but the pattern you have is off…

                Yes, my bad on that. :-(

                Too bad we couldn’t have seen this from the very beginning:
                Imgur

                Anthony NoriegaA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • Anthony NoriegaA
                  Anthony Noriega @Alan Kilborn
                  last edited by

                  @Alan-Kilborn Rookie mistake… i didnt realize the formatter was gonna make me look like a bonehead.

                  Alan KilbornA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                  • Alan KilbornA
                    Alan Kilborn @Anthony Noriega
                    last edited by Alan Kilborn

                    @Anthony-Noriega said in Find and remove everything else:

                    look like a bonehead.

                    No worries.
                    We see that kind of thing CONSTANTLY here!
                    :-)
                    The important part is we are marking your problem SOLVED!

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • guy038G
                      guy038
                      last edited by guy038

                      Hello, @Anthony-Noriega, @alan-kilborn, @terry-r and All,

                      I know, I’m a bit late :-) Here is my solution !

                      Assuming that the exact syntax is :

                      /.*keyword.*/
                      

                      SEARCH (?s).+?/\.\*(.+?)\.\*/|.+

                      REPLACE ?1\1\r\n

                      Notes :

                      • First, the (?s) syntax means that the regex . char will match any single character, even an EOL one

                      • Then , in two parts of the search expression, the regex syntax .+? represents the shortest non-null range of characters till, either, the strings /.* or .*/

                      • Because of the regex symbols * and ., these characters must be escaped with an slash, so the form \.\*

                      • As the second .+? syntax is embedded between parentheses, the second range of chars ( each keyword ) is stored as group 1

                      • Finally , then no more keyword exists, the second alternative .+ looks for the greatest non-null range of characters till… the very end of file

                      • In replacement, the conditional structure ?1\1\r\n means that if the group 1 exists, it is rewritten \1, followed with a line break \r\n. When the second alternative of the search occurs, no group is involved. So nothing occurs, and the last range of text, after the last keyword, is simply deleted

                      Best Regards,

                      guy038

                      Alan KilbornA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • Alan KilbornA
                        Alan Kilborn @guy038
                        last edited by

                        @guy038

                        But really, Guy, there isn’t anything new here over what you posted HERE – with the removal of the ^ as discussed a bit later in that thread – it’s just an application of the other posting’s idea to slightly different data.

                        We probably should stop solving the specific problems and just point people to the already-derived general solutions.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • guy038G
                          guy038
                          last edited by

                          Hi, @lan-kilborn,

                          Yes, I agree that it looks like a redundant piece of information ! In fact, I was thinking to this old post, where I proposed a general method, for isolating literal strings or expressions matched by a given regex, rewritten on different lines :

                          https://notepad-plus-plus.org/community/topic/12710/marked-text-manipulation/8

                          That’s the reason why, in my previous post, I preferred to focus on the regexes’s explanations, thinking it could be useful to the OP, anyway !

                          But, Alan, you’re right : my post wasn’t really needed ;-))

                          Cheers,

                          guy038

                          Alan KilbornA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                          • Alan KilbornA
                            Alan Kilborn @guy038
                            last edited by

                            @guy038

                            I had a further thought:

                            The thread I linked to earlier, and referred to in my post just above is entitled “Marked Text Manipulation”.

                            That relates to the current thread because a typical desire after marking some text is to copy only that text to another location, which is very similar to the topic of this “Find and remove everything else” thread.
                            In both cases you obtain the same effective result.

                            The new thought is that, at the time of the “Marked Text Manipulation” thread’s main discussion, there was no way to copy marked text without resorting to scripting. Now (7.9.1-ish) there is:

                            1f6bdae9-f91c-4b07-bfb6-5afebec8922b-image.png

                            Just press the indicated button after you already have marked some text.

                            I will put a similar not in that other thread as well.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                            • guy038G
                              guy038
                              last edited by

                              Hi, @anthony-noriega, @alan-kilborn, @terry-r and All,

                              Oh, yes, Alan. You’re right ! Of course, I already downloaded the portable v7.9.1 version but I’m still “stuck” with the v7.8.5 version which explains why I didn"t notice this recent enhancement !

                              So, thanks to @scott-sumner, we just have to use the (?-s)/\.\*\K(.+?)(?=\.\*/) regex, click on the Mark All button to get all the keywords and, then, click on the Copy Marked Text button and paste the results on a new document. Nice !

                              BR

                              guy038

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              The Community of users of the Notepad++ text editor.
                              Powered by NodeBB | Contributors