Replace tilde (~) with headword

glossar

Thank you so much, guy! I really appreciate your help!

I’ve quickly tested your regexes on another file, structurally very similar to the above-mentioned one. It seems you have done pretty decent job!

Two points though:

With the second regex, am I supposed to click on “Replace all” once? Out of curiosity, I have clicked the second time, it made more replacements - at the third it stopped, I also confirmed searching for a (remained) tilde, found in fact none.
Knowing what you can do with regex, I can’t believe you didn’t made the before- and after-tilde variations more flexible, limited them to only four cases, as you demonstrated above. On this another file, there are indeed many tildes which don’t follow your above patterns, namely no space before or after the tilde. After applied your regexes, I performed for the remained ones the following : ``
Find what: [backslash]~
Replace with: \s[backslash]~
Some are meant for example to be part of the headword (= endings, etc.):
After replacement, I got: Leistung en (Plural of the headword) (notice the space betwen the “g” and “en”.)

guy - Tilde can be part of nothing - neither of words, nor of tags, nor of codes, at least not on this file. So, you can’t possibly ruin anything with tilde-replacement. I mean, you could be more harsh on it. :)

If you could adjust the regexes accordingly, that would be perfect. Otherwise I’m already happy with the current ones, and once again, thank you so much for the effort.

Cheers,
glossar

Alan Kilborn

@glossar said in Replace tilde (~) with headword:

Knowing what you can do with regex, I can’t believe you didn’t made the before- and after-tilde variations more flexible, limited them to only four cases, as you demonstrated above. On this another file, there are indeed many tildes which don’t follow your above patterns, namely no space before or after the tilde.

So this isn’t a regex-writing service.
You are supposed to learn from the gracious help that has been thus far provided to you, and adapt the solutions provided to new and similar problems.

glossar

@Alan-Kilborn

Have I told or assumed that this is a regex-writing service? Let’s not speak English like that, shall we?

Alan Kilborn

@glossar said in Replace tilde (~) with headword:

Have I told or assumed that this is a regex-writing service?

It sure seems like you’re doing this.
And your tone seems a bit, well, demanding.

PeterJones

@glossar said in Replace tilde (~) with headword:

Have I told or assumed that this is a regex-writing service?

Your behavior, including the text that @Alan-Kilborn quoted, strongly suggested that you do effectively think of this as a regex writing service: otherwise, why ask for a new version of the regex when you had already admitted that the one already given to you worked?

Basically, the way that your final request came across was equivalent to “what you gave me worked… but, since you are writing regexes for me anyway, could you also change the regex to handle more edge cases for me or do something differently, without me having to try to modify the regex on my own.”.

If, instead, you had said something like: “Thanks for the regex, it works fine for the purposes described above. I was investigating whether I could change the regex to allow it to do the “tilde-replacement” I described earlier, and I tried modifying it to ....blah.... or ...something..., because I thought that the xxx portion of the regex would allow for the “tilde-replacement”; however, instead of getting what I expected, I got _____” (with actual regexes and sample data). If you had put in the effort to try to change it yourself, explained why you thought your changes would work, and explained how their results didn’t match your expectations, then at least you would have shown that you were trying to learn and apply what we’d already taught you, rather than requesting yet again to “write the regex for me”.

The best way to stay in the good-graces of the regulars here who are helping you with regexes is to show that you are trying to learn and apply the examples already given, and branching off on your own. The best way to frustrate the regulars here who are trying to help is to keep on changing the requirements and asking for changes to the free regexes you’ve already been given, without even trying to make the changes yourself.

guy038

Hello, glossar, @terry-r, @alan-kilborn and All,

With the first regex S/R provided in previous post, we’re able to insert the current headword, at the end of each card section, to refer to when further match of the \~ string, located after a space char. OK !

So, now, let’s start with the regex \x20\\~ which matches a space character followed by the \ symbol and a ~ character and which must be replaced, somehow, with the current headword !

Assuming this example, from the Absicht entry :

\~, etw zu tun[/c] with a view to \[[i]or[/i] the intention of] doing sth; [c teal]er verfolgte sie in der

@glossar, Which kind of output do you expect to ?

(A) \Absicht, etw zu tun[/c] with......, where everything after ~, till next word char, is just rewritten, as it is
(B) \Absicht etw zu tun[/c] with......, where everything after ~, till next word char, is replaced with a single space char
(C) \Absicht: etw zu tun[/c] with......, where everything after ~, till next word char, is replaced with : and a single space char
(D) \Absicht; etw zu tun[/c] with......, where everything after ~, till next word char, is replaced with ; and a single space char
(E) \Absicht. etw zu tun[/c] with......, where everything after ~, till next word char, is replaced with . and a single space char
(F) \Absicht> etw zu tun[/c] with......, where everything after ~, till next word char, is replaced with > and a single space char
(G) \Absichtetw zu tun[/c] with......, where everything after ~, till next word char, is simply deleted

Do you prefer to delete, in replacement, the \ backslash, located before the ~, like below ?

(H) Absicht, etw zu tun[/c] with......,
(I) Absicht etw zu tun[/c] with......,
(J) Absicht: etw zu tun[/c] with......,
(K) Absicht; etw zu tun[/c] with......,
(L) Absicht. etw zu tun[/c] with......,
(M) Absicht> etw zu tun[/c] with......,
(N) Absichtetw zu tun[/c] with......,

Do you need an extra space char, between the headword and the symbol, as below :

(O) Absicht , etw zu tun[/c] with......,
(P) Absicht : etw zu tun[/c] with......,
(Q) Absicht ; etw zu tun[/c] with......,
(R) Absicht . etw zu tun[/c] with......,
(S) Absicht > etw zu tun[/c] with......,

or anything else ?

Once you’ve decided of the right syntax which must be matched, in search and rewriten, in replacement, it should be easy to get the right second S/R needed ;-))

BR

guy038

glossar

@Alan-Kilborn @PeterJones

I’m sorry if my tone seemed to you demanding. When I write something here, just like I’m doing right now, I’m more focused on, struggling with what I would like to express - be it a question, asking favour, or something else. Since English is not my mother language, please don’t assume that I have full control over English because I don’t.

But you are aware that you have the option to simply ignore my requests here, right? - like hundreads, if not thousands, of registered users do, except, well a few. You might want to make more of that option. :)

Finally, a word on this “famous” learning - would you attempt to learn the language of your foreign crush just to send a few SMS to her once in a blue moon? I mean learning a foreign language for the sake of sending a few messages? My post history is accessible, the amount and frequency of my requests are fair, if not low and rare, I believe.

Cheers,
glossar

PeterJones

@glossar ,

We choose not to ignore because we want you to learn. How rude of us.

As an analogy, I cannot draw very well. If I asked a friend of mine who was good at drawing to make a sketch of a landscape for me, he’d probably do it out of friendship. If I took a look at it and said, “that looks nice, but could you move the mountain from the left to the right, and add a barn over here?”, And then he obliges. And then I say, “let’s add a tree over there, and a road going from the barn off the picture to the right”, he would not be out of line to suggest that I should start practicing drawing myself, because he is not my free sketch-generating service. I might whine back, “but it’s hard to learn how to sketch well”; he could then reply, “that’s true; but it’s worth it in the end, if you get your sketches without waiting for me”

Whether you are willing to make the effort of learning a language to text your girlfriend, or learn how to sketch your landscapes yourself, or learn how to craft your own regexes is up to you. But don’t be surprised if your girlfriend leaves you, your artist friend stops sketching for you, or the regex experts in this forum get tired of doing your work for you.

Good luck with your future endeavors.

glossar

@guy038

Thank you for the effort, I appreciate it!

If I shouldn’t sound demanding :D, I would say I would expect all and none of them. There are thousands of entries in the file, with possibly ten thousands of tildes - I can’t go through all of them visually and manually, hence I can’t know or predict what stays before and after (each) tilde(s). As I said, you can’t ruin anything since they are not part of anything in the file. The regex should therefore replace a tilde with the headword exactly there, where it finds it - if there are zero or one or multiple spaces, letters, chars or whatever before or after a tilde, let it be, it should be replaced regardless.

Cheers,
glosaa

guy038

Hi, @glossar, @terry-r, @alan-kilborn, @peterjones and All,

Thanks for your reply. So the second regex S/R should simply replace :

A tilde character, in the expression space character + backslash character ( \ ) + tilde character ( ~ )

with :

The headword of the current card section, only, without any additional char, either before or after

Note, @glossar, that this formulation means this kind of replacement :

...nicht meine \Absicht![/c] it was an accident!, I didn't mean to do it!; [c teal]es war schon immer seine
...immer seine \Absicht, reich zu werden[/c] it has always been his goal to be rich; [c teal]das lag nicht in meiner
...in meiner \Absicht[/c] that was definitely not what I intended; [c teal]mit den besten
...den besten \Absichten[/c] with the best of intentions; [c teal]ernste
...[c teal]ernste \Absichten haben[/c] to have honourable \[[i]or[/i] [c sienna]AM[/c] -orable] intentions; [c teal]verborgene
...[c teal]verborgene \Absichten[/c] hidden intentions; [c teal]die
...[c teal]die \Absicht haben, etw zu tun[/c] to have the intention of doing sth; [c teal]in selbstmörderischer
...elbstmörderischer \Absicht[/c] with the intention of killing herself/himself; [c teal]\~ sein[/c] to be intentional; [c teal]in der
...in der \Absicht, etw zu tun[/c] with a view to \[[i]or[/i] the intention of] doing sth; [c teal]er verfolgte sie in der
...in der \Absicht, sie zu berauben[/c] he followed her with intent to rob her; [c teal]eine
...[c teal]eine \Absicht verfolgen[/c] to pursue a goal; [c teal]mit/ohne
...mit/ohne \Absicht[/c] intentionally/unintentionally[/m]

...[c teal]ein \Kaminfeuer machen[/c] to light the fireplace[/m]

where the headword Absicht will be inserted with these different syntaxes :

Absicht verfolgen[/c] to
Absicht![/c] it was an
Absicht, etw zu tun[/c]
Absicht[/c] intentionally
Absichten haben[/c] to have
Absichten[/c] hidden intentions;

If you agree, to this general format, which, BTW, simplifies the second regex, here is a summary of the final solution :

This first regex S/R, as said before :
- SEARCH (?s)^(\w+).+?\K(?=^\w+|(\Z))
- REPLACE (?2\r\n)\1\r\n

Adds each headword at the end of each card section

Then, this second regex S/R :
- SEACRH (?s)\x20\\\K~(?=.+?^(\w+))|^\w+\R(?=\w+|\Z)
- REPLACE ?1\1

Replaces any tilde character, in the expression “space char + the \~” string, with the current headword

Deletes any headword, temporarily inserted at the end of each card section

IMPORTANT : for these two S/R :

You must tick the Wrap around option
You MUST use the Replace All button, ONLY ( Do not use the Replace button at all ! ). This is because of the \K syntax in the regexes

Best Regards,

guy038

glossar

@guy038

Hi guy,

Thank you so much! I stand corrected. Having struggled with expressing anything of any number before and after the tilde, I have forgotten to add the exception of backslash - my bad! All other synaxes are fine. I have just thrown a glance at the file on which I applied your previous regexes rev. #2 (namely the second pair, the one just before the last one - for the sake of clarity), and realized that it has also put (or kept) backslashes before the headword, so does this last one as well. But I could live with it because this time a backslash can’t be a part of a word or a group of words outside the file (code, whatever), I can’t possibly ruin anything by deletin it where it is, so I can simply S/R for it and get rid of it.

Thanks a million for your patience and your help!

Greetings,
glossar

guy038

Hi, @glossar,

Ah… OK ! If you want to get rid of the \ character, as well, just use this modified version of the second regex :

SEARCH (?s)\x20\K\\~(?=.+?^(\w+))|^\w+\R(?=\w+|\Z)
REPLACE ?1\1

BR

guy038

glossar

@guy038

Hi guy!

Thank you for effort.

FYI, I’ve applied this last one as well as the second one on another file. Sadly, both didn’t work well, leaving 10K-20K tildes behind.

Greetings,
glossar