Community
    • Login

    Notepad++ v8.5.3 Release

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Announcements
    48 Posts 22 Posters 15.5k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • donhoD
      donho @Jerald Belleza
      last edited by

      @Jerald-Belleza
      May I know from which version you have updated to v8.5.3?

      Jerald BellezaJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • donhoD
        donho @guy038
        last edited by

        @guy038 @Alan-Kilborn

        I can see the “inconsistency” of carriage return in saved shortcuts.xml.
        However, after replaying the recorded macro, I see no unexpected behaviour. So it’s not a bug to me, or am I missing somethings?

        If I am, please provide me here a small (as small as possible) scenario to reproduce the bug. Thank you in advance.

        PeterJonesP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • guy038G
          guy038
          last edited by guy038

          Hello, @don-ho,

          I agree with you, that whatever the EOL of the current file, the macro is always fully functional !

          It’s the case when :

          • You use my Test_CRLF macro with a Windows (CRLF) EOL file

          • You use my Test_LF macro with a Unix (LF) EOL file

          • You use my Test_CR macro with a Mac (CR) EOL file


          However, I would have expected :

          • For a current Windows (CRLF) file, the following recording of the line-breaks, in the shortcuts.xml file, with a CR and LF lines ( instead of CR then CRLF ) :
                      <Action type="1" message="2170" wParam="0" lParam="0" sParam="
          " />
                      <Action type="1" message="2170" wParam="0" lParam="0" sParam="
          " />
          
          • And for a current Unix (LF) file, the following recording of the line-breaks, in the shortcuts.xml file, with two consecutive LF lines ( instead of two CRLF lines ) :
                      <Action type="1" message="2170" wParam="0" lParam="0" sParam="
          " />
                      <Action type="1" message="2170" wParam="0" lParam="0" sParam="
          " />
          

          BR

          guy038

          P.S. :

          • For a Mac (CR) file, it’ seems OK, as we do have two consecutive CR lines, if current line-endiing is Mac (CR) !

          P.P.S. :

          • This means that it would be necessary to take in account the current line-ending of the current file, while recording these line-breaks / a macro !
          donhoD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • PeterJonesP
            PeterJones @donho
            last edited by PeterJones

            @donho said in Notepad++ v8.5.3 Release:

            So it’s not a bug to me

            Is the exact situation they showed technically a bug? No, because “it works”: it plays back what was recorded.

            But since we’re requiring users to hand-edit their macros to get rid of entities, it should at least be done in a readable way, and a way that the user can easily understand. And it doesn’t meant that it isn’t pointing to a bug in the implementation.

            For example, a user is hand editing their macro, and they know from Scintilla.iface that 2170 is “ReplaceSel” which maps to SCI_REPLACESEL, and they know from the Scintilla documentation that SCI_REPLACESEL allows any string, not just a string containing a single character. So then while hand-editing, they put in “A new line.[CR][LF]A second line.[CR][LF]” and save their macro file, and restart.
            0c154987-7995-4f6b-ad10-b8b0641c6364-image.png
            They now run this macro, and the macro inserts a single [LF], not the [CR][LF] that they intended.

            d913c5bd-c70f-4414-a1e5-f148d07b52cd-image.png

            If there’s a [CR][LF] in the string that the macro is supposed to insert in the source for the macro, it needs to be inserted into the document as a [CR][LF]. This is a bug, IMO, because the user hand-edited a macro to put in [CR][LF], and the string that they inserted in that command is not the string that gets inserted into their document.

            alexologA TragenT 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 3
            • alexologA
              alexolog @PeterJones
              last edited by

              @PeterJones said in Notepad++ v8.5.3 Release:

              For example, a user is hand editing their macro, and they know from Scintilla.iface that 2170 is “ReplaceSel” which maps to SCI_REPLACESEL, and they know from the Scintilla documentation that SCI_REPLACESEL allows any string, not just a string containing a single character.

              I would expect NP++ to include the relevant documentation instead of expecting the (possibly novice) user to start hunting for it. Especially given that the user’s version NP++ may be older than the documentation available online.

              Including a snapshot of the relevant documentation with the distribution should be doable.

              Alan KilbornA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • Alan KilbornA
                Alan Kilborn @alexolog
                last edited by

                @alexolog

                Everything you said has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with the relevant points being made in this thread, and probably just obfuscates the main thrust of those points. :-(

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • donhoD
                  donho @guy038
                  last edited by donho

                  @guy038 @PeterJones

                  I see your point.
                  There’ll be no harm to create a bug for this issue.
                  I have just no idea how to fix it (for not having the regression).

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • usmcguyU
                    usmcguy @donho
                    last edited by

                    @donho

                    “SYSPRP Package NotepadPlusPlus_1.0.0.0_neutral__7njy0v32s6xk6 was installed for a user, but not provisioned for all users. This package will not function properly in the sysprep image.”

                    Getting this error when trying to SysPrep on Windows 11. Noticed someone posted in the 8.5.2 Release had the same problem.

                    PeterJonesP Pete GomersallP 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • PeterJonesP
                      PeterJones @usmcguy
                      last edited by

                      @usmcguy said in Notepad++ v8.5.3 Release:

                      Getting this error when trying to SysPrep on Windows 11. Noticed someone posted in the 8.5.2 Release had the same problem.

                      Did you follow the link in that discussion to the nppShell issue#29? From looking at the beginning and end of that issue, it looks like the fix for that problem is still “in progress”. It might be beneficial for you to study that discussion, looking for insights that the contributors have that might help you in the short term, or at least give you more clarity as to what’s going on, and looking for things that haven’t been said yet that you could add that might help a fix be implemented.

                      usmcguyU 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • usmcguyU
                        usmcguy @PeterJones
                        last edited by

                        @PeterJones The Link I see (http://download.notepad-plus-plus.org/repository/MISC/nppShell.TEST20/) doesn’t load. Is this the link you were referring to?

                        PeterJonesP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • PeterJonesP
                          PeterJones @usmcguy
                          last edited by

                          @usmcguy said in Notepad++ v8.5.3 Release:

                          @PeterJones The Link I see (http://download.notepad-plus-plus.org/repository/MISC/nppShell.TEST20/) doesn’t load. Is this the link you were referring to?

                          No. I was referring to the link https://github.com/notepad-plus-plus/nppShell/issues/29 , which was the link I embedded in my most recent post.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • Pete GomersallP
                            Pete Gomersall @usmcguy
                            last edited by

                            @usmcguy
                            Just checking if you are running get-appxpackage | remove-appxpackage before running sysprep? I build monthly updates of Windows 10 and 11 and run above command before I run sysprep to create them; did not have an issue with last month’s build that had 8.5.2.

                            usmcguyU 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • usmcguyU
                              usmcguy @Pete Gomersall
                              last edited by

                              @Pete-Gomersall I did end up using the cmdlet to remove the AppX package before Sysprep.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • Cameron GrayC
                                Cameron Gray @Jerald Belleza
                                last edited by

                                @Jerald-Belleza I noticed this as well (I don’t recall what my previous version I had prior to the upgraded to the v8.5.3 version, but I always keep it updated so it must have been fine in the prior version).

                                My instance settings are set to “Always multi-instance mode”, but in earlier versions, when selecting multiple files in file explorer and “Edit with Notepad++” context menu option, it would place it in the same new instance not 1 instance per file! I learned this the hard way when I had over 2-dozen files selected! This is quite annoying now because I rely on that functionality and don’t want to have my instance setting to the default “mono instance”.

                                My OS is Win10 Pro, 22H2 19045.3031

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • Mark OlsonM
                                  Mark Olson
                                  last edited by

                                  If anyone else is mildly (or severely!) dissatisfied with the fact that non-printing characters and control characters no longer show up by default, here is an issue that I introduced
                                  and here is the script that I created to show non-printing and control characters but not CR and LF:

                                  from Npp import *
                                  
                                  notepad.menuCommand(44130) # toggle all non-printing characters
                                  notepad.menuCommand(44131) # toggle all control characters (e.g., BEL, ENQ)
                                  
                                  Alan KilbornA supasillyassS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                  • Alan KilbornA
                                    Alan Kilborn @Mark Olson
                                    last edited by

                                    @Mark-Olson said in Notepad++ v8.5.3 Release:

                                    non-printing characters and control characters no longer show up by default

                                    I haven’t looked at your issue, but defaults for these settings in 8.5.3 are:

                                    • Show Non-Printing Characters (checkmarked)
                                    • Show Control Characters & Unicode EOL (checkmarked)
                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                    • guy038G
                                      guy038
                                      last edited by guy038

                                      There’s something that I don’t like regarding the new behaviour of the Show Symbol feature !


                                      To explain my annoyance, follow these simple steps :

                                      • First, ensure that NO line is checked when selecting the View > Show Symbol menu

                                      • In a new UTF-8 tab, add the following line, which ends with a line-break

                                      abc    def	ghi jklmno
pqr
                                      

                                      This line contains the string abc, then four Space chars, the string def, a Tab char, the string ghi, the Narrow Non Breaking Space char, the string jkl, the ETX char, the string mno, the LS char, the string pqr and ends with the usual \r\n line-break

                                      Note that, as no Show Symbol option is set, at this time, the 3 chars between the strings jkl, mno and pqr cannot be seen in N++ and the Spaces and Tabs are only visible as blank chars ( Logical )


                                      Now, successively, click on :

                                      • The View > Show Symbol > Show Space and Tab option

                                      => The Space characters between abc and def, as well as the tab character between def and ghi should be seen

                                      • The View > Show Symbol > Show End of Line option

                                      => The \r\n ( or \n ) characters should be seen

                                      • The View > Show Symbol > Show Non-Printing Characters option

                                      => The Narrow Non Breaking Space character should be seen

                                      • The View > Show Symbol > Show Control Characters & Unicode EOL option

                                      => The two characters ETX and LS should be seen

                                      So far, everything seems logical !

                                      However, you’ll note that the Show All Characters option was automatically checked, when we previously check the Show Control Characters & Unicode EOL option


                                      Now, click a first time on the ¶ button ( standing for the Show All Characters option ) of the Tools bar => No visible change as all the options of the Show Symbol menu are checked ( Normal )

                                      Then, click a second time on the ¶ button => At once, all the symbols disappeared ! Of course, it has always been the behaviour of this option. However, regarding all the new options added to the Show Symbol menu, I was expecting that :

                                      • The View > Show Symbol > Show Space and Tab option would be still checked

                                      • The View > Show Symbol > Show Non-Printing Characters option would be still checked

                                      • The View > Show Symbol > Show Control Characters & Unicode EOL option would be sill checked

                                      Presently, after this second click on the ¶ button, we, unfortunately, have to redo all the process to be able to see most of these special characters, again !


                                      What is your feelings regarding my proposition ? So, in other words :

                                      • The ¶ button would check the Show All Characters option, if presently not checked

                                      • The ¶ button would uncheck the Show End of Line option only, if presently checked

                                      Best Regards,

                                      guy038

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                      • datatraveller1D
                                        datatraveller1
                                        last edited by

                                        @guy038 It seems I commented nearly the same here: https://github.com/notepad-plus-plus/notepad-plus-plus/issues/13734#issuecomment-1575470110

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                        • TragenT
                                          Tragen @PeterJones
                                          last edited by

                                          @PeterJones

                                          I had the problem that the XML parsers from Microsoft ignoring CRLF in Text and always returning only LF. I don’t know if that’s in the spec but this is what happens if you read the XML.
                                          So you will never get the real CRLF until you encode it somehow or use CDATA sections.

                                          PeterJonesP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • PeterJonesP
                                            PeterJones @Tragen
                                            last edited by

                                            @Tragen said in Notepad++ v8.5.3 Release:

                                            @PeterJones

                                            I had the problem that the XML parsers from Microsoft ignoring CRLF in Text and always returning only LF. I don’t know if that’s in the spec but this is what happens if you read the XML.
                                            So you will never get the real CRLF until you encode it somehow or use CDATA sections.

                                            And the workaround that works for v8.5.3 is in the FAQ

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            The Community of users of the Notepad++ text editor.
                                            Powered by NodeBB | Contributors