Search Just Within Provided Line Number

Terry R

@Scott-Daniels said in Search Just Within Provided Line Number:

Is this possible?

Certainly is. To work you need to use the “Find in Files” function, have the search mode set to Regular Expression and the following red text in the Find What field:(?-s)^(.*\R){3}\K(.*2.*\R)

You would then fill in the remaining fields as necessary to locate the folder containing the files and any other filtering necessary to only test the files you want within that folder (say you have TXT and BIN files), you would use *.TXT in the filters field.

Click on the Find All, and the search panel will appear with the results of which files meet that criteria.

Have a go, and if issues come back with more questions.

Terry

Coises

@Scott-Daniels said in Search Just Within Provided Line Number:

I need to be search line number 4 for the number 2. I need to perform this search on a directory of text files. Is this possible?

Search | Find in Files… from the main menu; then enter:

Find what: \A([^\r\n]*+\R){3}[^\r\n]*\K2
Search Mode: Regular expression
Filters: *.* or *.txt
Directory: set as appropriate using … button

and click Find All.

Edit to add: Rereading, I see that you said “the number 2” and not “the digit 2.” If you meant that you specifically need to find 2 but not 20 or 12, then change the expression to:

Find what: \A([^\r\n]*+\R){3}[^\r\n]*\K(?<!\d)2(?!\d)

guy038

Hello, @scott-daniels, @terry-r, @coises and All,

@scott-daniels, I realize that other people have already beaten me to it !!

Here is how I understand your question :

For each text file in a specific folder :
- Don(t care about the first three lines of each file
- And looks for, at least, one occurrence of the string 2 in the fourth line of each file

Am I right regarding this assumption ?

In case of a positive answer, here is my solution, similar to their ones :

Open the Find in Files dialog ( Ctrl + Shift + F )
Untick all box options
Fill in the string (?-s)\A(.*\R){3}.*?\K2 in the Find what: zone
Leave the Replace with: zone Empty
Enter *.txt in the Filters : zone
Enter full pathname of your directory name in the Directory : zone
Select the Regular expression search mode
Click once on the Find All button
Wait till the Search results window is displayed !

Best regards

guy038

Alan Kilborn

I think @Coises 's answer is best here:

Terry didn’t use \A to keep the search anchored to the start of file
Guy did too much (OP didn’t mention deleting the matching text, only finding it)
Coises gets bonus points for using the possessive form

Terry R

@Alan-Kilborn said in Search Just Within Provided Line Number:

Terry didn’t use \A to keep the search anchored to the start of file

Unless I’m mistaken, doesn’t each Find in Files search always start at the beginning, thus making the \A redundant. Of course keeping it in just means being consistent with regex making, but since it’s used very in-often we hardly ever see it in regexes even for opened documents.

Terry

Alan Kilborn

@Terry-R said in Search Just Within Provided Line Number:

doesn’t each Find in Files search always start at the beginning

Yes, but nothing prevents your regex from starting a match later in the file (if one/more happens to exist). The \A will do this.

Of course, since OP is apparently just visually inspecting results, he could ignore any matches that aren’t near the top-of-file.

Terry R

@Alan-Kilborn said in Search Just Within Provided Line Number:

Yes, but nothing prevents your regex from starting a match later in the file (if one/more happens to exist).

Isn’t that a contradiction?

First you agree that each search in “Find in Files” commences at the start of a file. Then you suggest somehow a regex can “slip” to another possible occurrence. I don’t see how. Even if the search is repeated it will still find the same occurrence as the previous search.

Terry

PS maybe if there is some further debate we should start a new thread rather than cloud the OP’s judgement on other things.

PeterJones

@Terry-R ,

As with all regex, if it doesn’t match at the start of the search, it keeps going to the end, checking if each position matches. Your regex will match the file below, even though the fourth line doesn’t have a 2 in it anywhere – lines 2-5 fit the pattern you defined.

one
two
three
four
five has 2
six

@Alan-Kilborn ,

I am not sure @Coises is right, either, because his assumes the fourth line starts with a 2, whereas the phrasing of the OP implies it might be anywhere on line 4. (And @guy038 replicated that understanding.)

(?-s)\A(.*\R){3}\K(.*2.*) is my suggestion – I also removed the trailing \R, otherwise a 4-line file missing final newline wouldn’t be found.

Alan Kilborn

@PeterJones said in Search Just Within Provided Line Number:

I am not sure @Coises is right, either, because his assumes the fourth line starts with a 2

Coises uses [^\r\n]*\K2 which would start trying to match at the beginning of line 4 (from the earlier stuff in his regex). It appears to read (starting there) as "match any non-line-ending chars zero-or-more times followed by a 2 – seems to fit the bill. I’m away from my PC right now, so I can’t try it, though.

PeterJones

@Alan-Kilborn ,

Oh, you’re right… I missed the [^\r\n]* when I was reading it (and didn’t try his before my post).

So yes, I just confirmed @Coises’ suggestion works on my test data, too.

Terry R

@PeterJones said in Search Just Within Provided Line Number:

Your regex will match the file below, even though the fourth line doesn’t have a 2 in it anywhere – lines 2-5 fit the pattern you defined.

Thanks, I now stand corrected. Somehow with my meagre testing on a small file I neglected to include another occurrence further down the file. Of course that shouldn’t have affected my decision as I knew the regex completes as many iterations as necessary to include the “whole file”, but there was a snafu in my solution. Yes using the \A is necessary to JUST look at the nth line ONLY.

Thanks
Terry

PS @Alan-Kilborn I DID read your info, but somehow that didn’t allow me to make the connection and Peter’s example is what it took to get me over the line. I guess today just isn’t my day, there’s always tomorrow!

guy038

Hello, @scott-daniels, @terry-r, @coises @alan-kilborn, @peterjones and All,

@alan-kilborn, you said :

Guy did too much (OP didn’t mention deleting the matching text, only finding it)

I don’t understand because, in my post, I do NOT speak about deleting the 2 digit, at any moment ?

Now, about the @coises syntax \A([^\r\n]*+\R){3}[^\r\n]*\K2, with an atomic ( possessive ) syntax, I don’t see the bonus to use it !

Indeed, it necessarily needs to get some EOL chars after the possible standard chars [\r\n]*. Thus, it will grasp all standard chars, even zero, followed with EOL char(s), in all cases !

And note that I use the (?-s) modifier which means that the . regex char is identical to [^\r\n\f], anyway !

But, I must admit that the second @coises’s solution is more accurate, if the OP needs to get the number 2, only

Thus, we end up, with this search regex :

(?-s)\A(?:.*\R){3}.*?\K(?<!\d)2(?!\d)

Best Regards,

guy038

Alan Kilborn

@guy038 said in Search Just Within Provided Line Number:

I don’t understand because, in my post, I do NOT speak about deleting the 2 digit, at any moment ?

Ah…you’re right. I supposed I was confused because when you said:

Leave the Replace with: zone Empty

It appeared to me like this was setting up a replace-with-nothing aka delete operation!