How to debug plugins during development?
moon6969 last edited by moon6969
I’m trying to get source level debugging working in VS2017 and the current C# demo plugin templates from kbilsted/NotepadPlusPlusPluginPack.Net.
It builds and runs fine (Debug/x86), and in VS I can attach to a running instance of notepad++ and hit breakspoints etc. Marvellous!
However I just can’t figure out how to get the debugger to work when I try and launch in the VS IDE with F5.
I’ve pointed VS to the exact same notepad++.exe, and it launches fine on F5, but the breakpoints just dont fire.
In VS the breakpoints display as a hollow circle (instead of solid red dot) and reads
“The breakpoint will not currently be hit. No executable code of the debugger’s target code is associated with this line.
Possible causes include: conditional compilation, compiler optimisations, or the target architecture of this line is not supported by the current debugger code type.”
If I look at “modules” screen in VS I can see the pdb is found just fine, but there are two copies of the demo.dll loaded.
I notice the 2nd one has “The module did not load at the default load address.”
Both lines show the same debug symbols (C:\6\Dev\npp.7.4.2.bin\plugins\Demo.pdb) and are connected to the same npp PID (running from C:\6\Dev\npp.7.4.2.bin\notepad++.exe).
If I then “Stop Debugging” in VS and instead launch C:\6\Dev\npp.7.4.2.bin\notepad++.exe directly from Explorer, I can simply attach VS and debug successfully. In this case modules view shows only a single demo.dll…
I’ve been experimenting all day to try and get it working - cleaning, deleting obj, various arcane settings, a fresh copy of the demo source.
Claudia Frank last edited by Claudia Frank
It’s been a while since I used dotnet languages but as far as I remember there
is a default settings which prevents dependencies from building at compile time.
Means only the startup project gets compiled but dependencies are build at runtime.
Could this be your issue as well?
moon6969 last edited by
I did some more experiments with the “Only build startup projects and dependencies on Run” setting, but it had no effect. I believe this setting is only relevant in bigger solutions… in my test case there are no dependencies and only one project!
To get some perspective I downloaded a more up to date C# plugin: phdesign/NppToolBucket (nice work thanks Paul!)
The provided .sln file worked flawlessly on VS2017 without modifcation (other than pointing it to my test notepad++ instance).
So I compared in detail NotepadPlusPlusPluginPack.Net and NppToolBucket and came to the conclusion my issue is probably in the DllExport section and possibly related to using VS2017 rather than VS2015.
My head hurts now, so I am just going to run with NppToolBucket as my learning base!
moon6969 last edited by
I got the same issue with a new plugin after changing my NPP source to v7.5.6.
It seems to be caused by the C# plugin being targeted to “Any CPU” in the configuration manager - even though the C# project properties showed “Platform: Active (x86)”, the “Platform target” was “Any CPU”.
To change it I had to open the configuration manager and create a new x86 Platform on the C# plugin line as shown here:
moon6969 last edited by moon6969
Got this issue again with VS2017 and NPP 7.6.3 source.
The issue appears to be related to the NPP projects default Debugger Type setting of “Auto”… so it was assuming the C++ Native debugger based on the NPP exe.
Changing this to “Managed Only” or “Mixed” sorted it…
Meta Chuh last edited by
thank you for taking the time to share every of your debugger solutions, including vs2017 now.
it’s very helpful and appreciated. 👍
Alan Kilborn last edited by
When you say “debug output” you mean like something “nicer” than logging data to a file? If so what I’ve used in the past is OutputDebugString(). I’m not sure what Windows does with this internally but you can use a small application from Windows called DebugView and it will show those messages being logged in real time.
So I was trying this in a plugin I am dabbling in.
And I couldn’t get it to work.
I put my OutputDebugString() call into the code; it compiles and links just fine.
But when I run it, I don’t see anything in the DebugView window.
If I set a breakpoint on the OutputDebugString() call, it gets hit.
I switched over to N++ source code and added an OutputDebugString() call there; same thing happens – breakpoint hit but no code written to the debug-collector window.
However, if I switch over to Python, running this little DEMO, I do get output in the DebugView window:
The Python test seems to validate, well, something, but I don’t know why I’m not getting any debug output when running my plugin or N++ main source code… Any ideas?
Late thing I noticed: When I start running N++ source under the debugger, I get a line in the DebugView output:
 NVWMI - Base Profile [c:/............/notepad-plus-plus/powereditor/visual.net/x64/unicode debug/notepad++.exe] was launched and [Base Profile] profile was applied
but that seems to be just a startup notification; it still isn’t outputting my simple test string at the right time via
So, again, a call for ideas?
dail last edited by
I only used OutputDebugString() in a very limited fashion a while ago (wow that was over 4 years ago), so I’m not sure what other conditions affect it actually showing up in DebugView. 99.9% of all my debugging is stepping through the code in Visual Studio.
Ekopalypse last edited by
I can imaging that if you run this under the VS Debugger that it will be consumed by it and not forwarded to other windows.
Alan Kilborn last edited by Alan Kilborn
(wow that was over 4 years ago),
Nice that you are still around after that long. :-)
if you run this under the VS Debugger … it will be consumed by it and not forwarded to other windows.
That may be a fairly valid point. :-)
I was actually trying to set it up for a future need where I wouldn’t be running under the debugger.
And running under the debugger while setting it up seemed pretty natural, because I wanted to verify that I actually hit the code I thought I was hitting, especially when it wasn’t working.
I will try without the debugger now…
(…a bit of time goes by…)
You @Ekopalypse sir, hit the nail right on the head:
Thank you for the help.