Community
    • 登入

    TextFX 64-bit binary / source code unavailability?

    已排程 已置頂 已鎖定 已移動 Notepad++ & Plugin Development
    textfx
    47 貼文 20 Posters 138.9k 瀏覽
    正在載入更多貼文
    • 從舊到新
    • 從新到舊
    • 最多點贊
    回覆
    • 在新貼文中回覆
    登入後回覆
    此主題已被刪除。只有擁有主題管理權限的使用者可以查看。
    • Alan KilbornA
      Alan Kilborn @Jeff Johnston
      最後由 編輯

      @Jeff-Johnston said:

      compelling argument for why 64-bit 7.6.6 is superior to 32-bit 7.5.9

      I don’t think there is anything compelling… 64-bit is the future, though…so there’s that.

      1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
      • dinkumoilD
        dinkumoil @Alan Kilborn
        最後由 編輯

        @Alan-Kilborn said:

        but then wouldn’t the original text of the “formula” stay as well?

        Yes it would, as I already wrote in my first NppCalc posting.

        The whole NppCalc thing seems clunky, while in spirit it has some good ideas

        I agree, it is somewhat like a half-baked Excel. But one can open a document in Npp and use it like some kind of dynamic notebook and as such NppCalc can be useful.

        1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 1
        • PeterJonesP
          PeterJones
          最後由 編輯

          @Jeff-Johnston said:

          compelling argument for why 64-bit 7.6.6 is superior

          1. Though 64-bit still has an unreasonably-small file-size limit due to the old Scintilla component, you can still open larger files with Notepad++ 64-bit than with 32-bit
          2. When you do File > Open Containing Folder… > Explorer / cmd, 32-bit Notepad++ will open the 32-bit explorer or cmd.exe window
          3. When running any 32-bit application (like 32-bit Notepad++) in a 64-bit Windows OS, Windows will lie to you: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/desktop/winprog64/file-system-redirector
            • In NPP32 (or cmd.exe 32, or explorer.exe 32, or …), if you try to open a file in %windir%\system32 (which is where the 64bit windows system files go), it will actually open %windir%\syswow64, but will tell you that it’s system32.
            • in NPP32, in order to edit a file that’s really in the 64bit system directory, you have to use the %windir%\sysnative alias
          Alan KilbornA 1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 2
          • Jeff JohnstonJ
            Jeff Johnston
            最後由 編輯

            Really the only big thing in TextFX that I miss a whole lot in Notepad ++ 64 is TextFX > Tools > Sort, which has a lot of useful options (case-sensitive, case-insensitive) and allows you to sort UNIQUE to remove duplicates. Is there anything current that allows that?

            Alan KilbornA 1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 3
            • Alan KilbornA
              Alan Kilborn @Jeff Johnston
              最後由 編輯

              @Jeff-Johnston

              Notepad++ itself has some sorting options (though “case” criterion isn’t there) in the Edit menu’s Line Operations area. A recent (7.6.x) Notepad++ has a Remove Consecutive Duplicate Lines command, which could be used after a sort, to replicate the TextFX “unique sort” feature you described.

              Jeff JohnstonJ 1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 3
              • Alan KilbornA
                Alan Kilborn @PeterJones
                最後由 編輯

                @PeterJones

                Not very compelling. :)

                When you do File > Open Containing Folder… > Explorer / cmd, 32-bit Notepad++ will open the 32-bit explorer or cmd.exe window

                I’m not sure about that one…doesn’t 64-bit Notepad++ open a 64-bit explorer or cmd window?

                1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 1
                • PeterJonesP
                  PeterJones
                  最後由 編輯

                  @Alan-Kilborn said:

                  I’m not sure about that one…doesn’t 64-bit Notepad++ open a 64-bit explorer or cmd window?

                  Yes. And I never see a good reason for not using 64-bit explorer or cmd window. And when 32-bit notepad++ opens a 32-bit explorer or cmd, then explorer/cmd are back to lying to me (#3). I really don’t like that Windows lies to me.

                  Alan KilbornA 1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 2
                  • Alan KilbornA
                    Alan Kilborn @PeterJones
                    最後由 編輯

                    @PeterJones said:

                    I really don’t like that Windows lies to me.

                    Yeah. Do you really edit text files in those areas all that often though?

                    1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 1
                    • PeterJonesP
                      PeterJones
                      最後由 編輯

                      @Alan-Kilborn said:

                      all that often

                      Not really, no. It’s the principle of the thing. ;-)

                      My list above, plus your “64-bit is the future”, was compelling enough for me to make the switch to 64-bit some time back. And it’s compelling enough to show 64-bit is superior… but for some users (especially those who use the special features of TextFX, or of other not-yet-converted plugins), there are still good reasons for staying on 32-bit. Each user needs to weigh the pros and cons, and make an informed decision.

                      1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 2
                      • Jeff JohnstonJ
                        Jeff Johnston @Alan Kilborn
                        最後由 編輯

                        @Alan-Kilborn - That’s very nice, thanks! In that case I think I’ll use 64-bit Notepad++.

                        1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 2
                        • 第一個貼文
                          最後的貼文
                        The Community of users of the Notepad++ text editor.
                        Powered by NodeBB | Contributors