Minimalistic core for UDL description?
-
I have just started using np++, so this may be a known and solved problem. The UDL of np++ allows us to
modify known language descriptions but I am looking for one that is minimalistic in the sense of known symbols.{ }, say. In addition perhaps also some widely used notations for constants and definitely a few empty sets of symbol classes – e.g. identifiers, operators, types, special symbols – with means to add user defined symbols.For the time being I can do with the Java description, which almost fit my bill. A recent example that caused problems were a variant of the following
P{aaa; “bbb”}{…} which I had to rewrite as P({aaa; “bbb”},{…}) to get collapsing correct.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login