Sort Lines Lexicographically did not work

[Dreamspace President]

Just had the same problem. In MY case, the reason was: The file was protected from changes (was opened from TMP folder). I could not type anything.

Once I had saved it as a new file on the desktop, I could type, and thus sorting also worked.

[r l]

It seems that in Notepadd++ 7.7.1 there needs to be at least one empty line after the last line of text, otherwise the sorting function doesn’t do anything.

If end of file is in an empty line after the last line of text, sorting works:
text
text
<EOF>

If end of file is at the end of the last line of text, sorting doesn’t work:
text
text<EOF>

[Alan Kilborn]

@r-l said:

in Notepadd++ 7.7.1 there needs to be at least one empty line after the last line of text, otherwise the sorting function doesn’t do anything

This is NOT true when I try it. Can you provide anything more to help reproduce?

[r l]

You’re right. And I just realized what my mistake was.

I had searched and replaced certain character sequences prior to sorting, to insert linebreaks. In Notepad++ that linebreak must be “\r\n” rather than just “\n”. With correct linebreaks, sorting works fine. With just “\n”, the sorting function sees the whole file as one single line. Likewise, when I add an empty line at the end of the file, it only sorts that empty line to the beginning of the file but doesn’t change the sequency of anything else.

So, sorry for the noise… :-)

[Alan Kilborn]

@r-l said:

In Notepad++ that linebreak must be “\r\n” rather than just “\n”

Only if you want it to be. There are Windows files (\r\n) and there are Linux (\n) files when it comes to “line endings”. If you are doing regular expression replacements, you absolutely need to be careful about using \r\n versus using \n. There is nothing there to protect you from yourself.

And…sorting is known to have problems when you have mixed line-endings in the data, something you shouldn’t allow to happen unless you really know what you are doing, and really need that situation.

[Bill Hepler]

I often have problems sorting text in NotePaid++ - I’m set as Windows CR/LF etc. The problem seems to arise if spaces and tabs are interspersed as beginning of line characters…

Here is an example:

BuildAccount()            // Summary of Posted Transactions
BuildAudAcct()            // Tax Records that relate to Account Records....
BuildAudit()              // Daily & Account
BuildBankRec()
BuildCheque()
BuildContainer()
BuildCounterIDs()  // Apr 2020
BuildDepot( )
BuildEvents( )    // Dec 2019
BuildFinBat()
BuildGrower()
BuildImpBat()
BuildPayGrp()
BuildPostBat()
BuildPrice()
BuildProcess()
BuildProduct()
BuildReceipts()
BuildTax( )
BuildVariety()    // June 2015

BuildChqFmt() // Note the Spaces in front of these lines rather than tabs
BuildRptCfg( ) // this seems to be the cause of the problems
BuildVoid()

[Alan Kilborn]

@Bill-Hepler

The data in the black code region seems already sorted?

What’s the significance of the 3 items below the code box?

And I don’t see any leading spaces/tabs anywhere?

[Matthew Ewer]

@Alan-Kilborn I suspect what happened there is that the lines DID have tabs and spaces, respectively, when they pasted it into their post, but the tabs caused the black box. The three after used a different whitespace, and so were not included in the black box. (But apparently the whitespace was formatted away?) Note that, if you expect sorting to ignore leading whitespace, the three lines after the box should be interspersed between lines within the box (but are not).

[Alan Kilborn]

@Matthew-Ewer

That’s a good explanation of what might have happened here.
But since the OP never returned to continue the exchange, I suppose the issue is dead.

if you expect sorting to ignore leading whitespace

Just a note to say that Notepad++'s sorting doesn’t ignore leading whitespace, just in case someone thinks it can from the above.

[aarocaes]

This post is deleted!

[aarocaes]

Maybe it could be helpful for anyone else. I had this issue, and the problem was related with the line break codes.

Even if you are seeing different lines, is possible that only one of the line break codes (\n or \r) is being used. If that’s the case, sorting won’t work as it will take all the text as just one single line. You can check this enabling the “Show all characters” option:

LF is the code for Line Feed (\n). But it’s missing the CR (Carriage Return, \r) code. Unlike Unix systems, standard line-termination in Windows and in the Internet is \r\n.

So if you replace these line-termination codes activating the extended search mode (replacing \n with \r\n), it will work.

[PeterJones]

@aarocaes ,

Interesting. It sorts correctly for me.

I thought maybe if you have mixed line endings, where some don’t match the current line-endings mode:
=>
Yeah, that’s it: correctly\nsorted and these\nlines were treated as single lines.

So, as long as you don’t have mixed line endings, and your line endings match the defined line endings setting shown in the status bar, it will work. But if there’s a mix or discrepancy, it won’t be treated as a line ending.

[gitberry]

Thank you for these posts - I love everything about NotePad++ EXCEPT line sorting because I’ve never understood why NotePad++ was inconsistent with line sorting until I read this. Now I can use it with more confidence.

On reflection it would seem that this is an unnecessary pain for those who work in all 3 line ending environments and wondering if we couldn’t throw something into settings that could possibly be like this:
[ X ] SORT Line Ending Agnostic (will treat CR, CR-LF and LF equally as line endings when sorting)

[Alan Kilborn]

@gitberry

What is a good example of why someone would need to “mix” line-ending types within one file? I don’t think I’ve ever run across a good reason for this. I welcome being enlightened.

[Terry R]

@gitberry said in Sort Lines Lexicographically did not work:

Line Ending Agnostic (will treat CR, CR-LF and LF equally as line endings when sorting)

If you read @PeterJones post his last remarks were:
So, as long as you don’t have mixed line endings, and your line endings match the defined line endings setting shown in the status bar, it will work.

So if a file ONLY contains 1 type of line ending and that matches the status bar then sorting will work as expected. This seems to me to be a reasonable assumption by the developers.

Maybe I’m naive when to it comes to the various line endings (Unix, Mac vs Windows) but I don’t see why a file would contain a mixture of the 3 types, unless there had been an error in encoding or reading of the file. So AFAIK a file would ONLY ever contain 1 type of line ending, and that depends on the use/environment the file is being used in.

Notepad++ also has a function which resides under Edit main menu, called EOL Conversion where the file is “totally” converted from one type to another. maybe this should be used before a sort operation if at all unsure of whether there is a mixture of types.

Terry

[gitberry]

@Alan-Kilborn So true! I don’t think there is a good reason. When it happens (ie received from am uncaring/uncareful source etc) and the sort doesn’t work…

[Alan Kilborn]

@gitberry said in Sort Lines Lexicographically did not work:

So true! I don’t think there is a good reason. When it happens (ie received from am uncaring/uncareful source etc) and the sort doesn’t work…

If you are likely to get files of that nature from another source, suggest you “sanitize” them before beginning to work with them.

For example, do a line-ending conversion in Notepad++, which will unify the line-endings all to one type (whichever type you desire). After that, do your sort, or whatever other data manipulations you need to do.

(I guess Terry already said the same thing; sorry, didn’t see that first before crafting this reply)

[Alan Kilborn]

@Terry-R said in Sort Lines Lexicographically did not work:

I don’t see why a file would contain a mixture of the 3 types, unless there had been an error in encoding or reading of the file. So AFAIK a file would ONLY ever contain 1 type of line ending, and that depends on the use/environment the file is being used in.

Amen, brother, amen.

However, Notepad++ (Scintilla) doesn’t enforce this.
And, by default, it doesn’t let you know that you have “screwed up” files when this situation happens to occur.

One way for it to occur is the aforementioned reception of files from another source.

Another way for it to happen is a regex replacement where uses think that \n works to match a line-ending of any type. It does NOT ; \R should be used instead for this purpose. But, again, Notepad++ lets you do it, so line-ending weirdness can happen from this.

A good way to “set it and forget it” to avoid this type of problem is by using the EditorConfig plugin. With that, you specify your desired line-ending type, and when files are saved in Notepad++, the plugin steps in and corrects any improper line-endings to your desired type.

An alternative way to monitor the situation is to turn on visible line-endings and then hope you notice a mismatch. However, looking at the “heavy” line-ending character representation is too visually overwhelming for me. YMMV.

[Alan Kilborn]

@gitberry said in Sort Lines Lexicographically did not work:

[ X ] SORT Line Ending Agnostic (will treat CR, CR-LF and LF equally as line endings when sorting)

There’s an open issue on the ISSUE-TRACKER for this; perhaps you wanna add your voice there so it can be heard by developers?

Personally, I don’t think this needs a setting, I think it should ignore line-endings when sorting.

But, for myself, I use the EditorConfig plugin so that I just don’t get into a situation where a sorting problem (and other problems that could occur from this) doesn’t happen.

[mathlete2]

@Alan-Kilborn said in Sort Lines Lexicographically did not work:

For example, do a line-ending conversion in Notepad++, which will unify the line-endings all to one type (whichever type you desire). After that, do your sort, or whatever other data manipulations you need to do.

actually, if you open this menu on a file with a mixture of line endings, the original selection is greyed out; NP++ thinks everything is still unified. perhaps this is a bug?