Perl language syntax highlighting troubles (bug or limitation ?)

[Gilles Maisonneuve]

OOPS, yours :== self.lexer_name, mine :== self_lexer_name, I am really a dumb when dealing with OO programming, can’t realize that ‘self’ is the current object and of course separated by a dot.

Colour has changed for q* keywords and there text (black on dark blue, can’t read but now just need to ajust the colors).
No change for here docs, but don’t know if I properly set the colors, have to check.

Send you a screen copy in a few minutes.

[Gilles Maisonneuve]

@Ekopalypse

All right, nearly done: with the following regexp in your python code:

regexes[(1, (255,0,128))] = (r'\bq[rwqx]{0,1}\b([^\h]).*?\1|(\bq[rwqx]{0,1}\b\h+(\w).*?\3)', [0])
regexes[(2, (255,0,128))] = (r'\bq[rwqx]{0,1}\b\h*(\(.+?\)|\[.+?\]|\{.+?\})', [0])
regexes[(3, (0,0,0))] = (r'(?s)((<<)"*(\w+?)"*;.*?\3)', [2])
regexes[(4, (0,0,0))] = (r'(?s)((<<)\h+"(\w+?)";.*?\3)', [2,3])

I get the following colors:

Q* colors are good {well I might have an uggly taste in colors but at least they match ;-)) }

Would you have any clue about why the here docs= are still not handled properly ? They should be black, I think.

[Ekopalypse]

@Gilles-Maisonneuve

the regexes assumes double quotes and semicolon directly attached to EOT.
Like

print << "EOT";

--------------------- separation line ------------------

EOT

Is there a rule how this is specified?

[Gilles Maisonneuve]

I think I found why.
Your regexp says :
r'(?s)((<<)"*(\w+?)"*;.*?\3)'
would not it be better if :
r'(?s)(\h*(<<)\h*"*(\w+?)"*\h*;.*?\3)'

???

To answer your question:

Perl allows

1. <<TEXT,
2. << TEXT
3. <<‘TEXT’ / << ‘TEXT’
4. <<“TEXT” / << “TEXT”

meanings differ in each case…

[Ekopalypse]

To be honest - I’m not a regex expert at all :-D
If you, as a perl developer, say so I would absolutely believe it is :-)

[Gilles Maisonneuve]

@Ekopalypse

In your Python regexp, what’s the meaning of:

1. “\3”
2. “, [2]” and “[2,3]” ?

If I can understand what I think I could translate a Perl regex code into python (for this case at least).

[Ekopalypse]

What about using this
(?s)((<<)\h+(["|'])(\w+?)\3\h*;.*?\4)

[Ekopalypse]

1. is the boost:regex convention to denote match group 3
   and
2. defines which match group actually should be painted

Like if you have:

r'(word1)(word2)(word3)', [2,3]

would mean that only word2 and word3 would be painted
whereas if you would specify

r'(word1)(word2)(word3)', [0]

everything would be colored.

Does this makes sense to you?

[Gilles Maisonneuve]

@Ekopalypse

I don’t understand your regexp syntax. Perhaps too ‘pythonized’ for me.

(?s) : what does it mean ? is it ‘s///’ ? or really a non capturing group of ‘s’ ???
\3 \4 : are they $3 $4, I don’t think as I can’t see a 4th accumulator

[Ekopalypse]

(?s) is a modifier telling the engine that the dot matches line endings
and yes, the engine uses \1 and $1

Here the link to the documentation - maybe easier for you.

[Ekopalypse]

ooppps

(?s)((<<)\h+(["|'])(\w+?)\3\h*;.*?\3)

:-D

[Gilles Maisonneuve]

This post is deleted!

[Gilles Maisonneuve]

@Ekopalypse

Ok
another one: in Python you must say ["|'] instead of Perl ["'] (‘either one of the set’) ? Is that what it means ?

[Ekopalypse]

No, afaik non-capturing group is (?:pattern)
This, (?s), just tells the engine that the dot . is matching
EOLs like \r\n - if I’m right.

[Ekopalypse]

Just for clarification, the python script does NOT use the python regex engine instead
it uses the one notepad++ offers, the boost::regex.
Yes, you can use the enumeration without the pipe but makes it more visible for me with
the pipe sign. Or is there a difference if used with pipe sign or without?

[Ekopalypse]

or maybe this one might be even better
(?s)(<<)\h+(["'])(\w+?)\2\h*;.*?\3

[Gilles Maisonneuve]

Can’t reply what I wanted, a robot says I’m spamming…

[Ekopalypse]

@Gilles-Maisonneuve

Can’t reply what I wanted, a robot says I’m spamming…

I have no idea why this happens sometimes.

By the way, now that you have installed pythonscript plugin would you mind
clicking Plugins->Python Script->Scripts->Samples->RegexTester ?

I know not everyone is recommending it but, personally, I love it.

[Gilles Maisonneuve]

AFAIK, at least in Perl, ["|'] means double-quote OR pipre OR simple-quote, everything between square brakets is literal. Also true in “awk” and C regexp I think.
I don’t know for Python.

[Gilles Maisonneuve]

@Ekopalypse

Now, if I say in Pyhton (attempt to transliterate from Perl) :

(r'(?s)(\h*(<<)\h*["|']?([^"|^']+?)["|']?\h*;.*?\3)', [2])

does it mean :

1. form REGEXP
2. do not match NL with DOT
3. matches any horizontal blanks (0 or more), don’t make a group
4. matches ‘<<’ make it a group
5. matches any horizontal blanks (0 or more), don’t make a group
6. matches 0 or 1 text quote (either double or single), no group
7. matches a group of any chars not " nor ’ one or more time(s) (in perl it would be [^"'])
8. matches 0 or 1 text quote (either double or single), no group
9. possible blanks until semi-colon, semi-colon, then possible chars until NL

BUT THEN, what does mean ?\3. I’m lost there.