Community
    • Login

    7.8.7 Release Candidate 4

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Announcements
    16 Posts 9 Posters 1.6k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Lucienne1900L
      Lucienne1900
      last edited by

      Wow, fantastic! Now I can go to sleep…

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
      • ArkadiuszMichalskiA
        ArkadiuszMichalski
        last edited by ArkadiuszMichalski

        Is there any list with listing all such no-UI options? I’m asking because I have seen such hidding settings somewhere but I cannot locate them. It would be good to make and put such a list somewhere.

        donhoD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • László BotkaL
          László Botka
          last edited by

          Maybe this could be an option in Preferences / Misc. under the other find options (Don’t fill… / Monospaced …).

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Alan KilbornA
            Alan Kilborn
            last edited by Alan Kilborn

            @donho said in 7.8.7 Release Candidate 4:

            1. Add count of files searched to ‘Find result’ output.

            So in looking at that, I must say the “…of X searched” is a nice addition.

            And I hesitate to call this a critical bug, but I noticed that the singular has now become plural:

            db552d48-d954-474a-b3ff-bdf4a757fe12-image.png

            It sure seems like 1 hits should be 1 hit.
            And 1 files should be 1 file.
            Indeed, checking 7.8.6 it IS the singular form for this case.

            What happened?
            Did the addition of “…of X searched” mess this up somehow?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 5
            • donhoD
              donho
              last edited by

              @Alan-Kilborn
              I just tested:
              411ded5d-948e-47f5-bc42-4181750857d6-image.png

              Do you use custom english.xml for changing some labels?
              If yes, it’s normal - there’s no way to manage it correctly in all supported languages.

              Alan KilbornA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • Alan KilbornA
                Alan Kilborn @donho
                last edited by

                @donho said in 7.8.7 Release Candidate 4:

                Do you use custom english.xml for changing some labels?
                If yes, it’s normal - there’s no way to manage it correctly in all supported languages.

                Yes.
                It’s okay; I understand.
                I think simply by removing the relevant lines entirely from english_customizable.xml I can go back to the way it was.
                For English that should work.

                donhoD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • donhoD
                  donho @Alan Kilborn
                  last edited by donho

                  @Alan-Kilborn

                  I think simply by removing the relevant lines entirely from english_customizable.xml I can go back to the way it was.

                  Or you can just remove this entry from english_customizable.xml - the default one will be used.

                  Alan KilbornA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • Alan KilbornA
                    Alan Kilborn @donho
                    last edited by

                    @donho

                    Yes, I think we just said the same thing in 2 different ways. :-)

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • donhoD
                      donho @ArkadiuszMichalski
                      last edited by

                      @ArkadiuszMichalski said in 7.8.7 Release Candidate 4:

                      Is there any list with listing all such no-UI options? I’m asking because I have seen such hidding settings somewhere but I cannot locate them. It would be good to make and put such a list somewhere.

                      Good idea.
                      I’ll find time to create an entry in https://npp-user-manual.org/docs/preferences/

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                      • Kantor ZsoltK
                        Kantor Zsolt Banned
                        last edited by

                        @donho

                        I have version 7.8.6 64-bit on Win7.
                        If I check auto-completion for words only for C keywords the completion is not working. If I check for functions and words, words completion is working.
                        I’m missing something?

                        EkopalypseE Alan KilbornA 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • EkopalypseE
                          Ekopalypse @Kantor Zsolt
                          last edited by Ekopalypse

                          @Kantor-Zsolt

                          from my understanding function refers to language keywords and methods where as words refers to what has been already typed.
                          Example:

                          int Foo()
                          {
                              return 1;
                          }
                          

                          if having Function completion you would get a completion
                          for int, return or long but not for Foo, where as if you use word completion you will get completion for int and Foo because
                          those have been already typed but you won’t get a completion for long
                          Does this make sense to you?

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 6
                          • Alan KilbornA
                            Alan Kilborn @Kantor Zsolt
                            last edited by

                            @Kantor-Zsolt

                            Please do not post in this thread.
                            Clearly this thread is for discussion of 7.8.7 RC4 (especially critical issues discovered).

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 5
                            • overstopO
                              overstop
                              last edited by

                              Is there a roadmap for Np++ 7.9 and v8?

                              Alan KilbornA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • Alan KilbornA
                                Alan Kilborn @overstop
                                last edited by

                                @overstop

                                Please do not post in this thread.
                                Clearly this thread is for discussion of 7.8.7 RC4 (especially critical issues discovered).

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                The Community of users of the Notepad++ text editor.
                                Powered by NodeBB | Contributors