Community
    • Login

    7.8.7 Release Candidate 4

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Announcements
    16 Posts 9 Posters 1.6k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • László BotkaL
      László Botka
      last edited by

      Maybe this could be an option in Preferences / Misc. under the other find options (Don’t fill… / Monospaced …).

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Alan KilbornA
        Alan Kilborn
        last edited by Alan Kilborn

        @donho said in 7.8.7 Release Candidate 4:

        1. Add count of files searched to ‘Find result’ output.

        So in looking at that, I must say the “…of X searched” is a nice addition.

        And I hesitate to call this a critical bug, but I noticed that the singular has now become plural:

        db552d48-d954-474a-b3ff-bdf4a757fe12-image.png

        It sure seems like 1 hits should be 1 hit.
        And 1 files should be 1 file.
        Indeed, checking 7.8.6 it IS the singular form for this case.

        What happened?
        Did the addition of “…of X searched” mess this up somehow?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 5
        • donhoD
          donho
          last edited by

          @Alan-Kilborn
          I just tested:
          411ded5d-948e-47f5-bc42-4181750857d6-image.png

          Do you use custom english.xml for changing some labels?
          If yes, it’s normal - there’s no way to manage it correctly in all supported languages.

          Alan KilbornA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • Alan KilbornA
            Alan Kilborn @donho
            last edited by

            @donho said in 7.8.7 Release Candidate 4:

            Do you use custom english.xml for changing some labels?
            If yes, it’s normal - there’s no way to manage it correctly in all supported languages.

            Yes.
            It’s okay; I understand.
            I think simply by removing the relevant lines entirely from english_customizable.xml I can go back to the way it was.
            For English that should work.

            donhoD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • donhoD
              donho @Alan Kilborn
              last edited by donho

              @Alan-Kilborn

              I think simply by removing the relevant lines entirely from english_customizable.xml I can go back to the way it was.

              Or you can just remove this entry from english_customizable.xml - the default one will be used.

              Alan KilbornA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • Alan KilbornA
                Alan Kilborn @donho
                last edited by

                @donho

                Yes, I think we just said the same thing in 2 different ways. :-)

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • donhoD
                  donho @ArkadiuszMichalski
                  last edited by

                  @ArkadiuszMichalski said in 7.8.7 Release Candidate 4:

                  Is there any list with listing all such no-UI options? I’m asking because I have seen such hidding settings somewhere but I cannot locate them. It would be good to make and put such a list somewhere.

                  Good idea.
                  I’ll find time to create an entry in https://npp-user-manual.org/docs/preferences/

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                  • Kantor ZsoltK
                    Kantor Zsolt Banned
                    last edited by

                    @donho

                    I have version 7.8.6 64-bit on Win7.
                    If I check auto-completion for words only for C keywords the completion is not working. If I check for functions and words, words completion is working.
                    I’m missing something?

                    EkopalypseE Alan KilbornA 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • EkopalypseE
                      Ekopalypse @Kantor Zsolt
                      last edited by Ekopalypse

                      @Kantor-Zsolt

                      from my understanding function refers to language keywords and methods where as words refers to what has been already typed.
                      Example:

                      int Foo()
                      {
                          return 1;
                      }
                      

                      if having Function completion you would get a completion
                      for int, return or long but not for Foo, where as if you use word completion you will get completion for int and Foo because
                      those have been already typed but you won’t get a completion for long
                      Does this make sense to you?

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 6
                      • Alan KilbornA
                        Alan Kilborn @Kantor Zsolt
                        last edited by

                        @Kantor-Zsolt

                        Please do not post in this thread.
                        Clearly this thread is for discussion of 7.8.7 RC4 (especially critical issues discovered).

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 5
                        • overstopO
                          overstop
                          last edited by

                          Is there a roadmap for Np++ 7.9 and v8?

                          Alan KilbornA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • Alan KilbornA
                            Alan Kilborn @overstop
                            last edited by

                            @overstop

                            Please do not post in this thread.
                            Clearly this thread is for discussion of 7.8.7 RC4 (especially critical issues discovered).

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            The Community of users of the Notepad++ text editor.
                            Powered by NodeBB | Contributors