How to replace all content from XML tag with blank in notepad++?
-
I would like to remove all content from id=“*” within a tag and replace with blank. There are 100s of different id values and I would like to remove all of it.
<Type>Computer</Type>
<deductible id=“d6349782384236423784ABD#1212” >
<Type>Standard</Type>
</deductible>
<limit id=“1123123VHGHJKJH65776BJHBHG9”>
<Type>Aggregate</Type>
<ivalue>10000</ivalue>I want output like this:
<Type>Computer</Type>
<deductible>
<Type>Standard</Type>
</deductible>
<limit>
<Type>Aggregate</Type>
<ivalue>10000</ivalue> -
Hi @rajat-narang, All:
-Try this:
Open the Replace dialog (
Ctrl + H
) and type in:Search: (?-s)\x20id="[^"]+"\x20? Replace: [leave empty]
or (if curly quotes are used)
Search: (?-s)\x20id=“[^”]+”\x20? Replace: [leave empty]
Check the
Wrap around
option
Select theRegular expression search mode
Click on the `Replace All´´ buttonHope this helps.
-
@astrosofista said in How to replace all content from XML tag with blank in notepad++?:
(?-s)\x20id=“[^”]+”\x20?
Thank you so much ! It worked perfectly
-
@rajat-narang said in How to replace all content from XML tag with blank in notepad++?:
Thank you so much ! It worked perfectly
Glad it helped you.
BTW, I forgot to remove the (?-s) modifier, as the
*
is not used in the expression. It does no harm, but it’s useless. -
BTW, I forgot to remove the (?-s) modifier, as the
*
is not used in the expression. It does no harm, but it’s useless.Nitpick: it’s the
.
operator that is affected by(?-s)
, not the*
, since thes
flag is “dot matches newline”. But.
wasn’t used in your expression, either, so the flag-clearing is still useless. :-)Well, not completely useless. As we help people in the forums, always including either
(?-s)
or(?s)
will ensure we never have to care what the status of their checkbox is, so having one of the two in our default answer-regex is a good idea. ;-) -
@PeterJones said in How to replace all content from XML tag with blank in notepad++?:
Nitpick: it’s the . operator that is affected by (?-s), not the *, since the s flag is “dot matches newline”. But . wasn’t used in your expression, either, so the flag-clearing is still useless. :-)
Yep, my bad, I stated a wrong reason, thank you for notice it :)
Well, not completely useless. As we help people in the forums, always including either (?-s) or (?s) will ensure we never have to care what the status of their checkbox is, so having one of the two in our default answer-regex is a good idea. ;-)
Agree, learned that in this forum, so the (?-s) modifier is my default setup.
Cheers