Community
    • 登入

    Replace character in capture group

    已排程 已置頂 已鎖定 已移動 Help wanted · · · – – – · · ·
    28 貼文 7 Posters 6.4k 瀏覽
    正在載入更多貼文
    • 從舊到新
    • 從新到舊
    • 最多點贊
    回覆
    • 在新貼文中回覆
    登入後回覆
    此主題已被刪除。只有擁有主題管理權限的使用者可以查看。
    • Alan KilbornA
      Alan Kilborn @M Andre Z Eckenrode
      最後由 編輯

      @M-Andre-Z-Eckenrode

      DO NOT rely on regex101 for the more esoteric aspects of regex. Doing so, and then intending to use the results in Notepad++ will cause frustration. Sure, okay, for simple cases, but the caliber of stuff you have been discussing in this thread is going to be different in N++ and regex101.

      M Andre Z EckenrodeM 1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 1
      • M Andre Z EckenrodeM
        M Andre Z Eckenrode @PeterJones
        最後由 編輯

        @PeterJones said in Replace character in capture group:

        Could you both look at the proposed capture groups and backreferences phrasing and substitution phrasing , and make sure that the updated sections makes the distinction more clear?

        Looks good to me so far, though coming from a fairly green regex user like me, I’d take that with a grain of salt. :-)

        On a tangent here, I’ve noticed, on occasion when doing find/replace operations, that the In selection checkbox was sometimes ghosted (not available to check or uncheck), which I keep meaning to compile a list of circumstances for presentation and inquiry in these forums sometime. I notice that in both official and proposed versions of the doc, there seems to be no mention of any limitations on when the In selection checkbox is available. There seem to be some known limitations (at least one of which is mentioned here). Maybe they should be added to the docs?

        Alan KilbornA PeterJonesP 2 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 1
        • M Andre Z EckenrodeM
          M Andre Z Eckenrode @Alan Kilborn
          最後由 編輯

          @Alan-Kilborn said in Replace character in capture group:

          the caliber of stuff you have been discussing in this thread is going to be different in N++ and regex101.

          I think I’ve already made it fairly clear, in my previous posts to this thread, that that’s what I’m finding to be the case.

          Alan KilbornA 1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
          • Alan KilbornA
            Alan Kilborn @M Andre Z Eckenrode
            最後由 編輯

            @M-Andre-Z-Eckenrode said in Replace character in capture group:

            I think I’ve already made it fairly clear, in my previous posts to this thread, that that’s what I’m finding to be the case.

            Perhaps, but I get the feeling you might be holding on to regex101 a bit much. :-)

            Plus, I’m kind of a late joiner to this thread; there’s a lot of content.

            1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
            • Alan KilbornA
              Alan Kilborn @M Andre Z Eckenrode
              最後由 Alan Kilborn 編輯

              @M-Andre-Z-Eckenrode said in Replace character in capture group:

              In selection checkbox was sometimes ghosted

              In selection checkbox enabled condition: A single selection of one or more characters, that is NOT a column block selection.

              Note that the checkbox’s appearance status can only be relied upon when you actually switch input focus to the find (family) window – upon activation the code runs a check to make sure you have the proper type of selection, and updates the checkbox and its state at that time.

              1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 1
              • PeterJonesP
                PeterJones @M Andre Z Eckenrode
                最後由 編輯

                @M-Andre-Z-Eckenrode said in Replace character in capture group:

                Looks good to me so far

                Thanks. Submitted PR #127. Hopefully, it will make it in before the next release of the npp-user-manual.org website.

                Alan KilbornA 1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                • Alan KilbornA
                  Alan Kilborn @PeterJones
                  最後由 Alan Kilborn 編輯

                  @PeterJones said in Replace character in capture group:

                  Looks good to me so far

                  Looked fine to me as well.
                  Thanks for your fine attention to the manual.
                  I just need to read it more when I have trouble with things. :-)

                  1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 1
                  • guy038G
                    guy038
                    最後由 編輯

                    Hello, @peterjones,

                    Sorry, I’ve just seen your post where you asked people to verify the N++ official documentation ! I’ll try to have a look, myself, very soon. It would be better to do it before the next release of the website !

                    But, as I said to Alan, at the moment, my TO DO list, concerning N++ or else, is getting much longer ;-))

                    Cheers,

                    guy038

                    1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                    • 第一個貼文
                      最後的貼文
                    The Community of users of the Notepad++ text editor.
                    Powered by NodeBB | Contributors