notepad++ flagged as malicious, should i worry?
-
i run process explorer that can automatically submit file images to virus total. I noticed that notepad++ had a one out of 70 which indicated someone flagged it. I dropped it into hybrid analysis and it came back as a positive period here are the links to that analysis. Should we be concerned? Or is this a normal false positive?
thanks, can reach me at valiskeogh@ gmail.com
https://hybrid-analysis.com/sample/ca3f56a705b26536b44f9213dd75f420139902f8d0a2851b176351cd3dab8685
-
-
@Zhane-Hernandez said in notepad++ flagged as malicious, should i worry?:
https://hybrid-analysis.com/sample/ca3f56a705b26536b44f9213dd75f420139902f8d0a2851b176351cd3dab8685
Did you check that hybrid-analysis report?!
I found itsRisk Assessment
part hilarious (remember, N++ is a text editor, so who would e.g. expect it to work with the Clipboard or the keyboard ;-) ), so commented some stuff below:Spyware Contains ability to open the clipboard Contains ability to read clipboard data Contains ability to retrieve keyboard strokes Found a string that may be used as part of an injection method Fingerprint Contains ability to retrieve information about the current system Queries process information Evasive Found a Wine emulator related string Marks file for deletion Possibly tries to evade analysis by sleeping many times
From the Spyware part is only interesting the “Found a string that may be used as part of an injection method” - I guess it will be a N++ or its underlying libraries autodetection pattern string signs for different shells recognition etc.
Fingerprint part is a typical AV nonsense, that stuff use 99% apps.
And Evasive - “Wine emulator related string” is correctly there because N++ needs to detect&disable some stuff (e.g. Scintilla DirectWrite) while running under the WINE emulator. “Marks file for deletion” probably means that the AV scanner just found the MS MoveFileEx WINAPI sign used in the code or the NSIS installer postponed deletion of the loaded NppShell extension. “Possibly tries to evade analysis by sleeping many times” - here IDK whether to laugh or cry at the state of the so-called “risk detection”.