Search++ (\W)'(\w) regex replace failure

[M Andre Z Eckenrode]

@Coises

On the outside chance that specifics of the variants of my regex replacement anomalies are useful, here is some detailed information about them and the circumstances of their appearance… I started with an unsaved ANSI text tab/buffer with:

Search++ Regex

(\W)'(\w)
\1’\2

this
'Cos I am
that

this
'Round and 'round
that

------------------------------------------------------------------

… and the example text (this[CRLF]'Cos to 'round[CRLF]that followed by [blank line]/[dashed line]/[blank line]) repeated 9 times below (total of 10 times). The anomalies occurred on the following lines during this first experiment:

Line 27:
-’-os I am

Lines 51–52:
’Round and
’hound

Lines 62–63:
a’
ound and ’round

Second experiment:

Line 11:
-’-ound and ’round

Line 27:
-’-os I am

Line 57:
-’-os I am

Lines 87–88:
[blank line]
’tos I am

Third experiment:

Line 10:
this-’-ound and ’round

Line 16:
-’-os I am

Line 40:
-’-ound and ’round

Line 60:
’Round and-’-ound

Line 90:
’Round and-’-ound

[Coises]

@M-Andre-Z-Eckenrode said:

here is some detailed information

Thank you. At this point I am still stumped as to how to find this needle in a haystack. Any information could turn out to be helpful. I appreciate your perseverance.

[Coises]

@M-Andre-Z-Eckenrode:

Have you ever noticed arbitrary junk character replacements with any other regular expression / replacement pairs, or only with this particular one?

[M Andre Z Eckenrode]

@Coises said:

Have you ever noticed arbitrary junk character replacements with any other regular expression / replacement pairs, or only with this particular one?

I haven’t actually tried any others with Search++, so far. The vast majority of my regex operations are accomplished via PythonScript, and I only very infrequently need to perform a standalone regex. But I’ll keep Search++ in mind if/when another one becomes necessary.

[mpheath]

@M-Andre-Z-Eckenrode I may not fully understand the regex task with using groups when ' can be at the start of a line with a word character following as to \W can match the preceding LineFeed character. The LineFeed character seems unwise to capture in my opinion. \W can change behavior depending on encoding so might be challenging to use so perhaps if can be avoided, then that might be better.

The find pattern of \B'\b and replace with ’ might be safer to use as to using anchors to qualify the match instead of consuming with groups which may need more complex conditional handling.

[guy038]

Hello, @m-andre-z-eckenrode, @coises, @mpheath and All,

@mpheath, you said :

The find pattern of \B'\b and replace with ’ might be safer to use as to using anchors to qualify the match instead of consuming with groups which may need more complex conditional handling.

I totally agree with this statement !

That is why I proposed, in my initial post, this alternate formulation :

FIND (?<=\W)'(?=\w)

REPLACE ’

which do not contain any group !

---

Indeed, the \B'\b and (?<=\W)'(?=\w) Find regexes are equivalent and a Replace All operation would change this INPUT text, below :

't'e's't' 't'o' 's'e'e' 't'h'e' 'm'a't'c'h'e's'

By this one :

’t'e's't' ’t'o' ’s'e'e' ’t'h'e' ’m'a't'c'h'e's'

In other words, any single quote char, preceded by a non-word char and followed with a word char, is changed into the ’ character ( \x{2019} RIGHT SINGLE QUOTATION MARK )

Best Regards,

guy038

[M Andre Z Eckenrode]

@mpheath & @guy038

Thanks much for the suggestions, though as stated in my other similar topic, which isn’t specific to Search++, I already found and used a working alternate method to achieve what I wanted, and only really started that topic to try to understand why the (\W)'(\w) method did NOT work, while THIS topic is only really to report the aberrant replacements seemingly caused by Search++.

[M Andre Z Eckenrode]

@Coises

For what it’s worth, I asked my brother, whom I know also uses Notepad++, to indulge me by repeating my Search++ regex experiments on his own computer, and he kindly did so after encountering some initial problems getting Search++ to work at all (see below for details of that). Anyway, he used a fresh portable copy with the latest versions of both, as I have, and reports getting one anomalous replacement while stepping through a text field made up of 11 copies of my recently reported example text. I think that duplicating the problem almost invariably requires many matches and replacement attempts, since it’s so hit or miss for whatever reason.

About my brother’s initial failures to get Search++ to load in his portable copy: His first four or so tries were attempted in different virtual machines on his computer, including the very first one being Windows 11’s built-in “Sandbox”. All of them failed with messages such as “The specified module could not be found” and “Search++.dll is not compatible with the current version of Notepad++”. But when he tried the same set of files on his real machine, it worked. He routinely runs various other programs in virtual machines just fine.

[Coises]

@M-Andre-Z-Eckenrode said:
For what it’s worth, I asked my brother, whom I know also uses Notepad++, to indulge me by repeating my Search++ regex experiments on his own computer, and he kindly did so after encountering some initial problems getting Search++ to work at all (see below for details of that). Anyway, he used a fresh portable copy with the latest versions of both, as I have, and reports getting one anomalous replacement while stepping through a text field made up of 11 copies of my recently reported example text. I think that duplicating the problem almost invariably requires many matches and replacement attempts, since it’s so hit or miss for whatever reason.

Thank you, and thanks to your brother!

Is he also using 32-bit Notepad++?

About my brother’s initial failures to get Search++ to load in his portable copy: His first four or so tries were attempted in different virtual machines on his computer, including the very first one being Windows 11’s built-in “Sandbox”. All of them failed with messages such as “The specified module could not be found” and “Search++.dll is not compatible with the current version of Notepad++”. But when he tried the same set of files on his real machine, it worked. He routinely runs various other programs in virtual machines just fine.

I just tried the same thing in Windows 10 Sandbox on my system and it also failed, with the same message. I will have to investigate that. Off the top of my head, I don’t know why that would happen. My guess (that’s all it is for now) is there’s some sort of C++ runtime dependency that nearly everyone has installed on their main machines, but that doesn’t carry over automatically to a virtual machine or a sandbox.

[M Andre Z Eckenrode]

@Coises said:

Is he also using 32-bit Notepad++?

His routinely-used copy is v8.9.3 x64 portable.