Using the PythonScript plugin to automate N++
-
@Alan-Kilborn said in Using the PythonScript plugin to automate N++:
thanks for not having an emotional overreaction to my comments the way some people do.
I have experience with people who seem brusque when communicating over the Internet - heck, I am “those people” sometimes.
IMO, Notepad++ is “well polished” but maybe it has enough quirks to keep things interesting. :-)
Okay, I’ll go with “quirky”.
@Ekopalypse:
Two questions for you -- I’m trying to
import
yourtaskdialog.py
script into mine, but I’m getting this error:
File "{...}\AppData\Roaming\Notepad++\plugins\Config\PythonScript\scripts\taskdialog.py", line 400, in show None if self.checked_verification is None else ctypes.byref(wintypes.INT(self.checked_verification)) ctypes.ArgumentError: argument 1: <type 'exceptions.TypeError'>: expected LP_TASKDIALOGCONFIG instance instead of pointer to TASKDIALOGCONFIG
Is this a bug in your script, or mine (or both)?
I want my dialog to contain a group of checkboxes, but your script seems to only allow for one. What do I need to do to get this?Never mind. I found the Windows documentation for the TaskDialog routines and realized that this is just a slightly fancier version of “Abort, Retry, Ignore?” - IOW, it’s still not configurable enough for what I want, and everybody uses GUI IDEs to build these now, so there’s very little info out there on how to “roll your own”.
- I’m trying to
-
Let me check - I will follow up later today.
-
I was not able to replicate the error you mentioned, but unfortunately while testing I found a serious problem that could lead to a hanging or even crashing npp. This needs to be investigated further.
-
@Ekopalypse said in Using the PythonScript plugin to automate N++:
maybe it should be wrapped in a try block and if it can’t be found a MessageBox is called explaining this.
@TBugReporter said in Using the PythonScript plugin to automate N++:
You mean like this one? 😉
@Ekopalypse said in Using the PythonScript plugin to automate N++:
Yes, but no - more in the direction pointing to the package that contains the Tkinter module.
I’ve now added code to my script that comes close to doing this. An excerpt:
tk_ok = False try: # see if we can do pretty dialogs import Tkinter as tk import ttk import qq # DEBUG: bogus name to force error triggering tk_ok = True except ImportError as e: # if not, tell user console.show() user_response = notepad.messageBox( (tk_err_msg + e.message ), "Missing Library", MESSAGEBOXFLAGS.OKCANCEL | MESSAGEBOXFLAGS.ICONWARNING | MB_HELP) if user_response == MESSAGEBOXFLAGS.RESULTCANCEL: print("== RESULTCANCEL loading Tkinter") # DEBUG notepad.runPluginCommand('Python Script', 'Stop Script')
This produces the following box:
Given that MB_HELP isn’t defined as part of PythonScript’s MESSAGEBOXFLAGS, it seems that no one anticipated anyone wanting to add a “Help” button to a MessageBox. Can someone here help me finish this feature for my script? Apparently, the “Help” button sends a message to the parent process, but do I have to add code to listen for and react to this message? Examples I’ve seen for other languages make it seem like I only need to define a URL to be accessed when the button is clicked, but again, I’m having a hard time translating those examples to PythonScript.(Also, I realize that with this question, I’m again straying away from N++ - for which I was soundly rebuked last time - but I’m thinking that interest in the larger goal of developing a more elegant way to inform PythonScript users of missing libraries might outweigh that concern.)
-
@TBugReporter said in Using the PythonScript plugin to automate N++:
notepad.runPluginCommand('Python Script', 'Stop Script')
I thought we told you this was a “bad idea”; wasn’t there a discussion of how to “properly” end a script?
I’m again straying away from N++ - for which I was soundly rebuked last time
Nah, you go ahead if you want…
but I’m thinking that interest in the larger goal of developing a more elegant way to inform PythonScript users of missing libraries might outweigh that concern.
IMO, nobody’s concern is all that great, but if you think so then by all means proceed.
Given that MB_HELP isn’t defined as part of PythonScript’s MESSAGEBOXFLAGS, it seems that no one anticipated anyone wanting to add a “Help” button to a MessageBox.
A full-fledged polished programming environment/suite was never really what PS’s designers had in mind. A lot of times Python programs are referred to as “scripts” (which is really a poor thing to do for Python), but here we really are “scripting”, which is intended to be rather lightweight. It’s even in the name of the plugin.
I use it for the power it can give me over the editor, not its UI capabilities, or its “full-fledgeness”.
IMO you are heading down the wrong road, but let’s see where you end up…
-
@Alan-Kilborn said in Using the PythonScript plugin to automate N++:
wasn’t there a discussion of how to “properly” end a script?
Yeah, I just never got around to changing that. (I’m retired, so I tend to do whatever I find entertaining at the moment.)
@TBugReporter said in Using the PythonScript plugin to automate N++:
I’m again straying away from N++ - for which I was soundly rebuked last time
@Alan-Kilborn said in Using the PythonScript plugin to automate N++:
Nah, you go ahead if you want…
nobody’s concern is all that great, but if you think so then by all means proceed.
Okay, perhaps my own enthusiasm for the project may have caused me to misread the temperature of the room - but as I said, I do as I like, and this project has intrigued me. It may end up as just another of my unfinished projects, but for now, I’ll keep banging on it.
IMO you are heading down the wrong road, but let’s see where you end up…
So what do you consider “the right road”? Maybe that road will intrigue me more. 🙂
In software development, nothing is impossible, except making every user happy.
— Notepad++ (@Notepad_plus) -
@TBugReporter and All
I have created a taskdialog module that hopefully,
works with PS2 and PS3 without any side effects.
See the readme for more information on how to use it.
If there is anything unclear or difficulties, do not hesitate to open an issue in the repo. -
@Alan-Kilborn said in Using the PythonScript plugin to automate N++:
I thought we told you this was a “bad idea”; wasn’t there a discussion of how to “properly” end a script?
I now remember why I didn’t change this. Your “proper” method doesn’t work for me when the reason to end the script is detected in a sub-(sub-sub-…)routine - it just ends the subroutine. Or am I (again) doing it wrong?
-
@TBugReporter said in Using the PythonScript plugin to automate N++:
Your “proper” method doesn’t work for me when the reason to end the script is detected in a sub-(sub-sub-…)routine - it just ends the subroutine.
Not my method; Python’s.
Here’s some more pure Python (that is on-topic for this forum only because we’re talking about exiting PythonScripts) that answers the question; simply run it to see the effect, varying the
if
infunc3()
betweenif 1
andif 0
for a couple of runs.# -*- coding: utf-8 -*- from __future__ import print_function class Exit_exception(Exception): pass def func3(): if 0: print('func3 determined we should end and do it QUICKLY') raise Exit_exception() else: print('func3 determined we should proceed in an orderly fashion') def func2(): print('entered func2, about to call func3') func3() print('back in func2, after calling func3') def func1(): print('entered func1, about to call func2') func2() print('back in func1, after calling func2') def main(): print('entering main, about to call func1') try: func1() except Exit_exception: print('back in main and making an exceptional exit!') return print('back in main, after calling func1') main()
This is a bit more “advanced” than what was discussed before; I didn’t share it then because it is more complicated and didn’t seem necessary at the time.
So for the
if 0
case, all proceeds normally and in-sequence:entering main, about to call func1 entered func1, about to call func2 entered func2, about to call func3 func3 determined we should proceed in an orderly fashion back in func2, after calling func3 back in func1, after calling func2 back in main, after calling func1
If the code is changed to
if 1
, then we obtain:entering main, about to call func1 entered func1, about to call func2 entered func2, about to call func3 func3 determined we should end and do it QUICKLY back in main and making an exceptional exit!
BTW, this is just a “nice” way of achieving the goal. If you want to end abruptly and rudely, just insert this line of code where you want to achieve it:
1/0
<-- yep, just a 3-character line of codeSide note: The exception technique can also be used to get out of deeply nested loops, example new
func2
:def func2(): print('entered func2, about to call func3') try: while True: while True: while True: while True: while True: while True: while True: while True: func3() raise Exit_exception() except Exit_exception: pass print('back in func2, after calling func3')
-
Just as an aside from @Alan-Kilborn’s excellent example of using an exception to bomb out: he handled the exception in
main()
– and that’s probably Python best-practice, and the right way to show it in an example that others followBut just so that you know: if you ever forget to handle an exception, the PythonScript plugin will be forgiving, and won’t exit Notepad++ for you. It will show the traceback for the exception, and will relinquish control back to Notepad++. You’ll have a nice red message
raise Exception()
And if you want additional information in your exception printout, you can add it as a text argument when you raise the exception
raise Exception("extra text")
Or, using Alan’s
Exit_exception()
sub-class, the name of the class becomes an indicator of what kind of exception it was:But however you call the exception: after seeing such a red error, you will then want to fix your script so that it won’t happen again.
And if you want a clean exit – it’s not an “error”, just a way to leave a deep subroutine early – then handling that clean-exit-exception in
main()
is the Right Thing To Do™TL;DR summary
Catching exceptions at some point is Python best-practice, but if you miss catching one, the PythonScript plugin will not exit Notepad++. Thus, if you want to exit a script early or promptly, raising an exception is a much better choice than using
notepad.runPluginCommand('Python Script', 'Stop Script')
to push the menu button for you -
I just noticed that we dealt with the topic of “early return” from a PythonScript before, HERE. That time, the simple return-from-main() technique satisfied the petitioner. :-)
-
This post is deleted! -
Is there any way that the PythonScript plugin can determine the size and position of the N++ window?
-
as an example
import ctypes from ctypes import wintypes rect = wintypes.RECT() user32 = ctypes.WinDLL("user32") hwnd = user32.FindWindowW(u"Notepad++", None) user32.GetWindowRect(hwnd, ctypes.byref(rect)) print("position = ({},{})".format(rect.top, rect.left)) print("width = {}".format(rect.right - rect.left)) print("height = {}".format(rect.bottom - rect.top))
Be careful though, these are the outputs for my main and secondary monitor for example
position = (0,459) width = 1079 height = 1087 >>> position = (-440,1912) width = 1096 height = 1936
and when you start making more and more C interop calls, do yourself a favor and create your own startup.py script (you create it like any other script, but just call it startup.py. It should be stored alongside your other scripts so that it doesn’t conflict with the startup.py that comes with PS by default)
and do something like this
from win_api import FindWindow, FindWindowEx notepad.hwnd = FindWindow(u'Notepad++', None) editor1.hwnd = FindWindowEx(notepad.hwnd, None, u"Scintilla", None) editor2.hwnd = FindWindowEx(notepad.hwnd, editor1.hwnd, u"Scintilla", None)
win_api is another file that contains all your C type declarations.
Just a suggestion. -
@Ekopalypse said in Using the PythonScript plugin to automate N++:
FindWindow(u’Notepad++', None)
If you have multiple instances of Notepad++ running, is this guaranteed to find the one that the script code is executing within?
-
normaly yes - but 100% guaranteed - I assume no.
-
@Ekopalypse said in Using the PythonScript plugin to automate N++:
normaly yes - but 100% guaranteed - I assume no.
I asked because I have some more complicated code to find the correct N++, and I was wondering if it was necessary. I’ll keep it. :-)
-
It would be nice if PS would provide this, I know there is an open issue …
-
@Ekopalypse said in Using the PythonScript plugin to automate N++:
would be nice if PS would provide this, I know there is an open issue
Yes, HERE, but from the comment HERE the primary person maintaining PS seemed to have no clue as to why it would be valuable. :-(
-
@Alan-Kilborn said in Using the PythonScript plugin to automate N++:
I have some more complicated code to find the correct N++
Would you mind sharing?