Community
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. Popular
    Log in to post
    • All Time
    • Day
    • Week
    • Month
    • All Topics
    • New Topics
    • Watched Topics
    • Unreplied Topics

    • All categories
    • donhoD

      Notepad++ release 8.9.8

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Announcements
      9
      5 Votes
      9 Posts
      2k Views
      Ivan BútoraI
      @PeterJones Thanks for the tips. None of the .exe files had the blocks. I ran the update manually and how finally the Plugins Admin option has shown up. I was wondering whether there was some change in nppPluginList.dll that might have been incompatible with my OS (Windows 7). But it seems everything is OK for now.
    • Morten SiljubergM

      Why do Notepad++ keep the "Move to recycle bin" delete prompt?

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
      3
      0 Votes
      3 Posts
      123 Views
      MarkusBodenseeM
      Microsoft didn’t remove the prompt, but made it configurable, so you can decide if you want to keep it or not. Configuration can be found for example with right click --> properties on the recycle bin icon.
    • Neculai I. FantanaruN

      Add Increment Number (part 2)

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Help wanted · · · – – – · · ·
      7
      0 Votes
      7 Posts
      124 Views
      CoisesC
      @PeterJones said: PeterJones said: I assume the Search++ syntax would be the same Per the Search++ announcement, it can do the numeric calculations that were first developed for Columns++. I should update the FAQ soon… I recommend waiting on that update. Search++ is not “production ready” yet. People shouldn’t be using it at present unless they want to be beta testers. Once I reach a 1.0 release I’ll make a serious effort to avoid changing things that people would expect to stay the same, but right now, anything could be changed at any time. Numeric expressions in Search++ do not have quite all the features of numeric expressions in Columns++; in particular, the history options (using the values captured or computed in a previous match) aren’t supported in Search++, and the exprtk return statement isn’t supported. However, I think all the features directly cited in the Math FAQ are included. The reg(1) syntax still works, but in Search++ you can use $1 as well. However, a quirk is that since Search++ doesn’t have the persistent Decimal separator is comma option of Columns++, it’s necessary to use regc(1) or $$1 for European-style numbers with periods and/or commas. Finally, Columns++ can only work on the active document. Search++ has a Find in Files option, but Replace in Files has not yet been implemented. So if your guess was correct and @neculai-i.-fantanaru wants a regular expression because it must be applied to many files at once, @thomas-knoefel’s MultiReplace is the best choice among presently-existing options. Oh, and MultiReplace has recently added an option to use exprtk formulas as an alternative to its Lua syntax.