Hello, @gstavi and All, I completely agree with both of your statements: Professionals, when they reach that scale (and long before), use command line tools. Then they open the found files in an editor. Possibly Notepad++. And : But again, opinions of people who can’t mix and match the right tool for the job and insist that every tool should adapt itself to their selfish needs should not have much weight. Best Regards, guy038

1.2.1 Syntax highlighting PowerShell Added document comment syntax highlighting [image: 1785067576590-doxygen1.png] [image: 1785067576858-doxygen2.png] Added injected code syntax highligting (inside @''@ or @""@). [image: 1785067606620-member1-resized.png] [image: 1785067607237-member2.png] Types ([int], [string], …) got smooth colors Updated keywords and built-in variables (PSObject, $this, …) AutoHotkey Improved JsDoc (document comments) highlighting [image: 1785067628669-doxygen.png] [image: 1785067628705-doxygen2.png] Improved @Ahk2Exe-Keep comments (shows code that will be executed only if it was compiled via Ahk2Exe) [image: 1785067642264-keep1.png] [image: 1785067642424-keep2.png] Improved ahk2exe directives colors (displays all directives). Type any directive, like console or keep, and auto-completion will insert code snippet with this directive Fixed Issues with paths syntax highlighting (relative and absolute). [image: 1785067694213-paths.png] Variables interpolation inside quotes and paths [image: 1785067703084-interpolation1.png] Unexpected orange background, light theme, wrong font and colors on some systems. Removed unavailable/empty themes. Missing return types in popup docs and functions hints for some AutoHotkey built-in functions.

Hello, @troglo37 and All, OK. So let’s start off slow ! First of all, I’d like to check with you to make sure we’re on the same page about our goal : If we begin with this text : Our friends Sarunas, Dorde, Orjan, Pawel, Stefania, Angel and Ugur had already left Our friends Šarūnas, Đorđe, Ørjan, Paweł, Ștefania, Ángel and Uğur had already left Our friends Šarūnas, Đorđe, Ørjan, Paweł, Ștefania, Ángel and Uğur had already left As you can notice these lines are quite similar and differ only because of some accents in the first names : The first line does not contain any accent The second line contains some characters with an accent. Here are their Unicode values : Š = 0160 ū = 016B Đ = 0110 đ = 0111 Ø = 00D8 ł = 0142 Ș = 0218 Á = 00C1 ğ = 011F The third line contains — when it was possible to find an equivalent — a classical ASCII letter immediately followed with a combining diacritical mark — an accent — thus two characters for one glyph. However, the letters Đ, đ, Ø and ł, without equivalent, are single characters only, like above ! S + 030C = Š u + 0304 = ū Đ = 0110 đ = 0111 Ø = 00D8 ł = 0142 S + 0326 = Ș A + 0301 = Á g + 0306 = ğ Now, I assume you’d be interested in finding any of these three syntaxes — or others like them — at the same time, in your file(s), right ? @troglo37, just tell me if this is your goal ? See you later ! Best Regards, guy038