@PeterJones said: If you’ve got steps that work for doing a local debug build, that would be helpful. > where cmake C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\BuildTools\Common7\IDE\CommonExtensions\Microsoft\CMake\CMake\bin\cmake.exe > type .\build_gup.ps1 param ( [string]$Configuration = "Debug", [string]$Platform = "x64" ) if (-not $(Test-Path "${PSScriptRoot}\wingup\.git")) { git clone --single-branch https://github.com/notepad-plus-plus/wingup.git wingup } try { pushd "${PSScriptRoot}\wingup" $CmakeArchParam=$(if ("$Platform" -imatch "x86") {"Win32"} else {"$Platform"}) $LibPlatform=$(if ("$Platform" -imatch "Win32") {"x86"} else {"$Platform"}) cmake -S ".\curl" -B ".\curl\build\$LibPlatform" -A $CmakeArchParam ` -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=OFF ` -DCURL_STATIC_CRT=ON ` -DBUILD_CURL_EXE=OFF ` -DCURL_USE_SCHANNEL=ON ` -DCURL_USE_OPENSSL=OFF ` -DBUILD_TESTING=OFF ` -DUSE_LIBPSL=OFF ` -DCURL_USE_LIBPSL=OFF ` -DUSE_NGHTTP2=OFF ` -DUSE_LIBIDN2=OFF cmake --build ".\curl\build\$LibPlatform" --config $Configuration pushd vcproj msbuild GUP.sln /v:m /p:configuration=$Configuration /p:platform=$LibPlatform popd } catch { $_.InvocationInfo.PositionMessage; $_.Exception.Message } finally { popd } > powershell .\build_gup.ps1 Debug x86 # ...

@PeterJones, Thank you for your considered (and considerate) engagement. I actually hesitated to respond with my comment about the 70s and 80s, pretty sure I would get what you gave, but I couldn’t resist—I’m old (83 next month). Anyway, thanks again for putting up with me. …lee

@PeterJones said: PeterJones said: I assume the Search++ syntax would be the same Per the Search++ announcement, it can do the numeric calculations that were first developed for Columns++. I should update the FAQ soon… I recommend waiting on that update. Search++ is not “production ready” yet. People shouldn’t be using it at present unless they want to be beta testers. Once I reach a 1.0 release I’ll make a serious effort to avoid changing things that people would expect to stay the same, but right now, anything could be changed at any time. Numeric expressions in Search++ do not have quite all the features of numeric expressions in Columns++; in particular, the history options (using the values captured or computed in a previous match) aren’t supported in Search++, and the exprtk return statement isn’t supported. However, I think all the features directly cited in the Math FAQ are included. The reg(1) syntax still works, but in Search++ you can use $1 as well. However, a quirk is that since Search++ doesn’t have the persistent Decimal separator is comma option of Columns++, it’s necessary to use regc(1) or $$1 for European-style numbers with periods and/or commas. Finally, Columns++ can only work on the active document. Search++ has a Find in Files option, but Replace in Files has not yet been implemented. So if your guess was correct and @neculai-i.-fantanaru wants a regular expression because it must be applied to many files at once, @thomas-knoefel’s MultiReplace is the best choice among presently-existing options. Oh, and MultiReplace has recently added an option to use exprtk formulas as an alternative to its Lua syntax.

Hello, @blake-g.-barrington, @peterjones, @coises and All, Here is my version to get duplicate lines, separated by any number of lines ( whatever they are : true empty lines, blank lines or lines with text ), even zero line : MARK (?-si)^(.+)(?=(.*\R)+\1$) As said by @Peterjones, and after tests, this kind of regex get into trouble when the bunch of lines, between two duplicate lines, exceeds 15,000 empty lines about ! Now, Let’s suppose you create this text file : first 0002 0003 0004 0005 .... .... .... 9997 9998 9999 10000 first Then the (?-si)^(.+)(?=(.*\R)+\1$) regex returns : Correct result until the number of the in-between lines does not exceed 1,600, with the message 1 match in entire file Correct result until the number of the in-between lines does not exceed 12,000, although the error message Find Invalid Regular Expression ( So F.I.R.E. !! ) occurs ! NO result at all if the number of lines is over 12,000 lines, with, of course, the error message Find Invalid Regular Expression Best Regards, guy038

The syntax file can be created by means of user-defined language. But how to apply this user-defined language automatically when Smart Math is enabled for the current file/document? OK, sorted it out: call NPPM_GETNBUSERLANG first to get the number of UDLs; then iterate through all the UDLs and call GetMenuStringW; once the menu item string matches my UDL name, I’ve identified my UDL menu id; after that, call NPPM_MENUCOMMAND with the obtained UDL menu id. Here is an example withUDL applied: [image: 1788696158249-d17e9134-3e1a-4b20-b7e9-62b16dbc4eff-image.jpeg] It’s a pity that I can’t make the keyword colors (such as function colors) to be dependent on the active color theme/style. I mean, for dark color themes these keywords in blue look too dark, so the color must be changed for dark themes.

Hello, @coises and All, I understand that focusing on N++ buffers, instead of on saved files on disk, is not really appropriate for your multithreaded approach ! You said : I am more inclined to raise a warning box telling the user that some of the files to be searched are currently open in Notepad++, and the search results (and modifications, when I get Replace in Files done) will apply to the stored files, not to the edits in progress in Notepad++. So, given, your constraints, I totally agree ! That seems the more simple and obvious solution, with a Cancel button in case some concerned and opened files are dirty, in current N++ session On the other hand, you said : I wonder if any of this works properly when users have multiple instances of Notepad++ open and the files are open in a different instance than the one doing the search? I personally mainly use N++ in a N++ mono instance so I can’t speak properly of that case. But I agree with you that managing several instances must be a challenge for the Find in Files or Replace in Files feature ! Best Regards, guy038

Microsoft didn’t remove the prompt, but made it configurable, so you can decide if you want to keep it or not. Configuration can be found for example with right click --> properties on the recycle bin icon.

@PeterJones I sent him an email but got no reply. Overall I’m a bit disappointed with this. I think for all his good intentions he’s allowing a strong chance of people accidentally clicking on these malware links, Got nothing more to add. Thanks.

@Roberts-Rozis Kudos. I want this feature too. I want to search my source code project, shared, and library folder to one level deep only because the library folder is very wide and deep, quadrupling the search time.

Hi! A bit late, maybe my ZeroBasedColumn plugin could help with what you’re looking for. It makes the column numbering in Notepad++ start from 0 instead of 1. https://github.com/pasqualeambrosio/ZeroBasedColumn Hope it helps!