@Saiapatsu said in [feature request] Move tab to beginning / end:

Here are LuaScript functions for this, which don’t seem too difficult to port to other scripting plugins

Indeed; here’s a PythonScript version:

# -*- coding: utf-8 -*- # references: # https://community.notepad-plus-plus.org/topic/24799 # for newbie info on PythonScripts, see https://community.notepad-plus-plus.org/topic/23039/faq-desk-how-to-install-and-run-a-script-in-pythonscript from Npp import * def get_number_of_tabs(view=None): retval = 0 if view is None: retval = len(notepad.getFiles()) else: for (pathname, buffer_id, index, v) in notepad.getFiles(): if v == view: retval += 1 return retval curr_view = notepad.getCurrentView() curr_doc_index = notepad.getCurrentDocIndex(curr_view) if 1: # move tab to end positions_to_move = get_number_of_tabs(curr_view) - curr_doc_index - 1 for __ in range(positions_to_move): notepad.menuCommand(MENUCOMMAND.VIEW_TAB_MOVEFORWARD) else: # move tab to beginning positions_to_move = curr_doc_index for __ in range(positions_to_move): notepad.menuCommand(MENUCOMMAND.VIEW_TAB_MOVEBACKWARD)

@Sonali-Sonu ,

End of version support dates

That’s not Notepad++'s “support” model. The support model is “if you find a bug, try the most recent version; if it’s not fixed, report the bug in the most recent version at the official issues pages”.

There will never be a “v8.4.6 bugfix” version once a version after v8.4.6 has been released. Bug fixes always go in the most recent release.

@Alan-Kilborn
Nice work!
Updated in:
https://community.notepad-plus-plus.org/topic/24771/notepad-v8-5-5-release-candidate

@PeterJones and others
Constructors and destructors do not have return type. Researching Regex sequences of the Function List parser with RegEx101 tool shows that the parser expects functions to have return type. Functions without return type do not appear in the Function List. I changed Regex making return type optional. Change makes constructors without initializer to appear in the Function List but destructors are still missing. The reason is the name of the destructor which starts with tilde ‘~’ which is not the word character. Regex expects function names to be words. Changing the Regex seguence “\w+” to “~?\w+” enables function names to start with tilde. Now destructors are shown also. Constructors with initializer are still missing though. They contain additional code inside initializer between ‘:’ and ‘{’ and the Regex inside mainExpr marks “functions” found inside initalizer too. That confuses the parser and Function List is not built. Regex should skip the code inside the initializer, but I don’t know how to achieve this without regular expression replacement or modification which is not supported inside the parser.
I found that changes in overrideMap.xml are ignored, only changes in cpp.xml are being accepted.

Example:

// ExampleClass.h class ExampleClass { private: int i; int j; public: ExampleClass(int x, int y=0); // ctor1 ExampleClass(); // ctor2 ~ExampleClass(); // dtor void Method1(); int Method2() { return i+j; } }; // ExampleClass.cpp #include "ExampleClass.h" // constructor with initializer (ctor1) ExampleClass::ExampleClass(int x, int y) : i(x), j(y) { allocate(); } // constructor without initializer (ctor2) ExampleClass::ExampleClass() { i = 0; j = 0; allocate(); } // destructor (dtor) ExampleClass::~ExampleClass() { deallocate(); } // function not belonging to the class void HelperFunction() { return; } // class method void ExampleClass::Method1() { return; }

Function list with modified cpp.xml:
ba3429fb-67ec-43cf-80e8-e5701df3f950-image.png

I put modified cpp.xml on temporary test location for those who want to test it.

I tested modified cpp.xml on my sources and it works for me.

@Alan-Kilborn I was tinkering everything on that page but unfortunately couldn’t find what I was looking for. I’m new to NPP so excuse my lack of knowledge. Enabling each 4 ‘Fold Margin Style’ does the same: creates a very thin line around the page. “Border Width” does nothing changing value.
Actually what I’m looking for (green marked in the image below) is kind of like “Padding: Top”. Thanks for your reply.

NPP top padding.png

@RH-Hutchins My advice for HTML, or anything, and NP++, or anything, is to aim small. If you type “aim small” into Google you will discover there’s a second part and it’s “aim small, miss small” but it all starts with “aim small.”

Work on understanding small pieces that are easy to chew and swallow. If you come across something that seems too large to consume comfortably then cut it into smaller pieces.

HTML in itself is a huge topic. Most of the web developers I have run across seem to know 1% or of HTML. When they need to work on a web page developed by someone else they often throw out the old/previous work as their 1% does not line up with the 1% of the previous developer.

As far as using NP++ goes, I myself use plain NP++ with no plugins or other special support for HTML. I test the HTML code using a web browser.

@PeterJones well i was wondering if its possible to fix but i have searched about this and apprently it can not be fixed so thats why its a dicussion abou the approach just seeing if others have founnd the solution for it

@PeterJones
I see, thanks for the reply.

@PeterJones Thank you!

@PeterJones

https://github.com/notepad-plus-plus/notepad-plus-plus/issues/13959

@Foodland2023 said in Notepad++ delete 2 lines below a specific string:

Could you suggest any link which gives the detailed explanation of all these?

Yes. In fact, I already did. In my post above: the USEFUL REFERNCES in big bold letters led to links to the Notepad++ Online User Manual: Searching/Regex and to the “FAQ: Where to find other regular expressions (regex) documentation”. That rather gave you what you asked for two hours before you asked for it.

@wonkawilly It looks like you have found a good reason to get access to a newer computer and a more structured learning environment than youtube videos. Hopefully there are people in your life that can help and support you in that area.

To get the thread back on the Notepad++ topic, you could try posing the question “Is it possible to recompile Notepad++ on Windows NT 4.0?” or whatever version of Windows you have. Once you are able to generate an .exe file that works then tweaking it via changes to the source code is far easier to learn plus understand than doing the same from the ground up.

I thought Notepad++ could be compiled using gcc, which is more portable, but it’s possible the code has gone down the Visual Studio path long enough that gcc is no longer an option.

@vijay-kumar
This was the posters reply to solutions provided in a previous thread here.

Please don’t do this as someone reading your reply will have no idea what you refer to. You should have replied in the original thread you started.

I have provided links in both threads so readers will understand what was asked and the replies given.

Terry

@vijay-kumar
This poster replied to what they started here in another new thread here.

The replies appear to have satisfied them.

Terry

@mkupper Thank you for your thoughts on this. The strings are from hackers. They aren’t getting in. I wanted to have an automatic script to block them when they try since they try over and over. I know I can use regex to do that but I also wanted to see what they were looking for to see if it is something that might need tightening up. I would have a report that said something like, “10 attempts to access example.php”. But that seems not to be a simple thing so I will just block them with regex and leave it at that. Thanks, again.

@David-Shepherd Worked for me - thanks. The first time, when I right-clicked from Windows Explorer I selected “edit”, and the file opened in Notepad++ but the file didn’t appear in the taskbar for np++. Then I went to “Open with…” and selected it, and got it in the taskbar, and can pin it - just as you say.

@Dennis-Golding said in Files have vanished:

Any thoughts anyone?

I would suggest reading one of the FAQ posts here. The section titled Scenario: My (unsaved) files are missing! is particularly relevant to your problem.

Good luck
Terry

All the same, I think any feature request for a more system-integrated portable version is better placed with a project that deals exclusively with packaging. Scoop and winget are just the first two that come to mind. There’s even a close-sourced project distributing MSI installers.

@PeterJones said in Installer vs. zip in WIndows 10:

@mkupper

One issue is that it’s not clear if @donho has clearly defined the differences

Looking at this code, it is intentional (though maybe no longer applicable; I doubt he’s checked again on Win8 or later).

Thank you. The code looks good. There are some weird edge cases such if on an x64 system if you install an x32 version of Notepad++ in the x64 folder and try to make that installation a doLocalConf.xml portable installation then it would work as you wanted but for the wrong reason…

@Lycan-Thrope

I saw nothing condescending in his response to you at that time

Neither did I.

(after having to read back on a 2 years old post)

Nobody forced you to do that (if you’re volunteer here).

It’s a straight forward answer to your rhetorical statement.

It’s not. If people want some kind of feedback, that’s not necessarily from developers.

Otherwise one must take your “Feature Request” posts as a plea for attention that would otherwise not be received by simple discussion.

If you want to understand - if you want to! - my tone sometimes appears formal (and more so in the past) because English is not my first language, and I’m more used to academic language than informal one. “Simple discussion” whatever that means , is always good, never wanted more.

One with reading comprehension, would understand that, and not take offense to people trying to help you function better in the environment of the forum.

I didn’t take offense. Yeah, maybe I don’t have reading comprehension. Maybe I’m autistic, maybe I’m mental??? maybe maybe.

Happy? Achived your goal of trying to offend someone?