@Lycan-Thrope said in Unsaved Files Recovery Script:
No one, that makes their way here, can claim to be a computer neophyte. Period. If they have done any computer work previously, they will have learned the major rule. Save and save often. That NPP has an additional edge of protection, should not make them abandon their common sense computer behavior that should have been ingrained in them before they got here.
Because it’s suddenly fashionable to jump off a cliff, does that mean everyone should go jump off a cliff? Certainly not
(…)
the prudent way to mitigate data loss, is to purposely save the document, originally and often.
Once again, we agree on these points. However, they aren’t as relevant to the points we are making as you seem to think:
I have already acknowledged that most NP++ likely discover the Session feature by accident, but perhaps I wasn’t clear about linking this discovery to the independent usage that I also mentioned. Personally, I discovered this feature as I was using NP++ on my own, and I’m guessing that this is true for most of the other users who make use of this feature as well. So, your “fashionable to jump off a cliff” argument isn’t likely relevant here (at least not for the majority of users).
Either way, users who do make use of it learn that it is (surprisingly?) reliable - content is preserved in the vast majority of use cases. However, despite this high degree of reliability, I don’t think users are relying on it for important data, regardless of how they discovered it in the first place. Personally, I simply use it for things like scrap notes - content that isn’t important enough to warrant a new file in any of the various directories that I work out of, but important enough to be (potentially) useful again in the future, yet would not be significantly missed if lost.
Obviously, I can’t speak for other users, but I’d imagine that they use this feature for the same sort of thing. Either way, I certainly agree that anyone who relies on it for more important content is doing so unwisely. In fact, this principle would still apply if the feature were to be reinforced: the goal of the proposed reinforcement is not, as you seem to fear (and rightfully so), to make users comfortable with expanding the importance of the content within their preserved files, it is simply to mitigate inconveniences. So, it’s not crucial to reinforce any limitations that this feature might have, but it is undeniably preferable.