@Coises said:

The necessary function already exists: SCI_INSERTTEXT

Good eye.
I would have thought that function also does things to “jolt the screen”, but apparently not.

@PeterJones

Very similar, but simpler and less “raw”:

from Npp import * try: editor3h # third editor, hidden except NameError: editor3h = notepad.createScintilla() def get_stream_text_from_clipboard(): retval = '' editor3h.clearAll() editor3h.paste() if editor3h.getLength() > 0: retval = editor3h.getText() return retval editor.insertText(editor.getCurrentPos(), get_stream_text_from_clipboard())

Note that the extra effort to get the clipboard text is because PythonScript doesn’t support a way to get current clipboard contents. It can paste the contents with editor.paste(), but if you want to avoid side effects from paste (as we do here) or you want to modify the clipboard text before inserting it, there’s no super simple (i.e. function call way to do it).

Note also that my get_stream_text_from_clipboard() function only works with non-column block data (as its name implies).

BTW, there was a PythonScript request that such a function be created, see HERE, but it seems to be an issue that isn’t going anywhere.

Hello, @DSperber1, @mark-olson, @mkupper and All,

@@DSperber1, I’m pleased that you’ve got the right program ( mrcdat2txt.exe ) to edit your .mrcdat log files :-))

Now, before your last reply, I tried to guess the similarities between some parts of your .mrcdat file and, indeed, I’ve found some !

As you can see on the picture below :

Each row of your table seems to begin with the FFFE sequence

Each row of your table seems to end with the db01 sequence

A four zero-byte sequence occurs in middle of each section

The Yellow sequence looks like a valid UTF 16 LE BOM sequence of characters. Thus, to my mind, I thought to get valid strings after suppression of all zero bytes, in these lines …

… And bingo ! You can verify that each Mauve/Pale Violet line, below, correspond to the File Name part of each line of your table !

97218bb2-d0e7-4fca-a0f9-b03c9b833074-Clipboard_10-16-2024_01.png

Best Regards,

guy038

@guy038 said in Find & Replace:

When the Regular expression search mode is set, running the Boost regex engine :

And
Sixthly, you may use \Q$\E which allows any characters within the \Q and \E to be accepted as literals within a regular expression. In this example the $ is the literal character.

To closer-replicate what @keep2000 was asking for I took @Alan-Kilborn’s code and created a new scriptlet

editor.copyText("file://" + str(notepad.getCurrentFilename().replace('\\', '/')))

and then assigned the keyboard shortcut Alt+/ to it. Alt+/ now loads the current forward slash formatted file path into the copy/paste buffer.

In my case also I wanted the file:// prefix as part of the results.

@PeterJones Thank you so much !!! I found the plugin. It’s called Programmer’s Pal. I tried every setting I could think of and it wouldn’t disable. Once I uninstalled PP I’m golden. I appreciate the help !!!

@Hans-J-Albertsson said in Printing multiple pages per sheet? How???:

Even the lowly Windows Notepad can do that… so why can’t NPP do that???

On Windows 10, with a Brother HL-L2395DW printer, I’m not seeing any difference between Notepad and Notepad++. In both programs, multiple page printing is controlled in the printer driver, not the program. So, click File | Print…, then select the correct printer/driver in the Windows Print dialog, then click the Preferences… button. From there on, the details are specific to your printer driver.

@PeterJones

Is it worth some additional text in the manual, e.g. …

Normally the caret is confined to positions on its line to the left of the line-ending character(s) [side note: not sure even if line-ending stuff is defined adequately in the manual]. When virtual space is enabled, the caret is freed from its confinement and can be placed to the right of line-endings. This has no real effect unless it is followed by the typing of some character, at which point the virtual space is filled with actual space characters to the left of the caret, to fill from the existing line entry to the column of the caret. The new line-ending is then placed to the right of the character entered.

…or…some…such. :-)

I mean, well, I’m clear on the virtual space concept, but new users might not be, so maybe more treatment in the manual is justified.

@xomx Thanks for the info

@bofhlusr said in Does NPP have selective line editing?:

Can npp hide all the lines in a file, and then unhide and display only the lines found in search?

Short answer: No (again).

There have been ideas proposed before about a Find All in Current Document search having a checkbox parameter to show only the lines with search hits (and thus hiding all others), but – I think I said this before – the hide/show lines feature in Notepad++ is not robust, so I’d think that anything based on the idea of hiding/showing lines conditionally is going to be flawed.

@Carlos-Zucareli-Renó said in trocar ponto por vírgula na string numérica:

change period to comma in numeric string
Is it possible to configure in notepad ++?

Not only are you wasting everyone’s time by not posting in English, your topic title (“replace semicolon with comma in numeric string”) doesn’t even match your posting content (“change period to comma in numeric string”).

I won’t even try to answer, nor think about what you’re trying to ask. I’ll just “move on” unless you put some effort behind it on your end, in the form of a reformulated posting.

@Soapboy ,

That’s because /p is not Notepad++'s command-line option for printing (or for anything else, which is why it tries to open a file called /p). The ?-menu’s Command Line Arguments… dialog will show all the command-line options, or you can look in the Online User Manual’s Command Line Arguments page. Specifically, -quickPrint is the way to be able to make Notepad++ print the document from the command-line

@PeterJones

Thanks, but that’s weird because I tried just dragging and dropping it because I was sure that would work, and I’m pretty sure it did in the past, but it hadn’t worked again, so I used imgur … hmm … was I hallucinating?

Hello, @francesco-vespari, @mkupper, @peterjones and all,

Here is my alternate solution :

SEARCH (?-is)^(?:(?!data).)+\R|(?:(?!data).)+|(database\.schema\.[A-Za-z]{3}[0-9]{3})

REPLACE ?1$1

This solution keeps any empty line which already exists in the present text :

So, for example, given this INPUT text :

SELECT * FROM database.schema.ABC123 INNER JOIN database.schema.def456 on id1 = id2 LEFT JOIN database.schema.ghi789 on id2 = id3 WHERE 1=1 SELECT * FROM database.schema.ABC123 INNER JOIN database.schema.def456 on id1 = id2 LEFT JOIN database.schema.ghi789 on id2 = id3 WHERE 1=1 SELECT * FROM database.schema.ABC123 INNER JOIN database.schema.def456 on id1 = id2 LEFT JOIN database.schema.ghi789 on id2 = id3 WHERE 1=1

we would get this OUTPUT one :

database.schema.ABC123 database.schema.def456 database.schema.ghi789 database.schema.ABC123 database.schema.def456 database.schema.ghi789 database.schema.ABC123 database.schema.def456 database.schema.ghi789

Notes :

The first part of the search regex, after the modifiers (?-is) is ^(?:(?!data).)+\R which matches any complete line, with its line-break, ONLY IF it does NOT contain the string data, with this case, at any position of current line

The second alternative (?:(?!data).)+ matches any part of line, which does NOT contain the string data, with this case

Until now, just note that no group has been defined because of the two non-capturing syntaxes (?:...

Finally, the third alternative is the string that we want to keep, i.e. the string (database\.schema\.[A-Za-z]{3}[0-9]{3}), with this exact case, which is stored as group 1

As we use a conditional replacement ?1$1, which means : ONLY rewrite the group 1 if this group is defined, we are just left with the expected text !

Best Regards,

guy038

@Kevin-Burton ,

In general, it shouldn’t go away, unless something weird happened (or maybe you upgraded your OS).

Reinstall might work. And the User Manual has a whole page on the right-click “Edit with Notepad++” at https://npp-user-manual.org/docs/shell-extension/ – so you should read that page if the reinstall doesn’t solve it for you.

Compare plugin in notepad ++ is fantastic for highlighting file difference, and multi edit makes it simultaneous changes easy.

Hello, @penskeguy, @peterjones and All,

Five years ago, I wrote the post, below, to @dinkumoil, where I asked him about some hints, advices and possible improvements. May be, you’ll be interested by some parts of my post :-)

https://community.notepad-plus-plus.org/topic/18214/new-plugin-extsettings/32

At this time, the Selection text color setting did not exist ( BTW, I confirm your findings about this specific setting, whether the ExtSettings dialog is opened or not : it does trigger the text color to the chosen one, only when you click on the Close button or hit the ESC key ! )

From this post, I also extracted the part regarding the Selection Alpha setting, that I reproduced and completed which should be of some interest for you !

If we consider, in RGB mode :

The default current text foreground color (0,0,0)

The default current text background (255,255,255)

The default selection color (192,192,192)

The default current line background color (232,232,255)

Then, the alpha option allows you to change, BOTH, the color of background and foreground ( text ) of the resulting selection, according to the two general formulas :

• RESULTING Selection Background = α × SELECTION Background + ( 1 - α ) × CURRENT Background with α in range [0,1] • RESULTING Selection Foreground = α × SELECTION Foreground + ( 1 - α ) × CURRENT Foreground with α in range [0,1]

In other words, with an α transparency, transposed in range [0-255], we get :

Resulting Bg Red = ( α × 192 + ( 255 - α ) × 255 ) / 255 for part of selection NOT in CURRENT line ¯¯¯ Resulting Bg Green = ( α × 192 + ( 255 - α ) × 255 ) / 255 for part of selection NOT in CURRENT line ¯¯¯ Resulting Bg Blue = ( α × 192 + ( 255 - α ) × 255 ) / 255 for part of selection NOT in CURRENT line ¯¯¯ Resulting Bg Red = ( α × 192 + ( 255 - α ) × 232 ) / 255 for part of selection within CURRENT line ¯¯¯¯¯¯ Resulting Bg Green = ( α × 192 + ( 255 - α ) × 232 ) / 255 for part of selection within CURRENT line ¯¯¯¯¯¯ Resulting Bg Blue = ( α × 192 + ( 255 - α ) × 255 ) / 255 for part of selection within CURRENT line ¯¯¯¯¯¯ And : Resulting Fg Red = ( α × 192 + ( 255 - α ) × 0 ) / 255 = α × 192 / 255 WHATEVER the location of the SELECTION ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ Resulting Fg Green = ( α × 192 + ( 255 - α ) × 0 ) / 255 = α × 192 / 255 WHATEVER the location of the SELECTION ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ Resulting Fg Blue = ( α × 192 + ( 255 - α ) × 0 ) / 255 = α × 192 / 255 WHATEVER the location of the SELECTION ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯

As α value increases towards 255, the gray colors of selected text and the background converge, reducing contrast between them and, when α = 255, color of Fg = color of Bg = (192,192,192), leading to an invisible selected text !!

On the contrary, as α value decreases towards 0, the selection background becomes more and more transparent and, when α = 0, color of Fg = (0,0,0) and color of Bg = (255,255,255), except for the part within current line where color of Bg = (232,232,255)

When the α value has the median value 128 :

The RGB values of the background part of selection NOT in current line are 223,223,223 ≈ ( 128 × 192 + 127 × 255 ) / 255

The RGB values of the background part of selection WITHIN the current line are 212,212,223 ≈ ( 128 × 192 + 127 × ( 232 | 232 | 255) ) / 255

the RGB values of the foreground ( text ) of the selection are 96,96,96 ≈ 128 × 127 / 255

So, in the end, the values between 120 and 140 and, of course, 256 seem only interesting. And value 128, in the middle, is the good compromise !

In the specific case of α = 256, the transparency on BOTH foreground and background colors is desactiveted. However, we can consider that the resulting selection is a blend of a foreground and background opaque selection with an existing default black text on a default white background. Thus, using the above formulas and 256 as α value, we get :

Resulting Selection Background = ( 256 × 192 + ( 255 - 256 ) × 255 ) / 255 ≈ 191,75… => Background selection color = 192,192,192

Resulting Selection Foreground = ( 256 × 0 + ( 255 - 256 ) × 0 ) / 255 = 0 => Foreground selection color = 0,0,0

Best Regards,

guy038

@mkupper Thank you. Interesting. I never changed those settings, but following your instructions resolved the issue.

Here’s a real feature request for making “Find files that don’t contain” a part of standard Notepad++: https://github.com/notepad-plus-plus/notepad-plus-plus/issues/15680