Disregard the version I posted in my previous post. It is bugged and does not work.

This version contains a proper working implementation of a feature in which the current word is boosted to the top if it previously occurred and is otherwise not shown.

from Npp import * # BEGIN SETTINGS AUTOCOMPLETION_MIN_LEN = 2 # min length of word to trigger autocompletion CHARS_TO_MATCH = r'[\w_-]' # characters that can be in "words" (by default most letters, digits, underscores, and dashes) USE_LANGUAGE_IGNORECASE = True # use the document's lexer language setting for ignoring case DEFAULT_IGNORECASE = False # should case be ignored if not using language ignorecase? ENABLED_EXTENSIONS = { '', # files with no extension yet 'csv', 'txt', 'md', 'xml', 'json', 'tsv', 'log', 'dump', 'yaml', 'yml', } # only use for files with these extensions MAX_FILE_SIZE = 200_000 # do not try autocompleting for files with more bytes than this CURRENT_WORD_ONLY_IF_IN_TEXT = True # END_SETTINGS def on_match(m, ctr, ignorecase): '''increase the count of the current word by 1 if ignorecase, store only the uppercase version of each word''' word = m.group(0) if ignorecase: word = word.upper() ctr.setdefault(word, 0) ctr[word] += 1 def getWordRangeUnderCaret(): '''get the start and end of the word under the caret''' pos = editor.getCurrentPos() word_start_pos = editor.wordStartPosition(pos, True) word_end_pos = editor.wordEndPosition(pos, True) return word_start_pos, word_end_pos def getExtension(fname): for ii in range(len(fname) - 1, -1, -1): if fname[ii] == '.': break if ii == 0: return '' return fname[ii + 1:] def onCharInsert(notif): '''Find all words in the document prefixed by the word under the caret and show those words for autocompletion sorted by their frequency. Ignore words with length less than AUTOCOMPLETION_MIN_LEN. May ignore the case of words based on the lexer language (e.g., will ignore case in SQL but not in Python)''' if editor.getLength() > MAX_FILE_SIZE: return ext = getExtension(notepad.getCurrentFilename()) if ext not in ENABLED_EXTENSIONS: return word_start_pos, word_end_pos = getWordRangeUnderCaret() word_length = word_end_pos - word_start_pos word = editor.getRangePointer(word_start_pos, word_length).strip() if word_length < AUTOCOMPLETION_MIN_LEN: return ctr = {} # anything preceded by a non-word-char and starting with the current word match_pat = '(?<!{0}){1}({0}*)'.format(CHARS_TO_MATCH, word) ignorecase = DEFAULT_IGNORECASE if USE_LANGUAGE_IGNORECASE: ignorecase = editor.autoCGetIgnoreCase() else: editor.autoCSetIgnoreCase(ignorecase) if ignorecase: # match case-insenstively if that's the language default match_pat = '(?i)' + match_pat editor.research(match_pat, lambda m: on_match(m, ctr, ignorecase)) if CURRENT_WORD_ONLY_IF_IN_TEXT: if ignorecase: upword = word.upper() if upword in ctr: if ctr[upword] > 1: # word earlier in text, move to front ctr[upword] = 10_000_000_000 else: del ctr[upword] # word not in text, remove elif word in ctr: if ctr[word] > 1: ctr[word] = 10_000_000_000 else: del ctr[word] autocomp = sorted(ctr, key = lambda x: ctr[x], reverse=True) autocomp_str = ' '.join(autocomp) editor.autoCShow(word_length, autocomp_str) if __name__ == '__main__': try: CALLBACK_ADDED except NameError: CALLBACK_ADDED = 1 editor.callback(onCharInsert, [SCINTILLANOTIFICATION.CHARADDED])

@Rick-Welwood

Could you please add a new setting

This is a Community of Notepad++ users. We cannot change the codebase here. See “FAQ: Feature Request”

☐ Show Incremental Search at program startup

It’s not a bad idea, but since Notepad++ remembers a bunch of toggles in the View menu, I’d probably just prefer that Notepad++ just remember whether or not you have Search > Incremental Search active (like it does for remembering the current state of View > Show Symbol > xxx or other View menu toggles).

☐ Incremental Search bar … Match Word

Also a good idea.

could you get a version working on Linux

That’s been made pretty clear: https://github.com/notepad-plus-plus/notepad-plus-plus/wiki/FAQ#support-for-systems-other-than-the-ms-windows-family

Finally worked after enabled directwrite.

@Put-Up

I want to change the color of the letters X, Y, and Z (each a different new color).

Then put them into three different keyword lists, and set a different color for each. It looks like you’re not using keywords 5, 6, 7, or 8, so you’ve got four keyword sets remaining, and have three terms that you want in three different colors. It seems like a natural fit to put X in Keywords 5, Y in Keywords 6, and Z in Keywords 7.

@PeterJones That’s very helpful - thank you!

Find/replace (?-si)(?::\s*"|(?<!%)%\d*[dsf]|(?!\A)\G)\K((?:(?!(?:(?<!%)%\d*[dsf]|")).)*) with \U\1\E.

Note that this won’t actually convert all your text to upper-case, because some of it (the %s format specifiers) will probably cause bugs downstream if it is capitalized. This regex is very careful to avoid capitalizing format specifiers, which is a lot of why it looks (and is, TBH) so hairy.

My regex doesn’t handle all the possible syntax surrounding format specifiers, because I don’t have 3 hours to spend enumerating and debugging each weird edge case, but it should be fine assuming that all the strings are values in dictionaries. The find-regex becomes the absolutely abhorrent (?-si)(?:"|(?<!%)%\d*[dsf]|(?!\A)\G)\K(?=[^"]*"\s*[,\]\}])((?:(?!(?:(?<!%)%\d*[dsf]|")).)*) in the case where the strings can be strings in arrays or values in dictionaries.

Test text:

{ "a.b": "caps %02d %5s %d %03fnocaps %%02dcaps", "b.c.d": "%%caps %3sap %s cap" }

Expected output:

{ "a.b": "CAPS %02d %5s %d %03fNOCAPS %%02DCAPS", "B.C.D": "%%CAPS %3sAP %s CAP" }

If you’re absolutely sure you want to capitalize everything that’s not a key, just use this much simpler regex-replace: "\s*:\s*"[^"]*"

Terry-R said in Help with finding prefixes & selecting entire string:

@Miska-Virtanen said in Help with finding prefixes & selecting entire string:

If I wanted to find all the strings starting with “bb_”, and highlight & replace the entire string, up until the next comma.

That can be done simply with a regular expression (regex). Using the Replace function you would have
Find What:\bbb_[^,]+
Replace With:ZZZ
Search mode must be set to regular expression.

It didn’t sound as if it was only at the start of a line, hence my regex will look for that sequence in any “cell”. If this isn’t what you actually wanted you will need to elaborate.

Terry

Thanks.

Thanks @Mark-Olson / @guy038

Both solutions work a treat !

Appreciate the fast turn around

@Anxo-Alvarez ,

Why?
I feel there’s a, “well now I want to do this, and also this” coming, so why don’t you just layout the full issue you’re thinking of doing, and let’s go from there, but in the meantime, check out the FAQ section in the Forums, particularly:

FAQ Desk: Formatting Forum Posts
FAQ Desk: Generic Regular Expression (regex) Formulas
FAQ Desk: Where to find REGular EXpressions (RegEx) documentation ?

With the new version of Npp 853 the macro system has been updated: now supports Unicode chars too. So it is needed to update your macro to these new standards to make them work again. The FAQ section indicated by the previous poster will help you to do that.

Hello, @reddreddyredd, @mark-olson, @terry-r, @lycan-thrope, @coises and All,

@reddreddyredd, I know that you already reached your goal, with all the advices given in the previous posts, but here is an alternate method :

Move the caret at the beginning of your first string fire_smoke_multi000

Automatically, place any instance of fire_smoke_multi000 at the very beginning of lines with the following regex S/R :

SEARCH \R(?!fire_smoke_multi000)

REPLACE #

Do a 120 × 3 rectangular selection of the string 000

Open the **Column Editor ( ALT + C ) and replace this selection with the appropriate numbering

Finally, replace any # character with a line-break, with the regex S/R :

SEARCH #

REPLACE \r\n    OR    \n ( for an UNIX file )

Best Regards,

guy038

@Giannis-Katebakis ,

FAQ
=> Generic Regular Expression (regex) Formulas
=> Replacing in a specific zone of text

The “zone” you want starts with <p (BSR) and ends with </p> (ESR). You want to find newlines using FR=\R in that zone, and replace with a space character as the RR .

Actually, since your lines are also indented, then FR should probably be \s+ – which would collapse one or more whitespace inside the tags (whether spaces or tabs or newlines or unicode whitespace) into a single space each).

When I replace each of the bolded BSR/ESR/FR/RR with the values I listed, and did a Replace All, it converted

<p align="justify" >The captain and the crew were taking care of the last details when someone remembered that there was no ice in the boat, nor the necessary amount of beer. A volunteer was found and he rushed to buy all that was needed. Soon he was back with a big bag full of ice and a dozen beers and other refreshments.</p> <p align="justify" >The captain decided that everything was ready and we should board the boat and sail. Five minutes later we watched the little harbour getting smaller and smaller. The trip to Ayiofarango had just started.</p>

to

<p align="justify" >The captain and the crew were taking care of the last details when someone remembered that there was no ice in the boat, nor the necessary amount of beer. A volunteer was found and he rushed to buy all that was needed. Soon he was back with a big bag full of ice and a dozen beers and other refreshments.</p> <p align="justify" >The captain decided that everything was ready and we should board the boat and sail. Five minutes later we watched the little harbour getting smaller and smaller. The trip to Ayiofarango had just started.</p>

@Bernard I’m guessing there is an invisible character at the start of the 4th to last lines that is causing them to be sorted after the first three lines.

Try clicking on the blue pilcrow (¶) for Show All Characters in the toolbar to see if things such as ZWSP, ZWNJ, or ZWJ show up. They will have a white letters with a black background.

Another guess is that the file you are editing is marked as read-only. The sort function will do nothing on read-only files. If you right click on the tab for that file see if there is a checkmark to the left of the word “read only” in the right click menu. If so, select that menu option and it’ll turn the read-only mode off.

@csystems-hv said in Regression of v8.5.0, still found in v8.5.3 tracking write protection:

sorry for posting here.

No worries. It is often good to post here first anyway; there may be a simple fix to your problem that the user community can point you to.

@Meta-Chuh Thank you very much for your help !

You’re both more likely to get help if you go to the GitHub repo.

@Mark-Olson said in Regex: Delete empty lines inside an html tag, after .dot:

@Neculai-I-Fantanaru
Yes, my regex did that. If you looked at my data, you would see that your initial example was part of it and my regex did that.

I’m glad you found a solution that works. However, I would note that the \s+\s+ in your regex should be replaced with \s+ because the second \s+ contributes nothing.

Thanks it helps a lot.

Hi, @namx3249 and All,

Ah…, I simply added a leading TAB char before each line of the first part to show you that the regex S/R could also handle this case !

But, If you’re sure that leading blank chars won’t appear in your file, you can simplify the regex S/R as below, to get a similar OUTPUT :

SEARCH (?-s)^(.+\R)\R+(?=http)

REPLACE \1

BR

guy038

@PeterJones Yes but the example you showed all the na’s were the same color. In your example all three of the na’s in different locations were all orange.

I’m trying to set the na function to another color and all the other na’s be orange.

in your example you have the function as orange. I need it to be blue but I still need the na, na, na, and the = na to be orange.

the result I’m looking for would look like this.

Screenshot 2023-06-03 133744.png

It may also be a limitation like with the numbers that I’ll just have to live with it being the same color which is fine if that’s the case it doesn’t have to be identical to the tradingview editor.

I’ve added na in two locations in the keywords section. One in the main keywords that stores all the functions which are blue. Then I’ve added it again in another keyword section that is pinkish color and using the () delimiter it works great as long as the na’s are inside the () but the ones outside are blue so it’s probably just a limitation that I’ll have to live with since the na’s that are functions are also outside of the ().

as far as the numbers issue I can always change the way I am coding and stop using numbers in the variables and type them out like one, two, three if that truly bothers me. it’s not really a big issue. It is super cool the stuff you can do with notepad++ I do enjoy learning this stuff.

EDIT: after removing the () delimiter that I was only using for the na that fixed the issue with the numbers not working. All the numbers show up as they should now. I’ll just live with all the na’s being one color it’s not too big of an issue for me.