@donho, is this possible? :)

Hello, @sepehr-e,

I must admit that sometimes regexes, involving great amount of text, may, wrongly, get an unique match, which represents all the file contents :-(( This case may also happen, in case of regexes with recursive patterns, inside !

I can’t clearly explain this behaviour. May be, it’s related to a matched range of characters, that exceeds a limit. It could also depends on the RAM amount or because of specific N+++ features, like the periodic backup !

Practically, you could use the regex, below, which implies an other condition : the \1+ block of lines, which is to be deleted, must, follow, most of the time, some End of line characters !

(?-s)^(.+\R)(?s).*?\R?\K\1+

Despite you didn’t say anything about your working file, but it could help ?!

Note that the syntax \R must be optional ( => the form \R? ) in case of a block of consecutives identical lines, as for instance :

456 789 123 123 123 123 000

Best Regards,

guy038

@Gogo-Neatza

There are four groups of settings related to tabs

These 4 groups seem to be:

Active tab focused Active tab unfocused Active tab text Inactive tabs

My experimentation with this uncovered that only “Foreground colour” had an effect, and only for 3 of the 4 (Active tab unfocused was unaffected). If anyone has a different experience, I’d be interested to hear it.

@johnwargo

which basically confirms what is discussed - your account doesn’t have
sufficient rights to manipulate the needed registry keys.
Why this account has been removed the permission to modify the needed keys I cannot
say but one solution to solve this issue is to add your account to keys.
In the past, Microsoft provided tools to fix registry permission issues, maybe this is also
available for your os version.

Cheers
Claudia

Hi @lanselibai,

Sure that regexes can sort out all the cases where a 5 digit must be replaced by a 9 digit !!

So, given the 10 numbers, below, containing one or several 5 digits :

52.8 3.457 505 10.5 5 0.345 23558 56789.5512557 5555.5555 0.000000005

Which are the final expected form of each number ? Of course, I suppose that, in real files, these 10 numbers may lie in a single or on several lines

From the results, It should be easy enough to build up the appropriate regex !

Best Regards

guy038

Oh and I guess I should say that I’m coding in c with file sizes that range from 500 lines to 5000 lines.

I’m not sure exactly what you’re saying. So, Np++ is responding; but, you can’t use the new1 file that’s created? Or after it makes new 1 it stops responding? or it’s not responding at all? Or what exactly?

I’m actually OK with those who think it’s TL;DR I probably wasn’t writing to them anyway. ;-) I’d rather have a tl;dr than just say something like, "I sympathize; but, it’s free… get over it. Have a better attitude and as they say, ‘you get more flies with honey than vinegar’ even if some people think flies like more shtuff than shinola.

This is a long standing issue; and I see a frustrated user; I sympathize. Those, like me, having a long history of development are used to having complete control over their projects; seeing a bug and reporting it feels like a duty. Seeing a user with a bona fide suggestion that fixes what I’m sure is an unintended glitch, even more so.
Consolation is never wrong, just on occasion wordy. I relate. I’d say if I was more up on my C++ as I once was, I’d also offer a solution; but, I’m also following on Git, so that seems to have been done… perhaps. Solutions are time sensitive, wait long enough and it’s obsolete, either because it’s handled, or more likely, it won’t plug in.

As one who types quickly, it’s no big thing to type many words, as long as they have substance. Often the squeaky wheel gets the grease. Squeek, squeek. This wheel needs grease. I hate disruptions when I’m coding, who doesn’t!? Shallow thinkers?

Nevertheless, all this doesn’t detract overly from what a great program Np++ is already! Git it over with! ;-) I saw the complexity required, it’s a logic issue, undoubtedly the code exists for handling this I believe this was unintended, it’s a non-sequitur. Often the easiest to solve, if just briefly one dives into the rabbit hole long enough to work out the relationship that’s failing. It’s an, if (a and not b) or c else d kind of thing, or was that if a and not (b or c) else d kind of thing. The switches exist for the intended behavior, it’s just not working… as intended. Or am I reading this feature issue wrong?

Still, will it get done… I put in my two bits, a bit of consoling, and I thought I was done. At least it’s not a wall of text. As far as tl;dr… if what I write is tl, then dr… I don’t care… I mean, how many bits a data did I take up anyway to console a frustrated user, one I sympathize with, and apparently he’s not alone from what I’ve read. Still it’s Np++, and it is what it is… take it or leave it. How many millions use it. No revenue stream… God Bless Don Ho! That’s what I say.

Functionlist seems to work for me with a test.js containing a simple function:

function convert(val) {
var y
switch(val) {
case “A”: {y=10; break}
}
return y
}

Do you have a example which is not working?