Thanks very much
I have tried the first one and it does work

Best wishes 😊

@NonSecwitter said:

I was just wondering if any thought had been given to using the Windows registry to maintain configuration settings … Is this something that could be implemented?

hopefully not.

Probably the INS key got pressed accidentally, changing the caret and making it harder to see. LOL.

@Scott-Boyd

Then it would let me modify that setting and keep it regardless of whether I ran it as admin or under my ID. Once I figured this issue was happening and corrected it, I was able to update and install plugins through the Plugin Admin option.

this is perfect and nice to hear.
thanks for reporting back.

@Sammy-Bresel

Since you are “script willing”, I might suggest Pythonscript (which is super if you already know Python) and a script to get you going with search/replace that could be adapted to what you want might be found here: https://notepad-plus-plus.org/community/topic/16942/pythonscript-any-ready-pyscript-to-replace-one-huge-set-of-regex-phrases-with-others/

Hello, @alan-kilborn, @maria-nita and All,

Alan, the first answer of this stackoverflow’s topic is really the best one ;-))

Indeed ! At first sight, although that, in OP text , word CAT always precedes the word DOG, I thought about the search regex, below :

^.*(CAT).*(DOG).*|^.*(?2).*(?1).*

However, the syntax ^(?=.*CAT)(?=.*DOG).* is really more elegant !

We can generalize to any number of words and, also, add conditions which should not occur ;-)) . For instance, the following regex would match all lines, with their line-breaks, which :

Contain the 3 expressions WORD_1 AND WORD_2 AND WORD_5

Does NOT contain the 2 expressions WORD_4 OR WORD_6

(?-s)^(?=.*WORD_1)(?=.*WORD_2)(?=.*WORD_5)(?!.*WORD_4)(?!.*WORD_6).*\R

So, it matches the lines 5, 12 and 14, only, in the text :

This line 1 contains WORD_1 WORD_2 This line 2 contains WORD_1 WORD_3 WORD_5 This line 3 contains WORD_3 WORD_5 WORD_4 This line 4 contains WORD_1 WORD_5 This line 5 contains WORD_5 WORD_2 WORD_1 This line 6 contains WORD_2 WORD_1 WORD_6 WORD_5 This line 7 contains WORD_4 WORD_1 WORD_5 This line 8 contains WORD_2 This line 9 contains WORD_5 WORD_2 WORD_4 WORD_7 WORD_1 This line 10 contains WORD_1 WORD_6 WORD_2 This line 11 contains WORD_4 WORD_2 WORD_1, WORD_5 WORD_6 This line 12 contains WORD_7 WORD_2 WORD_5 WORD_1 This line 13 contains WORD_6 WORD_2 WORD_1 WORD_5 This line 14 contains WORD_1 WORD_5 WORD_8 WORD_2 WORD_3

Best Regards,

guy038

@Ekopalypse Thanks for help
It works now,
I have made a mistake

Thanks, At first I thought since this has only happened this once, for now I’ll just push the [ok] button. But your answer also prompted me to look at what I’ve pasted in and see if anything stands out.

Some background: The “crtl+u” source is from a bank debit card site list of transactions, a register, normal stuff. What’s interesting is the generated source has everything on the page except for the register. Like, a transaction for Dominos appears on screen, but search the code and no Dominos.

Y’know, turning off the spell check might be the ticket! If I settle this I’ll re-post with a brief account of the status.

Hi @andrecool-68 ,

May I know the steps to configure the display settings , because default recommendation settings and resolutions I am using in my setup . I remember that previously, might be last august it worked well after that it is not getting adjusted to the screen settings .Now i thought to fix that issue when i found same is happening for others also

This is working! Thanks a lot for this solution!

Still not the “perfect” solution, but I’ll remember that.

I would really love to hear an original developer comment on why they decided to add a second CTRL-A function exactly at the place where it should “naturally” be a multiple line select function!

Afaik no

@Meta-Chuh

Now I have comments and the section headers, operator “=”, numbers and a few keywords.
Only the comments are foldable, still missing is that the header and the contents of a section is foldable together. They are not connected yet as they are in the original lexer.