• Search++: A work in progress

    Notepad++ & Plugin Development
    166
    7 Votes
    166 Posts
    51k Views
    guy038G
    Hello, @coises, @peterjones, @astewart77 and All, Of course, regarding my bookmarks’s use, I also, very often use them, as described by @peterjones, to easily reach specific locations, in current file which, indeed, are kept from current session to the next one, as long as you keep this current file opened in the current session and that you close and restart Notepad++, in order to save these bookmarked lines in session.xml file ! In addition, when I marked all the occurrences of a specific search, it’s quite easy to navigate between them, using the F2 and Shift + F2 shortcut to reach the next / previous bookmarked line ! Once again, you’ll need to close and restart N++ => All the bookmarks of the previous search are kept but, of course, the RED Mark style of each occurrence has now disappeared ! BR guy038
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    68 Views
    No one has replied
  • Improving Find in Files performance

    General Discussion
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    41 Views
    No one has replied
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    37 Views
    No one has replied
  • Notepad++ Release Candidate v8.9.8.1

    Pinned Announcements
    14
    2 Votes
    14 Posts
    1k Views
    S
    @donho Typo: “7 Fix Netork Path Warning dialog usability problem.” --> Network
  • Notepad++ release 8.9.8

    Pinned Announcements
    25
    6 Votes
    25 Posts
    7k Views
    M
    I am seeing an issue that I’m not certain it is the installer of Notepad++ 8.9.8 itself or if Microsoft has inadvertently caused this… Using Microsoft’s Enterprise App Catalog to install 8.9.8 on top of an existing installation of 8.9.6.4 seems to result in the registry information being updated to say 8.9.8 but when you check C:\Program Files\Notepad++\notepad++.exe it is still 8.9.6.4. This was horrifying, as it’s the perfect way to maintain a vulnerable copy of the app on Enterprise systems. It could go completely unknown because, at least on ours, MDM systems seem to inventory based on what the registry says and not what’s on the actual disk. Server OS endpoints updated using the traditional SCCM method appear to update correctly. So, this adds weight to the issue being Microsoft’s Enterprise App Catalog implementation. It is almost as though they are updating the registry on behalf of Notepad++, ignoring the true status of the app.
  • -2 Votes
    1 Posts
    110 Views
    No one has replied
  • Feature/improvement suggestion

    General Discussion
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    128 Views
    No one has replied
  • Fake Notepad++ website

    Security
    4
    3 Votes
    4 Posts
    824 Views
    xomxX
    @donho There seems to be another one: notepad-plus-plus . app I reported this too. GH issue: NPP brand impersonation website serving malware #18398
  • Praise Notepad++

    Praise Notepad++
    3
    1
    3 Votes
    3 Posts
    4k Views
    F
    @Maddox-Armstrong said: @FreeMeow I goon to Notepad++ :P 666还有蜥蜴人
  • You've a lot of reasons to hate Notepad++

    Pinned Boycott Notepad++
    92
    5 Votes
    92 Posts
    185k Views
    F
    作者的大黑几把干的我豪爽。啊啊啊啊啊要去了。
  • 傻逼软件,傻逼作者,傻逼呆湾人

    Boycott Notepad++
    7
    -1 Votes
    7 Posts
    5k Views
    F
    坚决维护共产党!任何邪恶中将绳之以法{亥~}。打响时我直接娟500m,掌上永远有这个钱!我要购买鸿星尔克,(不吃白象方便面不健康)直接就是一个练~起~来~曼watkanaisay曼波曼波。我都已经这样了你为什么布顺从我? 正在使用花为18 uitra啊啊啊啊这个这个啊啊啊是吧
  • 叮咚鸡叮咚鸡,大狗大狗叫叫叫

    Boycott Notepad++
    1
    -1 Votes
    1 Posts
    76 Views
    No one has replied
  • 0 Votes
    8 Posts
    463 Views
    PeterJonesP
    @andrecool-68 said: All the mark of the web looks okay, and all the files are in the right place. I am not sure why it’s not working for you. With a similar installation, but 64-bit, I have no problems with Plugins Admin Admin mode: ON Can you try running not as administrator. That can sometimes mess up permissions, so maybe for some strange reason, your Admin has been denied privilege on one or more of the DLL or EXE files mentioned? installing the 64-bit 8.9.8 on that machine, instead of 32-bit, and see if it behaves the same? confirm that you don’t have this problem with v8.9.7 on the same setup First few experiments on my end: 8.9.8-64bit, non-Admin: my daily driver, and I use Plugins Admin frequently: [image: 1789590084696-dc568790-b6ce-4a3c-aaaa-422d9f5937c8-image.jpeg] 8.9.8-64bit, Admin: [image: 1789589967329-aeeef823-c099-463b-b884-00b51add713b-image.jpeg] 8.9.8-32bit, Not Admin: [image: 1789589989950-e94d8be8-7ade-4530-8536-01033d4d4e35-image.jpeg] 8.9.8-32bit, Admin: [image: 1789590011468-5247e7c8-2097-41fe-ad98-0ed554c34815-image.jpeg] So, so far, on my Win 11 machine, I cannot replicate with 64-bit or 32-bit, admin or no, with the portable (or the installed, for 8.9.8-64) Update Virtual Win 10 machine: Portable 32-bit: Plugins Admin is there, whether normal run or Admin Portable 64-bit: Plugins Admin is there, whether normal run or Admin Installed 64-bit: Plugins Admin is there, whether normal run or Admin Installed 32-bit: Plugins Admin is there, whether normal run or Admin [image: 1789591116798-5959e708-0015-4e87-8f3a-50f4928df7b7-image.jpeg]Notepad++ v8.9.8 (32-bit) Build time: Aug 23 2026 - 17:20:01 Scintilla/Lexilla included: 5.6.6/5.5.3 Boost Regex included: 1_90 pugixml included: 1.16 nlohmann JSON included: 3.12.0 Path: C:\Program Files (x86)\Notepad++\notepad++.exe Command Line: Admin mode: ON Local Conf mode: OFF Cloud Config: OFF WinGUp: present disableNppAutoUpdate.xml: absent Periodic Backup: ON Placeholders: OFF Scintilla Rendering Mode: SC_TECHNOLOGY_DIRECTWRITE (1) Multi-instance Mode: monoInst asNotepad: OFF File Status Auto-Detection: cdEnabledNew (for current file/tab only) Dark Mode: OFF Display Info: primary monitor: 1024x666, scaling 100% visible monitors count: 1 installed Display Class adapters: 0000: Description - VirtualBox Graphics Adapter (WDDM) 0000: DriverVersion - 7.1.8.18469 OS Name: Windows 10 Home (64-bit) OS Version: 22H2 OS Build: 19045.5854 Current ANSI codepage: 1252 Plugins: mimeTools (3.1) NppConverter (4.7) NppExport (0.4) I tried to get as close to your setup as I possibly can, and I still cannot replicate your problem. If what I have suggested to you to try doesn’t help, then you’ll have to wait for someone else to have some ideas. Good luck,
  • [New plugin] Smart Math

    Notepad++ & Plugin Development
    7
    1 Votes
    7 Posts
    1k Views
    Vitalii DovganV
    Here are the latest binaries if you are interested: 32-bit: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jmKaSU5YF2Hd2mHKAWDZyG4NDfx99Xnc/view?usp=drive_link 64-bit (x86_64): https://drive.google.com/file/d/1mrqNicsfjfJITmrfeHlG2WEzgHZdokI-/view?usp=drive_link
  • 0 Votes
    6 Posts
    1k Views
    guy038G
    Hello, @Roberts-Rozis, @Peterjones, @dennis-bulgrien, @coises and All, @Coises, I did some tests with my D USB key and with your Search++ plugin and the following generic regexes solve the problem nicely : So, @Roberts-Rozis and @dennis-bulgrien : Select The Plugins > Search++ > Search in Files... option Select your média (C, D, … ) on the left and don’t forget to check the Subfolders option and, possibly, the Hidden files option Select the Reg. exp. option for the Filter : type In the filter box : • For a search of any file, even WITHOUT extension, between level N minimum and M maximum, enter : ^(?:[^\\]+\\){N,M}[^\\]+ • For a search of any file, WITH an extension, between level N minimum and M maximum, enter : ^(?:[^\\]+\\){N,M}[^\\]+\..+ • For a search of any file with the EXACT extension 'txt' or 'log' or 'ini', between level N minimum and M maximum, enter : ^(?:[^\\]+\\){N,M}[^\\]+\.(?:txt|log|ini)$ You may also add a size and/or a date condition Of course, check your desired search options Finally, click on the Find in Files button IMPORTANT : Replace the letters N and M by true digits, with the condition N <= M. The M value may be missing ! The syntax of these regexes are specific to the Search++ These regexes allow any search in an arborescence, from level N minimum to level M maximum. However : You may search from level 0, if necessary You can go through all the structure with the 0, or the N, syntaxes Note that you can simulate the Search++ filtering mode by using one of the regexes below, directly in Notepad++ ^(?:[^\\\r\n]+\\){2,4}[^\\\r\n]+$ ^(?:[^\\\r\n]+\\){2,4}[^\\\r\n]+\..+ ^(?:[^\\\r\n]+\\){2,4}[^\\\r\n]+\.(?:txt|log|ini)$ Against the text below, that you’ll paste in a new tab : 987.txt abc\123.txt abc\def\456.txt abc\def\ghi\789.txt abc\def\ghi\jkl\012.txt abc\def\ghi\jkl\mno\pqr\stu\vwx\yz\999.txt 987.txt abc\123.txt abc\def\456.txt abc\def\ghi\789.ini abc\def\ghi\jkl\012.log abc\def\ghi\jkl\mno\pqr\stu\vwx\yz\999.txt LICENSE abc\LICENSE abc\def\LICENSE abc\def\ghi\LICENSE abc\def\ghi\jkl\LICENSE abc\def\ghi\jkl\mno\pqr\stu\vwx\yz\LICENSE You may also try, for example, the cases {0,3} or {0,} or even {4,}. Enjoy ! Best Regards, guy038
  • 1 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    D
    It never inserts the text at the caret’s position for me: it either moves up a line and/or replaces the existing text. What am I misunderstanding?
  • 0 Votes
    2 Posts
    119 Views
    PeterJonesP
    @Allinmyhead , Notepad++ has no notion of “post”. It just sees a big blob of text, and tries to apply the search string you give it. If you search for just your username, that’s the only piece that will match. If you use a more complicated regular expression (“regex”), you can define a fancy search that will match more. If you gave more details about what a “post” is formatted in text, we could help you come up with the right regex. For example, if the post is username: blah blah blah [newline][newline], then something like ^username: .*?\R\R would find everything from username: to the two newlines in a row. But Notepad++ is not just going to “hide” everything else, and allow you to look at just that. As you do each Find Next, it will just highlight the entire match. It might be possible, if you gave us examples of what this file would look like, to be able to strip out “posts” that aren’t yours, instead. (Similar to the above, but matching anything but your username at the start of the post). But until you give us example data that matches your formatting, and show which posts you’d like to keep and which to delete, there is no way we could randomly come up with the right regex to help you. Click the </> button in your reply. Put some data in the code-box that creates. Make sure the data matches your actual data, and is formatted exactly the same. Indicate which “posts” you’d like to keep vs delete. Make sure you give us a description of how you, as a human, would recognize where one post starts and ends. Update: it might actually be easier to use the Mark dialog to mark all the username posts, rather than the find/replace to delete the non-username posts. That would allow “copy marked lines”, and then the username-only ones could be pasted in a new file, rather than deleting the non-username posts from the original. But it depends on the shape of the data, and whether you’d prefer to just delete from your old file or create a new one…
  • wireloom in markdown viewers

    Notepad++ & Plugin Development
    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    416 Views
    rdipardoR
    @Keith-Collyer said: I ended up adding a request to the markdig library here: https://github.com/xoofx/markdig/issues/952 👍
  • [New Plugin] MultiReplace

    Notepad++ & Plugin Development
    81
    3 Votes
    81 Posts
    86k Views
    Thomas KnoefelT
    MultiReplace 6.1 is out and will land in Plugin Admin with the next Notepad++ release. The focus of this release is Replace All in One Pass, running the whole list in a single left-to-right sweep instead of one full pass per entry, together with a reworked Find/Replace in Files and a handful of list and UI improvements. Several new options live under Plugins > MultiReplace > Settings. Download: Latest build Key Features & Improvements Replace All in One Pass: Runs the whole list in a single pass instead of one full Replace All per entry, so results build on each other left to right. With cat → dog and dog → cat, sequential mode turns “cat dog” into “cat cat”, one pass turns it into “dog cat”. Much faster on large documents. Toggle per tab, right-click the list tab. Use Open Documents: Find/Replace in Files can now work on files already open in Notepad++ as the live document, unsaved changes included, instead of the copy on disk. New checkbox in Settings. Skip Binary Files: New option for Find/Replace in Files (on by default), same detection as ripgrep and VS Code. Also adds UTF-16 detection without a BOM, and skipped files are always reported, broken down by reason. CSV Header Rows: Find/Replace now always searches header rows too. “Header rows to exclude” only protects sorting and duplicate detection. Collapse to File List: New Search Results dock option folding every search block down to just file names and hit counts. Ctrl/Shift-click works in the fold margin, same as Notepad++'s own Search Results panel. Library Mode: “Keep list always visible” can now be switched right from the Use List button’s context menu, no detour through Settings. Add New Row: Takes over the dialog’s current search options instead of starting all off. Find/Replace text still starts empty. Duplicate Row Reporting: A list row that exactly duplicates an earlier enabled one is skipped as before, but the status line now tells you how many rows were skipped. [image: 1789296944806-e15a9d23-6db6-4411-a694-d44fc95300e5-image.jpeg] Issues or suggestions: GitHub. Happy replacing!