@rdipardo said in Better Function List for Java ?:
let me try to explain why this grossly overstates Lexilla’s capabilities.
Somewhat optimistic, possibly. But I don’t think it’s grossly overstated.
A lexer is in fact surprisingly like a regex engine.
And as such, it should be able to do at least as well as the regex-based approach, with the added benefit that it’s much easier to track state inside the non-extensible C++ code, so being able to track whether or not a function definition is still within a given class or not would be possible to add – though it may be a lot of effort.
But I don’t think that anyone should bother with such a feature request to Lexilla, because I am quite confident that, no matter whether my feasibility estimation is just optimistic or “grossly overstated”, they would reject it out of hand.