Thanks. It’s recommended to use a resource editors there, but it’s a crunch. It’s strange to use it after any new installation and create a version of my own “new Notepad++ killar”. I don’t understand why author delete something which might be useful for users? I’m not afraid of changes, I update all my programs with pleasure and all of them are up to date, but if you know it’s so sad not to find in new versions an options, which I’m using for years and which is so useful for me, like it makes Google in their Chrome, etc.
Yes, author can return it back, okay, but now it seems, that something might move away in new versions, code highlight will be, because author concider that it’s not so cool. Why not? But where’s a defence against it?
