@inkognito said in Remove "duplicate" lines based on only a specific part of the line:

How can I apply it to the text file without opening it in Notepad++?
Are there any corresponding options over the command line?

Two very leading but somewhat loosely defined questions.

Find in Files allows you to select a number of files based on filters, such as folders (and hidden & sub-folders), file type, partial filename. So the files are edited by Notepad++ (NPP) but don’t show in the NPP view(s). You could say they aren’t opened by NPP if you mean “do I see them in the NPP view”.

I am aware that there is the ability to have an “auto start” functionality upon loading NPP. The information is in the FAQ section here. So it uses the PythonScript plugin along with an “auto-start” script file called “startup.py”. Upon NPP loading it immediately starts processing the commands in this script file.

There is another PlugIn called NppExec and a post late last year suggested it might have a method on autostarting once NPP is loaded, see post #26006. Unfortunately there isn’t a lot else I have seen on NppExec, it doesn’t tend to get much exposure.

If you are referring to editing these files without NPP itself loading, then that is a whole other question which resides outside of this forum. Other command line editors such as AWK, SED, GREP etc might offer you that functionality but as I say that is not for this forum to answer. You would need to visit forums based on which ever editor you wish to use. The regular expression I provided might work as is in another editor, but likely would require some massaging to perform correctly.

Terry

@Manish-Patel,

Based on your description, I assume you are seeing something akin to
e28deaed-860a-4b30-9409-669bbcf0badd-image.png
… where the regex starts looking like a quote starts inside.

In that example, I also showed examples of how the escape is actually intentended to work: the “Escape” character escapes the various open/close symbols _when embedded between open/close symbols. So "In \" quotes", it properly treats the \" as being inside the string, not ending the string, and similarly for the single-quote example.

Since, based on your <Keywords...> line, you don’t have regex defined as delimiters, the parser is not in a mode where it knows it needs to escape them.

If you define regex wrappers as delimiters as well, like:
c4459c06-30a2-4102-b735-97449b2d96f2-image.png

… then you can get it to treat the regex as a string:
9c3810c4-bef3-4bb0-b24e-9443e312a000-image.png

The reason the quote isn’t starting a string inside the regex is because, by default, UDL doesn’t allow nesting of delimiters, unless you tell it to in the Stylers. This is more obvious if I do the same regex, but with the quotes not escaped:
186dddd5-94e5-4595-a12f-d3b85b0f2d2b-image.png

The quotes are still not treated as string-starters, because the regex delimiters were not defined to allow nesting of the string delimiters.

On the other hand, if you define Delimiter 5 to be [ and \ and ] and then in the Styler definition you also allow nesting of Delimiters 1 and 2:
f6821207-5207-450b-98b9-5168b42c7068-image.png

… then you can get another example, which shows quotes embedded in brackets, and escaped brackets:
347cbe63-ed9c-482b-8cbd-97498d8cc7f3-image.png

If you escape the quotes when inside brackets, they will not be recognized as embedded quotes anymore:
8ec9e14d-4e2d-48fe-848b-4b5bf5931cd6-image.png

So I believe these are the kinds of setups you will want. Defining the regex wrappers as delimiters as well should go a long way to giving you what you want, I think.

@PeterJones said in Re-Assign hotkey: Conflict found --> auto-delete previous assigment?:

Once you know for sure which one you want to not use that shortcut, you just have to click on it and choose Clear

Unless it’s a Scintilla command; as discussed in this thread, those are much more cumbersome to clear.

After long delay, I made an official Notepad++ issue out of this:

https://github.com/notepad-plus-plus/notepad-plus-plus/issues/16514

In the issue, I switched to using NppExec to reproduce, rather than PythonScript, lest it be interpreted as a PS bug and not a N++ bug.

@MarkusBodensee said:

Highlight the entry in the dropdown and press Del to delete.

To extend this idea, drop down the combobox, then press and hold Del (aka Delete) to remove all entries (ask the key repeats).

@Andrea-Astolfi-0

Didn’t you already say this, HERE ?

This is a long-known issue; I could be wrong but I believe the reason it hasn’t been fixed is that it is related to other problems Notepad++ has with “high dpi” screens…

If you’d like, you can find the issue in the official Notepad++ issue list, start HERE, and add a comment (to the existing issue) in the form of an “I noticed this too and would like it fixed”.

@PeterJones said in posting code (by copy & paste) with line numbers:

@Lycan-Thrope ,

If it’s automatically picking the D language, have you looked at Settings > Preferences > New Document > Default Language – does it say D instead of None (Normal Text)? If so, change that preference back, and it will go back to defaulting to normal text. (That setting cannot be affected by UDL, so I don’t see how your dBASE UDLs could be doing anything to influence it…)

@PeterJones ,
Thanks, this was the cause.
Now that I think back, I think I was doing a help in the forum and used that to show the language setting and take screenshots…and forgot to put it back. DOH!!
Back to normal…thanks for curing my forgetfulness. :-)

@guy038 Thank you very much. @PeterJones I don’t come here to “fight” with anyone - I linked to the explanation of the SKIP/FAIL method by @guy038 just to help future readers to understand it. I am sorry if I have hurt you but that was not my intention. I request others to comment if any of my posts seem offensive and why they seem so (if they deem it so) - I will correct myself.

@kapenike said in Bold font style change on Linux Mint:

@PeterJones yes I agree, I believe the OP is ------. Keep it to reddit

Either I have misunderstood what you were implying by that term, or I think you seriously misunderstood me somewhere along the way. I was never intending to insult or otherwise denegrate you – and I would never use the term that I think you were trying to obfuscate to refer to anyone.

As @mathlete2 said, maybe you just forgot that you had different settings on the two; or, as all I was trying to say, you maybe didn’t notice that it was a plain text file on one machine and a syntax-highlighted file on another.

Or maybe that wasn’t the cause at all: given the symptoms you described, and the resolution that you said works, I cannot, right now, think of anything else that would have matched your description on both sides of the equation, which is why I currently believe that; but if you have evidence to the contrary, then great. If you wanted to help figure out why things were behaving differently on Windows and Wine for you, then provide some more evidence, and we can try to help you figure it out; or if you’ve got a solution that works for you, and you don’t care about the cause, that’s fine – but I was honestly not in any way trying to insult or attack you.

@C-Bacca said in On install regsvr32 has stopped working:

On windows Server 2013

Do you mean Windows Server 2012 R2 (Windows 8.1 based)?

(I can try to test the same in a VM but has to be sure which Windows…)

@C-Bacca said in On install regsvr32 has stopped working:

I have limited permissions to install on this dev machine so I installed

From your error messages is clear that there is a problem with registering the Notepad++ context menu shell extension (NppShell). Since only “system-wide” registration (which in turn needs the admin-rights anyway) is currently supported for NppShell, I would simply choose to install without this shell extension during installation:
npp-installer-no-NppShell.png

Other workaround is to use a portable N++ version instead, e.g. here is the link to the latest v8.8 (x64): https://github.com/notepad-plus-plus/notepad-plus-plus/releases/download/v8.8/npp.8.8.portable.x64.zip

Just unzip that to your writable folder of choice and run there the Notepad++.exe. And portable N++ versions do not contain the NppShell at all, so no similar regsvr32 problem is possible…

@C-Bacca said in How do I sort strings separated by commas?:

is there a way to make this a series of steps, like a macro,

Yes, you should be able to record it and save it as a macro.
Note that Step 1 would not be part of the macro, but would be something that you have to do before running the macro.
For more on macros see HERE.

@PeterJones said in Is the shortcut mapper dialog box broken?:

Could you download the appropriate artifact for your installed Notepad++, and see if this build fixes it for you?

I’m now using both the MSVC.x64.Release and MSVC.Win32.Release Notepad++.exe files. The shortcut mapper issue has been fixed. Thank you @PeterJones

@PeterJones I have also requested it there at https://github.com/notepad-plus-plus/notepad-plus-plus/issues/9517

@dr-ramaanand said in need help to look for a word:

simply because it is easier

That’s apparently a matter of opinion. To me, negative lookbehind, where it’s telling you “look behind the current position, and make sure it’s not XYZ” is a lot easier to read/understand than “match something, then say, wait no, I don’t actually want to match that, let’s fail this whole path and move on to the alternation”. (And, from what I can tell, that’s not really a good explanation of skip+fail, because it takes our regex guru pages of text to explain it, whereas I can successfully convey the meaning of a negative lookbehind in one sentence.)

Since your first version of the skip+fail post was wrong, and you couldn’t tell this immediately, even after it was pointed out to you that it was wrong, I am not convinced that it’s truly as “simple” – even for you – as you are implying.

I am going to stick with recommending solutions that i could explain if necessary; I will only personally link to the skip+fail formula if I know of no other way to do something (and I wouldn’t tell anyone it’s “simple”)

But if it truly makes more sense to you than a negative lookbehind, that’s great for you; everyone is different.

@Game-Movies:

This is indeed what your data looks like:

<strong>$1</strong>!

Your search screen capture shows that you are using Regular expression search mode. This isn’t going to allow you to match the $ as that is a special character.

You’d want:

<strong>\$1</strong>!

But if you remove that, wouldn’t you also want to remove the line (now empty) that it is on as well? And what about the <p> and </p> lines that wrap it?

I get the sense that you are just kind of hacking at this, and are likely to end up with a mess in the end.

@guy038 Oui, merci beaucoup!

Hi, @fern99, @terry-r, @mkupper and All,

An other example :

To list all files which do NOT contain the strings ABC AND JKL AND XYZ, in upper case, from your opened documents, use :

FIND (?s-i)(?=\A.*(?:ABC|JKL|XYZ))(*SKIP)(*F)|\A.

Check the Wrap around option

Click on the Find All in All Opened Documents button

REMARK : Do keep the LAST regex dot ( . ), after \A. If omitted, consecutive searches of this regex does *NOT give the same results ! ( Bug ? )

BR

guy038

@byzod

This issue mentions about the unfolding that can happen with numerous lexers.

https://github.com/notepad-plus-plus/notepad-plus-plus/issues/12121

I posted a LuaScript script in a comment in that thread that trades the behavior for another behavior by changing the editor.AutomaticFold setting temporarily in the 2nd script. Certain characters will set the automatic folding off which changes the header fold lines to become invisible sections and back again once continue editing. It is not a solution but rather a swap of side-effects to help to keep the current fold state.

I have little knowledge of AutoHotkey syntax and it’s UDL issues so at the moment cannot offer an updated LuaScript script for calling editor.AutomaticFold.

The objective-c lexer seems unaffected with /* multi-line comments and not sure why yet compared to looking at the lexers source code. Obviously the styling continues on past the folding though why it does not open the folds seems like possibly the folding is delayed in some lexers and so like the LuaScript script does is to cause a delay though that is just a theory at the moment.

@PeterJones yes that was it!
So indeed it was an easy one - you’d think I would have figured that out. Haha
Thank you for pointing me to the setting!

@PeterJones, thank you so much!